The one-way ANOVA model confirmed highly significant between-group variation (F = 28.7, p < 0.001), with the transitional phase accounting for 63% of the total variance.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The final model was highly significant, F(12, 255) = 68.41, p < 0.001, explaining 76.4% of the total variance (R 2 = 0.764).
GraphPad Prism 9.5 software was used for plotting, and statistical significance was expressed as * p ≤ 0.05, indicating significance; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; *** p ≤ 0.001, extremely significant; **** p ≤ 0.0001; ns, there is no significant difference. 5.
The Chi-square test revealed a highly significant association between dietitians’ baseline knowledge and their self-reported clinical practices ( p < 0.001).
By day 13, the reduction in OD 600 for these doses was highly significant compared to the untreated control ( p ≤ 0.001).
The reduction was highly significant when compared with the control group ( p < 0.001), confirming effective induction of leukopenia.
However, gender was a highly significant predictor of E. coli ESBL status (p < 0.001), with males disproportionately represented in the ESBL-positive group (70, 70.70%) compared to females (29, 29.29%) (Table 2 ).
Conversely, 75% of guardians with a high level of education prioritized the posterior sector (function), indicating a highly significant association between academic background and functional awareness ( p < 0.001; Table 5 ).
At 25 and 50 μM, viability was reduced by 94.6% and 88.8%, respectively, and both effects were highly significant versus DMSO and TMZ ( p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 5 B).
Unweighted UniFrac distance analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001; Figure 5 C) in phylogenetic communities across all groups.
Moreover, the boiling process had a pronounced effect on vitamin retention, with all measured vitamins indicating highly significant decreases ( p = 0.001).
Placental release of 8-Isoprostane is about twice as high in women with GDM compared with women who have healthy pregnancies, with this elevation being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Notably, a highly significant interaction between salt and nitrite was observed (Pillai’s Trace = 0.72, F(2,43) = 54.8, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.72), indicating that the combined influence of these factors was a dominant driver of early stage microbial dynamics.
Addressing H4, a significant main effect of body image profile (F(3, 931) = 14.90, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.046) was found for controlled eating motivation, alongside a highly significant interaction effect between body image profile and sex (F(3, 931) = 6.22, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.020).
When comparing the overall binary AI outputs (presence/absence of abnormality), McNemar’s test revealed a highly significant difference between OPG and CBCT (χ 2 = 16.06, p < 0.001).
The overall association was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a nonlinear component also reaching statistical significance ( p < 0.001), indicating that the relationship is not simply linear.
The Linear Mixed-Effects Model (LMM) analysis for longitudinal NRS data demonstrated a highly significant main effect for time ( p < 0.001).
Our regression model revealed a highly significant time main effect (β=15.10, 95% CI 13.96‐16.25; P <.001), indicating that a substantial increase in maternal weight occurs as pregnancy progresses.
Model 3 (AHEAD): When the AHEAD score was included, it emerged as a powerful and highly significant predictor of heart failure (OR = 1.786, 95% CI: 1.522–2.097, p < 0.001).
The difference was highly significant (log-rank P<0.001).
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed highly significant differences in OS between the two groups (log-rank test, P<0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
Moreover, among female participants, menopausal status demonstrated a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001). 3.2 Screening of metabolic biomarkers We analyzed the associations between 3381 metabolites and Z-/T-score using univariate linear regression.
Both sine and cosine terms were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating strong seasonal fluctuations in mosquito density, with reductions corresponding to specific phases of the year.
After year 7, all three panel positions showed highly significant SOM enrichment ( p < 0.001), with response magnitudes following the order UP > FL > BP.
The group‐by‐time interaction was highly significant (F(4, 281.005)=96.985, p<0.001).