“highly significant”

However, in terms of intensity of sensitization as measured by the size of the skin response, in SPT positive patients, no significant differences between allergic adults and children were noted (two way ANOVA p > 0.05); whereas, as expected, highly significant values were obtained between allergic and non-allergic adults ( p <0.001), and between allergic children and non-allergic adults ( p <0.0001) (Fig. 2 ).

The results were considered significant when p value <0.05 and were considered highly significant when p value <0.001.

Although the difference was lower between the Hb levels at the five-year follow-up compared to the ten-year follow-up, the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This corresponds to a highly significant alteration in HER3 expression ( p < 0.001 for marginal homogeneity) with an up‐regulation of HER3 expression from baseline to surgery in 6/58 (10.3%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 20.8%), and a decrease in response to NET in 23/58 cases (39.7%; 95% CI, 28.1 to 52.5%, Supplementary Table S5 ).

Fusion outcomes Regarding bone fusion, a highly significant overall difference was found among the groups ( P < 0.001).

CSF Differences between the Young and Old Groups A between-observer analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there were highly significant differences in contrast sensitivity between the young and old observers after 50, 100, and 300 quick CSF trials (F(1, 25) = 26.794, 26.230, 29.716; all p < 0.001).

Conversely, negative sentiment appeared nearly twice as frequently in North American videos (47%, n=24) versus international videos (27%, n=6), with this difference being highly significant (X2 (df=1, N=64)=10.86, p=0.001).

Breath hold (BH) improved from pre- to post-intervention, from 37.2 (18.7) to 66.0 (26.9), with a mean change 24.3 (15.3), which was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Binary logistic regression analysis Univariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all of the prognostic clinicopathological scoring systems assessed (ASA, MGC, APACHE II, SIRS, EWS), measured on all 3 days, showed highly significant associations with severity of pancreatitis, adverse outcome and mortality (all p < 0.001; Table 4 ).

Barlett's test for non-sphericity was highly significant (p < 0,001).

Notably, MKI67, a well‐recognized marker of cell proliferation, was highly enriched in tumor tissues with highly significant upregulation (*** p < 0.001, Figure 8E ), providing strong molecular evidence for the heightened proliferative activity characteristic of tumor cells.

Both groups showed significantly improved overall TDE performance, with the effects being highly significant in the medicated group ( P <0.001).

Patients with non-luminal breast cancer (HER2-positive and triple-negative) were more inclined to present focal edema than those with luminal breast cancer with a statistically highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 b and d).

For both cell lines the highly significant (p<0.001) suppression of BRG1 expression was determined by qRT-PCR ( Fig 3A ).

We found that the linear correlation in the window centered at 400 ms after the report of the onset of the dominant percept was already highly significant ( z -value = 3.286, p -value < 0.001, Fig. 4b ).

The depths avowed more highly significant (p < 0.001) SOC stocks in topsoils (0–30 cm depth) than that of the subsoils (30–60 cm depth) in the two cropping systems.

It demonstrated highly significant anxiolytic activity (69.2 ± 1.22 head dipping, *** p < 0.001) in comparison to the control, shown in Figure 5B .

The presence of BCG scar and the availability of immunization cards were highly significant indicators of immunization coverage ( P < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was 0.86 indicating very good sampling adequacy and the Bartletts test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating there was enough relationship between variables to perform the PCA.

Furthermore, the sample adequacy measure analyzed by the KMO statistic reached a result of 0.812 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), thus verifying the suitability of carrying out a PFA.

The ANOVA results were highly significant, F(1, 72) = 262.37, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.785, indicating a large effect size, with 78.5% of the variance in external locus of control attributable to the intervention.

NO 3 − ‐N concentrations remained relatively stable across seasons, while NH 4 + ‐N was significantly elevated in summer and autumn, showing highly significant differences compared to winter and spring ( p < 0.001).

When BRI is ≥3.7, its association with sarcopenia is stronger and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Generalized additive modeling of gamma richness across elevation bands revealed a highly significant non‐linear effect of elevation (df = 2.92, χ 2 = 82.78, p < 0.001), explaining 85.5% of the deviance.

A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, p<0.01 highly significant and p<0.001 extremely significant.