“extremely significant”

Accurate root cutting rate The results of the variance analysis for the accurate root cutting rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

infection rates were 54.0% and 38.3% in diarrheic and non-diarrheic calves, which was an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

All statistical analyses were performed using Origin 2024 software, and differences were considered statistically significant at “ p < 0.05” and extremely significant at “ p < 0.01”. 5.

*** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), * p < 0.05 (significant).

Correlation analysis The correlation analysis results show that most TOC, N, P, K, C/N, C/P, C/K, N/P, N/K and P/K have extremely significant ( p <0.01) correlations ( Fig 3 ), especially the correlations between TOC-C/N, TOC-C/K, C/N-C/K, C/P-C/K, C/N-N/P, C/P-N/P, N-N/K, N/P-N/K and P/K-N/P are above 0.5 or below -0.5.

* Indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time; ** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the control group and the 0.5 ppm thyme essential oil treatment group under the same storage time. 3.

α-HCH was in extremely significant positive correlation with δ-HCH and β-HCH (P < 0.01), δ-HCH was in extremely significant positive correlation with β-HCH (P < 0.01), Aldrin was in extremely significant positive correlation with Dieldrin and Endrin (P < 0.01), Dieldrin was in extremely significant positive correlation with Endrin (P < 0.01). α-HCH was in significant negative correlation with PCB 28 (P < 0.05).

Lastly, the rare ginsenoside F2 displayed an extremely significant difference in cell activity measurement results at the concentration of 5 μg/mL ( p < 0.01), with significant differences also observed at 10 and 20 μg/mL ( p < 0.05).

The activity of LAM in the recombinant yeast expression supernatant was compared before and after the SW reaction, which indicated that the enzyme activity of the wild-type chLAM was reduced by 47.6 times after reaction with SW, the difference was extremely significant ( P <0.01), while there was no significant difference in the experimental group chLAM M ( P >0.05) ( Fig. 3B ).

Soil pH and carbon cycling nutrients exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with soil multifunctionality ( P < 0.01).

Results: It was considered that there was a significant difference when the p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference when the p < 0.01 or <0.001 ( 26 ). 2.6.

In the experiment, x 2 , x 3 , x 1 2 and x 2 2 had extremely significant effects on the normal force ( p < 0.01).

The different asterisks indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, extremely significant differences at p < 0.01, etc. 5.

Furthermore, Erysipelotrichales demonstrated an extremely significant correlation with HDL-C and ALP ( p < 0.01), while Eggerthellaceae showed a significant negative correlation with HDL-C ( p < 0.05). 4.

Different lactation periods showed extremely significant effects on MFP, MPP, LR, MUN, and SCS ( p < 0.01). 3.1.2.

The results are shown in Table S3 , which shows that the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

In the BF group, daily feed intake showed an extremely significant positive correlation with TAN ( p < 0.01), except for days 21–36.

The protective factors for renal injury exhibit five extremely significant immune cell traits ( P < 0.01), namely central memory CD4 – CD8 – T cell % T cell (OR = 0.007, P = 7.83 × 10 –4 ), CD8 on central memory CD8 + T cell (OR = 0.116, P = 0.003), BAFF-R on IgD – CD38 + B cell (OR = 0.086, P = 0.006), CD4 – CD8 – NK T cell % T cell (OR = 0.068, P = 0.007), and CD25 ++ CD45RA – CD4 + non-regulatory T cell (non-Treg) absolute count (OR = 0.041, P = 0.007).

Statistical significance is considered to be extremely significant if p<0.01, significant if p<0.05, and to have a trend towards statistical significance if 0.05<p<0.1. a–d Mean within a column within a main effect are significantly different.

The mean δ 2 H was significantly different in rice crayfish, pond crayfish, and wild crayfish ( p < 0.05, shown in Figure 2 ), with the rice crayfish and pond crayfish groups showing extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01, shown in Figure 2 ).

In terms of plan quality assessment, the total MU for the H group was significantly higher (1066.704 ± 135.183) than that for the T group (772.992 ± 104.023), with extremely significant statistical differences ( P < 0.01).

The results indicate an extremely significant difference in body size between the large and small pig populations in this study ( P < 0.01, P < 0.001).

The results show that among the test variables used in this study, A (ratio of water to material), B (extraction temperature), and A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant for the extraction rate of EUPS ( p < 0.01).

A higher CV TH may reduce the light available to under-story and mid-story plants in the forest [ 17 , 55 ], which explains the extremely significant negative correlation observed in Figure 7 c ( p < 0.01).