On statistical analysis using Post-Hoc tukey HSD test for multiple comparisons, the mean TBS of group II test samples was higher than group I and the difference was found to be statistically highly significant (p < 0.001∗∗).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Additional checks indicated that all responses were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The BT term was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) when incorporated into the models for all species except American plaice and golden redfish.
The results indicated that the composite reliability (CR) of all items or sub-constructs was above 0.7 and highly significant at the p = 0.001 level, and the average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.525 to 0.812, which was highly above the recommended criterion of 0.50.
The main effect of the dose was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
3,4,5-TMBS, however, displayed no significant difference in COX-2 inhibition relative to ibuprofen at 1 μM but demonstrated a highly significant increase in inhibition ( p < 0.001) at 50 μM.
In the second regression model predicting career-related decision-making self-efficacy from proactive personality, generative artificial intelligence acceptance, innovation competency, and the interaction term between generative artificial intelligence acceptance and innovation competency, the overall model was highly significant, accounting for 58.5% of the variance in career-related decision-making self-efficacy ( R 2 = 0.585, F = 174.985, p < 0.001).
lucens and the other forage species was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
59 Comparing the two distinct reference curves for fortified and nonfortified wines, it is obvious that the activity range 137 Cs is more limited for fortified wines, exhibiting the lowest activity of all the samples under study (highly significant difference p < 0.001).
Results There was a highly significant moderate agreement κ = 0.461 ** ( p < 0.001; Bonferroni-corrected p -value [ p B ] = 0.006) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.281–0.642) between the RULA scores assessed by both technologies.
Using the spearman correlation coefficient, testing of NLR and ChE revealed a highly significant inverse correlation, with a coefficient of −0.303 ( p < 0.001).
Both predictors demonstrated highly significant associations with mSLI ( p < 0.001), with their smooth terms exhibiting a consistent upward trend.
Clinically, a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) was found between the presence of the vacA gene and emetic syndrome.
The sample adequacy for factor analysis resulted in a value of 0.834, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity resulted in a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001).
The difference in the increase in fluorescence intensity was statistically highly significant ( p -value < 0.001).
After 24 h of growth, ATc-induced drcAB expression caused a highly significant loss (83.33%; P < 0.001) of the initial DAP concentration (Fig. 2 ; Fig.
In the case of the SCB14-16 data set, the analysis determined that the FA-2 model accounted for a remarkable 100% of the G × E variance, with a highly significant p < 0.001.
A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant (p-value <0.05 (statistically significant), p-value <0.01 (highly significant), p-value <0.001 (very highly significant)).
We specifically selected 10 hallmark gene sets that showed highly significant differences (P < 0.001) or played crucial roles in tumor progression, presenting group comparisons in Fig. 4 B.
Results indicates a highly significant difference between the two (χ 2 = 19.39, p < 0.001), indicating that the relative impact of trust in technology on i-vote is significantly larger than that of trust in government.
Attrition Within Trajectory Groups Attrition during follow-up, defined as no valid year 6 uACR measurement ( Table 2 ), was highly significant by trajectory group ( P < .001).
This difference was highly significant (p≥0.001).
There was marginally significant clustering at the kebele level (p = 0.03) and highly significant clustering at the infant level (p < 0.001).
Statistical significance was p < 0.05, with highly significant results reported as p < 0.001.
Pearson's correlation analysis between social participation and CES‐D showed a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.377, p < 0.001), indicating that depression increased with an increase in social participation difficulty.