“highly significant”

These results were all highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Notably, as predicted by the microarray data ( Table I ), the qRT-PCR data ascertained that the inverse relationship between N- myc expression and miR-17 levels was highly significant (R 2 =0.98; P<0.001) ( Fig. 1A ).

The between‐group difference after intervention was highly significant after adjustment for baseline values, changes in energy, and protein intake ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ). 3.5.

This approach yielded highly significant common scale parameters ( p < 0.001), as indicated by the lower AIC value, effectively capturing the variability in nymph development with respect to temperature.

However, when the RRM was used, the genetic sire variance component was highly significant ( P -values <0.001) in the FZTDU and DU6 lines, but not in the two high-fecundity lines.

There was a highly significant relationship between cross‐sectional values between the two methods ( r = 0.98, P < 0.001).

As shown in Figure 2A , among 132 eyes, although all patients had reached the refractive threshold of high myopia, the axial length (AL) of the eyes did not stabilize but showed a highly significant positive linear correlation with age (Pearson r = 0.485, P < 0.001).

Using dichotomous (breast-fed or not) outcomes, we found highly significant associations between how they had been fed and future intentions for Scottish (χ 2 (1) =52.3, p < .001); Nordic (χ 2 (1) = 24.6, p < .001); and USA (χ 2 (1) = 19.4, p < .001) participants.

3.2 The DQ8 marker The DQ8 allele exhibited a highly significant association ( X 2 = 10.24; p = 0.001), reinforcing its established role in the predisposition to gluten-related immune dysregulation.

On the syndrome level, by contrast, our quantitative analysis revealed highly significant similarities ( p < 0.001) between the syndrome profiles of index cases of the “Schizophrenia Cluster” ( n = 136) and the syndrome profiles of their affected first-degree relatives ( n = 116) (Fig. 1 ).

When the distribution of the three psychological distress categories (anxiety, depression, and somatization) was compared between catastrophizers and non-catastrophizers, the difference was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001; Table 1 ).

The dimensions exhibited statistically highly significant sexual dimorphism ( P ≤0.001).

The VO 2max (ml/kg/min) of males and females was 55.41±9.45 and 39.91±3.14, respectively, the gender difference being highly significant ( p <0.001).

The difference calculated came out to be highly significant p <0.001 ( Table II - III ).

For both the parameters, differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The AUC (0.806), Highly significant difference between the studied groups ( P < 0.001), sensitivity (73.33%) and specificity (86.67%) in Table 4 and (ROC)-curve analyses, Fig. 2 , demonstrated its good diagnostic value.

The association between the prevalence of LVD and the initial diagnosis/differential diagnosis was highly significant ( p <<0.001) whereas none of the other associations attained statistical significance ( Table 6 ).

2009 ; http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/databases-core_collections_wr.php )—showed that the difference among the groups was highly significant for both the traits ( P < 0.001; Fig. 2b ).

Suppression of TNFα or IL-1β was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The effect of time was highly significant ( p < 0.001), but, the difference between the versions was not.

Repeatability testing demonstrated highly significant inter ( k + 0.86, p < 0.001) and intra ( k = 0.74, p < 0.001) observer (intra-class) correlation coefficients ( k ).

The addition of the FHS gave a highly significant improvement to risk models containing binary family history ( P < 0.001), the number of relatives with breast cancer ( P = 0.001), the type of relative with breast cancer ( P < 0.001), and the age of relative at breast cancer diagnosis ( P = 0.01).

However, in a multivariate regression analysis with gestational age and antenatal steroids as the independent variables and change in LVMI as the dependent variable within the preterm group, gestational age remained highly significant ( P =0.001), whereas exposure to antenatal steroids was not significant ( P =0.67).

Conversely, for delayed PONV, postoperative antiemetic administration remained a highly significant independent factor ( p < 0.001, OR = 9.567).

In WT, 65%–68% of clean RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reads could be mapped to transcripts of the Lodz University reference genome ( 26 ), while the rates were lower in ATSec (59%–66%) - a highly significant overall difference ( P < 0.001)—indicating that ATSec is genetically more distant to the reference than WT.