“extremely significant”

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Compared with the sleep deprivation group, the cognitive rate was increased in each dose group of Acanthopanax senticosus, and the difference between the high- and medium-dose groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the low-dose group was significant ( p < 0.05).

All data were expressed as mean ± SD and analysed using One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range tests, Dunnett’ s T tests and Student’s T-tests (SPSS Statistics 18.0) to estimate the statistical differences of mean levels among the groups with statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (# or * P < 0.05) and P -value of less than 0.05 was considered extremely significant (# or ** P < 0.01).

The significance threshold was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant threshold was p < 0.01.

Lastly, the rare ginsenoside F2 displayed an extremely significant difference in cell activity measurement results at the concentration of 5 μg/mL ( p < 0.01), with significant differences also observed at 10 and 20 μg/mL ( p < 0.05).

Statistical analysis All data are presented as the mean ± SEM and significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among groups were identified by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test using SPSS 12.0.

The correlation of this model was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the equation fits well with experimental results.

Significant was defined at P < 0.05 and extremely significant defined at P < 0.01.

Statistical significance was considered to be significant ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference compared with TMV, “ ∗ ” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05) and “ ∗∗ ” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01).

Correlation Analysis of Dry Matter Accumulation, Soil Water Storage and Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen, and Soil Enzyme Activity From Table 3 , dry matter accumulation showed significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) positive correlations with organic carbon content, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, sucrase, cellulase, urease and protease activity.

Difference between two groups was determined at a significant difference p < 0.05 or at an extremely significant difference p < 0.01.

Compared with the control group, the difference was extremely significant in the juglone treatment group ( p < 0.01).

The COD Mn , COD, Chl a, TP, TN, and NO 3 -N levels at Taizishan were higher than those at other monitoring sites, and the differences in COD Mn , TN, NO 3 -N and Chl a were significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Table 1 ).

Firstly, follicular cyst follicles had extremely significant lower E 2 , insulin, IGF1 and leptin levels compared with normal follicles ( p < 0.01).

5 ), and there was an extremely significant difference in the blood glucose between before and after anaesthesia in the RSG ( P < 0.01, Fig. 5 ).

Memory B cells, follicular helper T cells, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages, resting mast cells, activated mast cells, plasma cells, and activated NK cells with extremely significant differences between NPC and NCNT ( p < 0.01, Figure 1(c) ) were selected for the following WGCNA analysis. 3.2.

The expression of IRF4 in the spleen and brain of Cherry Valley ducks reached extremely significant differences at 1, 3, 5 dpi with DTMUV ( P < 0.01), and the upregulation reached the maximum on the third day in the spleen (96.5-fold, P < 0.01; Figure 4 A); the maximum upregulation (1,572.4-fold, P < 0.01; Figure 4 B) in the brain at 5 dpi.

According to the results of the significance test, the trend is divided into three levels: extremely significant ( p < 0.01), significant ( p < 0.05), and insignificant ( p ≥ 0.05) [ 9 ]. 2.4.2.

coli K88 infection induced an apparently ( p < 0.05) down-regulated expression of Lf in some tissues (spleen, bone and muscle), but an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) up-regulation in other tissues (liver and kidney) ( Figure 3 A).

IBI showed an extremely significant correlation with Fr ( p < 0.01), while SI showed an unstable correlation with Fr, namely sometimes significant, sometimes extremely significant, and sometimes insignificant.

The differences were regarded as significant at * p < 0.05 and extremely significant at ** p < 0.01 in all cases.

There were extremely significant positive correlations between SOM and STN and SAK ( P < 0.01), and a significant positive correlation between SOM and SAP, with correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.88, and 0.69, respectively.

Comparisons between groups were analyzed with the two-sample Student’s t test, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 and extremely significant as p < 0.01.