“extremely significant”

Significant differences are indicated by “*” (P < 0.05), and extremely significant differences are indicated by “**” (P < 0.01).

The effects of A , B , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 on the TOC removal efficiency are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while those of C , AB , AC , and BC are not significant ( P > 0.05).

The results showed that the mitochondrial membrane potential of the 15% S group was 0.25 ± 0.06 and 0.34 ± 0.05 higher than that of the 20% S group and 5% S group, respectively, with extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

It could be seen from Table 4 that the economic pressure has an extremely significant positive correlation with the thought of recession and self-efficacy ( p < 0.01) and has an extremely significant negative correlation with the objective support and support utilization ( p < 0.01).

** represents extremely significant differences in mean value among different treatments ( P < 0.01).

The VH of the duodenal segment in the LPS + H-MPTA group exhibited an extremely significant increase ( p < 0.01); the VH/CD ratio also increased significantly ( p < 0.01).

Notably, lines OE2, OE4, OE5 and OE6 presented extremely significant overexpression ( P < 0.01), whereas OE3 presented significant upregulation ( P < 0.05) relative to the wild-type controls.

The Spearman’s rank correlation for the researched bacterial genera was greater than 0.7 and was extremely significant (P < 0.01).

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).

In addition, the correlation analysis confirmed that pH was negatively significantly correlated with TN, AN, and NH 4 + -N ( P < 0.05), and there were significant or extremely significant positive relationships among SOC, TN, AN, NH 4 + -N, and AP ( P < 0.01, 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the normal and cancer groups were identified using the DESeq2 package (DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.DESeq2), in which P<0.001 indicated extremely significant, P<0.01 very significant and P<0.05 significant.

It can be seen from the Table 5 that there are extremely significant correlations between some factors (P < 0.01), such as population and GDP.

The migration differences between 12h and 24h for these two groups are significant (P<0.05) and between 48h and 72h are extremely significant (P<0.01).

As shown in Figure 2 , when AE concentration was in the 250–2000 mg/L range, AE promoted SC proliferation after treating for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h; at a concentration of 500–2000 mg/L, cell proliferation in different groups was significantly increased by comparison with control group ( P < 0.05); when the concentrations were 1000 and 2000 mg/L, drug-treated groups showed the extremely significant difference compared to control group ( P < 0.01). 3.3.

P values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.05 significant (*).

The significance of the differences was tested by t -tests or one-way (ANOVA; * , p < 0.05, significant; ** , p < 0.01, extremely significant).

In different river basins, there was a significant correlation between the composition of methanogenic communities in the Yellow River basin and spH ( r = 0.28, p < 0.05), while in the Huangshui River basin, there was an extremely significant correlation with spH ( r = 0.43, p < 0.01).

With the increase of nitrogen fertilization, the canopy nitrogen concentration of summer corn increased, with the concentration under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments differing to an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01), but the difference between N2 and N3 treatments just reached a significant level ( p < 0.05).

Notably, HS had extremely significant effect on linoleic acid metabolic pathway ( p < 0.01) (Figure 6 ), and an influencing trend was observed in the pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism ( p = 0.0502). 4.

Differences were considered significant at P <0.05 (labeled as “ * ” in Figure 2 ) and extremely significant at P <0.01 (labeled as “ ** ” in Figure 2 ).

We found that the C20:5n‐3 of transgenic rabbits was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) (Table S1 ).

The activities in the pH 4 and pH 10 treatment groups reached 4.9 × 10 4 IU/mL and 2.5 × 10 4 IU/mL, respectively, with extremely significant differences (0.001 < p < 0.01, 0.001 < p < 0.01) compared to the pH 7.4 treatment group.

There was an extremely significant difference between the Positive group ( P < 0.01), LSSE groups ( P < 0.05) and the DM group. 3.2.2.