“highly significant”

There was a highly significant increase in pH in the TS group (mean pH 6.24 in the RIFA nest compared to 4.72 in the control group ( p < 0.001)).

There were highly significant line and environment effects for all traits ( P < 0.001) and a genotype × environment interaction was significant for all traits except palmitic acid and plant height ( P < 0.01).

Sensitivity analysis revealed that this result was strongly influenced by GSE185263 : after excluding this study, the association became highly significant (SMD ≈ -0.90, P < 0.001) with reduced heterogeneity, whereas removal of other studies yielded non-significant P-values.

Any cardiovascular event was documented in 37.8% of subjects from the low-risk group, 44.4% in the moderate-risk group, and 73.5% in the high-risk group, with the trend being statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The results show a highly significant difference for Pfk activity ( p < 0.001) between the two groups.

Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05, with highly significant results flagged at p < 0.001.

Univariate test results revealed a highly significant and substantial main effect of Group on recognition speed [ F (2, 82) = 22.59, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.355].

The difference is large and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This effect is not significant for “light smokers” relative to “never smokers”, while it became highly significant for “heavy smokers” relative to “never smokers” (OR = 4.638, p < 0.001).

Responses of net primary productivity and relative growth rate to different grazing intensities in a herbaceous marsh wetland Grazing intensity exerted a highly significant effect on aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) (F 2,42 = 27.21, P < 0.001) ( Figure 4A ).

Paired statistical tests confirmed that differences between CK and 150 NaCl were all highly significant (p < 0.001).

The error in the up‐sampled populations (AFQUP and WBUP) is decreased compared to the initial sets (AFQ and WB) for each subject, and comparison at the group level shows a highly significant decrease in the mean NRMSE between AFQ and AFQUP and between WB and WBUP (paired samples, p < .001).

To further account for the distributional characteristics of the data, a generalized linear model (GLM) with a Gamma distribution and log link function was applied, which confirmed a highly significant treatment effect (Wald χ2 = 131.11, df = 3, p < 0.001).

RNA ISH results correlated positively with IHC results ( p <0.05, r S =0.625; figure 3 B; see also table 1 ), and correlation with microarray data was highly significant ( p <0.001, r S =0.861; figure 3 C). 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203798.supp5 Supplementary file Discussion Here we report two methods for the detection of KCNJ3 in archived FFPE human breast cancer tissue.

In contrast, a highly significant number of participants (18/20) favored complex strokes for their whole system gestures (two-tailed exact binomial test, p < 0.001).

Global spatial clustering of positive holdings was highly significant (nearest-neighbour ratio = 0.39, z = –8.26, p < 0.001), with elevated density along coastal agricultural corridors.

Irrespective of the definition, PSP is the only biomarker to demonstrate a highly significant interaction between time and group (septic versus non-septic), with a p value of <0.001.

Neither genetic group nor the interaction of genetic group and pea genotype were significant, whereas pea genotype showed to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The differences exhibited between the populations were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

Nuclear size, nuclear texture, and nuclear density parameters were highly significant in differentiating between benign and malignant cases ( P < 0.001 for all of them).

The ANOVA results indicated a highly significant effect of mangrove stand type on AGB ( p < 0.001).

Post-RT evaluations are demonstrated in ( Table 4 ), A highly significant improvement in the IPSS was observed, with a reduction in the median score from 11 to 5 ( p < 0.001).

By designating the distinct generic clades as foreground branches, we unequivocally identified a highly significant signal of positive selection ( p < 0.001) acting exclusively on the ycf1 gene within the Pinalia lineage.

The reduction involved both the ipsilateral and the contralateral eyes relative to the lesion, with highly significant differences (i.e., p < 0.001 in several studies) [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].

The comparison between the IGs and age in four categories model showed to be highly significant, as well as it was the interaction between age and IGs (p<0.001).