“fell short of significance”

The vehicle and VF 1 mg kg −1 treated group fell short of significance ( P = .069 and .066, resp.) and there was no significant difference among training and test at VF 3 mg kg −1 -treated group ( P = .515). 3.4.

A 2 (age groups) X 2 (language groups) ANOVA on the Day-Night measure revealed a significant age group main effect, F(1,73) = 39.23, p<0.0001, η 2 = 0.350, and a main effect for language group that fell short of significance, F(1,73) = 3.41, p<0.069, η 2 = 0.045.

However, the decline in 'bad news' articles about depression fell short of significance (Mantel-Haenszel χ 2 = 3.29, d.f. = 1, p = 0.07).

The difference between conventional DIR and 3D-T 1 closely approached, but fell short of significance ( P = 0.07).

In a test of the effects of cue concentration and flow regime, cue concentration significantly affected choice (Binomial GLM; z = 2.235, N = 82, p = 0.025) while the effect of water regime fell short of significance (Binomial GLM; z = − 1.814, N = 82, p = 0.070).

There was a moderate size interaction between Time and Perspective that fell short of significance, F (1,41) = 3.46, p = .07, η p 2 = .08.

Geriatric patients were less likely on pre-operative nasal steroids (25% versus 76.2%, p = 0.0001), more likely to be taking anticoagulation (21.2% versus 0%, p = 0.017), and more often hypertensive although this fell short of significance (41.8% versus 20.8%, p = 0.07).

Bipolar I patients tended to be taking more antipsychotic medications than bipolar II patients, but the difference fell short of significance (χ 2 =4.29, p=0.07).

Correlation coefficients between WMS-R story recall and hippocampal volume were of a similar magnitude in the right surgical group, but fell short of significance ( P = 0.07).

Analyzing this further, a three-way (modality: within-modal visual, within-modal haptic, cross-modal visual-haptic and cross-modal haptic-visual; rotation; axis) RM-ANOVA again showed a main effect of object rotation (F 1,23 = 30.04, p = .001) but the axis of rotation was unimportant (F 2,46 = .39, p = .68), and the main effect of modality fell short of significance (F 3,69 = 2.49, p = .07).

Consequently, post hoc comparisons also fell short of significance, although the comparison related to ERN differences between PHOB group ( M = −4.64, SD = 4.22) and HC group ( M = −2.58, SD = 2.68) approached the threshold ( p =0.070).

SPR for Brother John were also significantly correlated with all other rates (from SMT online pre-lab: r (45) = 0.37, p = 0.014) to clapping: r (53) = 0.57, p < 0.001), except walking ( r (49) = 0.26, p = 0.076), and those for Twinkle only fell short of significance with walking rate ( r (50) = 0.26, p = 0.070).

Infected flies also increased sleep at this time, but the increase fell short of significance ( p < .07).

TAS-20 alexithymia showed only a weak negative correlation with MAIA-2 interoceptive sensibility that fell short of significance ( p = .07), but was significantly positively correlated with reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity, and negatively correlated with emotion regulation.

We found that the main effect of the acuity of the AE is significant, sphericity assumed (F (2,98)=14.7, p<0.001) however, the interaction between acuity of the AE and FEM characteristics fell short of significance, sphericity assumed (F (6,98)=2.0, p=0.070).

The main effect of interval fell short of significance, F (1, 15) = 3.66, p >.07, as well as the Interval×Block interaction, F (2, 30) = 3.19, p >.07.

The within-session trend that could be observed for the HF band fell short of significance ( F (1, 113) = 3.38, p = 0.07).

The three-way interaction of Required Response × Gender × Gender Stereotype fell short of significance, F (1, 45) = 3.48, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.07 (see Figure 4 ).

The main effect of participant background fell short of significance, F (1, 260) = 3.29, p = .071, η p 2 = .013.

Differences in the percentage of distance traveled in the central area of the open field, an index of anxiety-relevant behavior, fell short of significance [F(2, 60) = 2.11, P = 0.071] ( Fig. 3C ).

When using Steiger's Z ( Steiger, 1980 ) to compare the magnitude of the correlations between deliberate mind-wandering during slots and boredom proneness, r (109) = 0.047, P = 0.63, and deliberate mind-wandering during the vigilance task and boredom proneness, r (109) = 0.245, P = 0.009, we found that the differences in the magnitude of the correlations approached, but ultimately fell short of significance, Z = 1.80, P = 0.071.

Lactoferrin was significantly raised in scarring in the Gambian cohort (p = 0.0074) and was raised but fell short of significance in the Tanzanian cohort (p = 0.074).

Again, the interaction effect fell short of significance, F (1,3) = 7.283, p = 0.074.

Mixed model analysis of the HARS indicated that there were no significant main or interactive effects of Site or suboxone and the visit:treatment interaction fell short of significance [ F (11, 314) = 1.69, p = 0.075].

The relationship between these two variables just fell short of significance, χ 2 (1) = 3.17 , p = 0.075, continuity corrected, Bayes Factor 10 ( BF 10 ) = 2.852.