“extremely significant”

Interestingly, whereas there were no significant differences between the individual effects of BCM and fresh bone chips, there was an additive and in most of the cases extremely significant ( P < 0.001) effect of fresh bone chips combined with BCM-coated DBBM on the osteogenic gene expression at all three time points (dark green bars).

Results were considered significant if p<0.05, very significant if p<0.01 and extremely significant if p<0.001.

The difference between the control and the 3 mg/ml dose is statistically extremely significant ( P ≤0.001) ( Fig. 1B ).

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

3.3.3 IL‐6 The model group showed higher expression than that of the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < .001).

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

The differences in abundance among Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) at the phylum level ( Figure 2F ), while at the genus level, the abundance differences among Pseudomonas , Ralstonia , Lechevalieria , Rhodanobacter , Rhodococcus , Bacillus , and Flavobacterium were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

The results showed an extremely significant positive correlation between SAR and AbunR (Fig. 3a ; R 2 = 0.833, P < 0.001), suggesting that the population with higher ‘Space Accessibility’ would occupy more space at t 2 .

The results demonstrated that there was an extremely significant correlation between the expression levels of DLGAP5, BUB1B, KIF20A, KIF2C, KIF11, FOXM1, and TPX2 and survival time ( p < 0.001), a significant correlation existed between the expression of NDC80, NCAPG, PBK, PRC1, and survival time ( p < 0.01), and a weak correlation between the expression of NUSAP1, ASPM, UBE2C, and survival ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 ).

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was highly significant, and P < 0.001 was extremely significant.

Similarly, BLG was the major allergen for serum number 9 and 10 with extremely significant differences ( *** P < 0.001); it was also one of allergens for serum number 7, 8 and 11 with varying degrees of differences (serum number 7 and 11, * P < 0.05; serum number 8, ** P < 0.01).

Compared with FA, FB (FA with 10% DMSO) exhibited very significant differences ( p < 0.01) at T = 30, 90, 120, 240 min, and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) at T = 180 min.

deltoidea show the weakest inhibitory activity, with an extremely significant variation compared to the drugs from the other three Coptis plants (P<0.001).

Daytime temperature treatments had extremely significant effects on the duration of all stages, except for adults (egg, df = 2, χ 2 = 45.602, p < 0.001; larvae, df = 2, χ 2 = 96.213, p < 0.001; pupae, df = 2, χ 2 = 112.745, p < 0.001; adult, χ 2 = 14.083; df = 2; p < 0.01; generation time, df = 2, χ 2 = 169.127, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

Participation R3"Preside over or participate in scientific research projects and patent applications"activities has an extremely significant promoting effect on the improvement of professional abilities ( t = 2.72, p < 0.001).

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

For significance calculations, unpaired Student’s t -test (two sample, unequal variance) was used with the following significance designations: extremely significant ( p < 0.001), highly significant ( p < 0.01), significant ( p < 0.05); not significant ( p > 0.05). 5.

The difference between groups 1 and 3 was extremely significant, and the average of the three groups was 48.16° smaller than that of group 1 ( P < 0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).

The regulatory relationship between paired genes that has extremely significant information transfer changes needs to be selected by us, so we retain the regulatory relationship with p-value < 0.001.

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.

The regression coefficients for both equations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Decision-making efficiency (number of adjustments) Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the main effect of strategy conditions on the number of adjustments was extremely significant ( F (1, 17) = 185.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.91).