“highly significant”

Effects of Grazing on Community-Level Plant Hydraulic Traits Grazing had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on the community-weighted mean (CWM) of six out of the seven hydraulic traits measured; only CWM_C leaf was not significantly affected.

The highly significant fixed intercept indicates that participants kept a comfortable distance to the robot, coeff = 83.03, SE = 5.56, p < .001, 95% CI = [71.77, 94.29].

Overall, there was a strong, highly significant relationship between overall scores in 2012 and 2016 ( Fig 5A ; linear regression model, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.79).

Highly significant dose reductions (p<0.001) were also found for relevant organs of interest adjacent to the scan field (brain -84%, eye lenses -90%) as well as in the direct beam (red bone marrow -20%, salivary glands -84%).

Statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 (4) = 77.7, p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).

There was a highly significant difference in the mean age of participants across the groups ( p < 0.001).

Results Genotypic Variation for Deep Rooting in Aerobic Systems Highly significant ( p < 0.001) genotypic variation existed for deep rooting in the Sherpa/ IRAT109 RIL population with heritability of 0.41 in Experiment 1.

The differences between the two groups were highly significant for all comparisons ( P < 0.001), except for the comparison of the PCT concentrations in bacterial and viral infections with a likely diagnosis based on objective findings.

As shown in Table 6 , all 4 features showed highly significant group differences (all P <.001; df=235) with large effect sizes (Cohen d range: 1.11‐1.19).

Similarly, the Bartlett’s test of sphericity, which provides a measure of the statistical probability that the correlation matrix has significant correlations among some of its components, was highly significant (χ^2 (21) = 30619.604 ( p < 0.001)), thereby confirming that the variables share common variance and are appropriate for factor extraction.

Independently from the fixation technique, the defect size was a main factor that influenced the union time as there was a highly significant correlation between defect size and union-time ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.35).

3 ). Analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of environment (E), genotype (G), and genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) (all P < 0.001), with F-values of 45.22, 3.15, and 26.97, respectively.

Asthma severity was also highly significant (χ 2 = 68.02, p < 0.001), with uncontrolled asthma reported in 42.91% of those with intermittent/mild persistent asthma (combined as “mild cases” for analysis) and 88.79% of those with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (combined as “persistent cases”).

There was a highly significant negative linear trend for the likelihood of liver transplantation with increasing BMI ( p < 0.001).

The p overall and p trend for the RS mutations were both highly significant (p<0.001) demonstrating a clear mutagenic effect, with the exception of the lowest dose tested (0.25 Gy) where no RS mutations were observed.

The DMN activation has been found highly significant on cluster level [ p < 0.001, family-wise error (FWE) corrected for multiple comparisons].

We did observe a highly significant effect of cognitive load on reaction time (RT) in the visual task [ F (2.73, 35.44) = 29.24, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.69] showing that visual target RT increased as a function of cognitive load.

About the flavan-3-ols, the drying method applied exerted a highly significant influence on their content (p < 0.001), with a reduction of FLC in the OD samples of approximately 93 % compared to that of the FD samples, irrespective of the hop variety and extraction technique under consideration ( Fig. 1 b).

The Shannon–Weaver diversity index was very variable between samples and ranged from 0.93 to 5.07; the different sponges showed highly significant differences (ANOVA F 13, 14 = 7.03, p < 0.001; partial-η 2 = 0.87; 1-β = 0.999) (Fig. 3A ), whereas no additional factor significantly affected the alpha–diversity of the sponge microbiome ( p > 0.1).

Short interventions (4–12 weeks) exhibited a highly significant effect (g = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.44; p = 0.001).

It is important to note that adjustment for average daily screen time, as well as for levels of physical activity and sleep quality (as covariates in ANCOVA), did not alter the significance of the results: all between-group differences remained highly significant ( p < 0.001).

For all the tests, DLR fixed effect was highly significant: ( p < 0.001), as shown with violin plots in Fig. 2 (R1 evaluations) and Fig.

A G-test confirmed the asymmetry, showing a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant ( P <0.001) difference between the participation rates in the PEARL practices and that expected from the non-PEARL, with 6914 (54%) participation vs 6543 (51%) expected.

However, the inclusion of a large cohort (n=1012) and the highly significant differences observed between groups (p < 0.001) suggest that the study possessed adequate statistical power to validate the results.