“highly significant”

Likewise, a marked variation in weight gain was recorded over time, with the day-to-day effect being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

coagulans with immobility times 2.2 s, 5.5 s, and 7.4 s with decreasing concentration in a highly significant manner ( p < 0.001).

Histomorphometry revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the germinal epithelium thickness between the breeding and non-breeding seasons.

The difference in diploid and aneuploid DNA pattern (the ploidy state) between group 1 and group 2A or group 2B and between group 2A and group 2B and the hyperdiploid aneuploidy and the tumorigenesis was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001).

The data showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the total amino acids, total essential amino acids, and total nonessential amino acids of N. oceanica between the different treatments.

Comparison of the unsupervised clustering from the total cohort and the bone cohort, showed highly significant overlap ( p < 0.001).

We found a highly significant effect of electrode site on saccade direction (p ≪ 0.001, F = 84.14, d.f. = 3, see Fig. 2 ), but also the stimulation current impacted the direction (p < 0.001, F = 16.39, d.f. = 1) as well as the interaction of current and electrode (p < 0.001, F = 6.94, d.f. = 3), indicating that the rotational change induced by a higher current was not consistent across electrodes.

The platelet count also showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001), with group D having the lowest platelet count (288.83 × 103/mm3), significantly lower than groups A ( p = 0.002), B ( p = 0.009), and C ( p = 0.002).

This comparison was highly significant (McNemar χ 2 (1) = 2.889; p < 0.001).

The relationship between AI Transparency and Employee Trust is highly significant ( r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the relationship between AI Transparency and Algorithmic Justice is also very strong ( r = 0.72; p < 0.001).

This showed a highly significant difference in the two groups (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.001), [ Table 4 ].

PERMANOVA further revealed highly significant differences in community structure among treatments ( R2 = 0.6858, P = 0.001).

A two-sample t -test confirmed that this difference in the percentage of retained data was highly significant [ t (132) = −27.66, p < 0.001].

The model intercept was negative and highly significant (β = −148.30, SE = 10.64, z = −13.94, p < 0.001), providing the baseline for interpreting the effects of sex, region, and time.

In contrast, transversion frequencies exhibit the opposite trend (Table S5 ): means are significantly higher in tropical taxa in two nucleotide substitution classes (Table S6 ), and differences in the mean rates of accumulation are highly significant ( F = 14.9; df 1 = 1; df 2 = 156; p < 0.001).

For example, differences in mean scores relating to ‘Cleanliness and Facilities’, ‘Open and Friendliness’ and ‘Compassion and Kindness’ were highly significant (p<0.001), with women with disabilities rating these as better than women without disabilities.

In the figure, three stars (***) indicate highly significant overexpression ( P < 0.001), two stars (**) represent moderate significance ( P < 0.01), while a single star (*) denotes relatively lower but statistically significant expression differences ( P < 0.05).

The increase in Denali winter accumulation is highly significant (p < 0.001) in both Denali ice cores based on comparison of the winter means from 1870–1900 and 1980–2010, and a non-parametric Thiel-Sen robust linear regression 22 .

The results indicated a highly significant (p < 0.001) attenuation of ROS production in GSTO1-1 deficient BMDMs (Fig. 3f ).

The within-population variation among gut samples ( n = 8 to 12 individuals per population) was marginally nonsignificant (SS = 0.527; pseudo- F = 1.4396, P = 0.062), while the variance between fish populations from different rivers was highly significant (SS = 9.566; pseudo- F = 2.9037, P < 0.001).

The overall time effect was highly significant ( F = 156.234, p < 0.001).

The between-condition difference in slopes was highly significant (t(4102) = 3.39, p < 0.001; Fig. 6 B), consistent with a progressive reduction of EEG variability prior to self-initiated actions.

In the propensity-matched cohort, BMI ≥25.2 kg/m 2 remained a highly significant predictor of complications, with a consistent and robust effect magnitude (adjusted OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.32–4.84, p <0.001).

The proportion of submicroscopic infections and parasite prevalence by microscopy exhibited a strong and highly significant inverse correlation (R = -0.840, P <0.001, S2B Fig ).

The interaction between Age and Laughter Type was highly significant as well ( F (2, 174) = 7.70, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.08).