“extremely significant”

Compared to group D, the level of BG in group H decreased regularly from (25.38 ± 2.21) mmol/L to (18.01 ± 2.53) mmol/L during five weeks, which showed extremely significant hypoglycaemic effects ( p < 0.01) at the 3rd week.

The effect of test sample size on specificity results was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that these factors might be the main sources of heterogeneity.

The results showed that the level of serum D-dimer in patients with intracranial aneurysms was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01, Figure 1(a) ).

Results Initially, the paraffin sections showed extremely significant differences in the diameter, number, area and density of skeletal muscle fibers of the fetus, child, adult rabbit hind legs ( P < 0.01).

An extremely significant decrease in Aj5-HT4R expression ( p < 0.01), however, was observed in respiratory tree tissue ( Fig. 7A ).

Among the three groups, the M-G scored the highest, the CC-G scored the lowest, and the difference in most items was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) except IS, Hos, and PI ( p < 0.05).

“*” and “**” represent significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), respectively.

Meanwhile, extremely significant differences were noted for lipase and amylase activities ( P < 0.01). 3.2.

Compared with group CK, there were significant differences in group RIP ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences in group B ( P < 0.01).

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

We noted a positive correlation between Mg and K in the five growth stages of CV duck, which showed an extremely significant difference between 0 and 21 days old ( p < 0.01), as well as a significant difference between 35 and 63 days old ( p < 0.05).

As shown in Table 2 , correlation analysis showed that the surface hydrophobicity was negatively related to EAI and ESI and that this appeared to be extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01).

The level of estradiol increased significantly after subject 296 entered the reproductive period, and the difference between the early reproductive stage and the non-breeding stage was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Figure 5 encapsulated the three groups of KEGG pathways that we were more concerned about, which have extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in abundance at various time points.

The values, means ± SD (MS: n = 12, FH: n = 21), in the same row with different lowercase showed statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05) and the values labeled with different capital letters represent extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) according to the Kruskal–Wallis test, the same as below. 2.5.

LSD and Duncan's multiple range tests facilitated multiple comparisons of means, categorizing differences as extremely significant ( p < 0.01), significant ( p < 0.05), or non-significant ( p > 0.05) based on p values. 3 Results 3.1 Growth performance The initial body weight comparison indicated no significant differences between the CON, AGF, MN, and TW groups ( p > 0.05).

IBI showed an extremely significant correlation with Fr ( p < 0.01), while SI showed an unstable correlation with Fr, namely sometimes significant, sometimes extremely significant, and sometimes insignificant.

One unanticipated finding was that multiple ARGs revealed significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) correlations.

Data comparison employed one-way analysis of variance test, with subsequent Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p<0.05 and extremely significant difference p<0.01.

At the age of 84 days, extremely significant interaction effects of the swimming pool conditions and floor types were observed for eye cleanliness, feather cleanliness, and breast blister scores ( p < 0.01), while the interaction effect of feather quality showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

Statistical analysis of the relative mRNA expression level between transcriptomic data and qPCR data was performed using Student’s t-test with SPSS 26.0 (v26) software, and the differences were considered significant when the p value < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when the p value < 0.01 (**). 5.

BHT was used as a positive control, for the DPPH scavenging activity and reducing power, the correlation factor ( R ) was calculated, and the values showed extremely significant correlations ( p < 0.01).

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).

Specifically, a lowercase letter represents a significant difference ( p < 0.05), whereas an uppercase letter represents an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).