Moreover, highly significant differences were found when comparing accumulation of each HM in snail hepatopancreas with that in foot (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb: p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The log-rank test for equality of survival curves was highly significant at P = 0.001.
In girls the difference was highly significant (18.3% of the 11 yo, vs. 25.5% of the 15 yo; p<0.001 among age groups).
Conclusions Our study shows an important, highly significant accumulation of the heterogeneous genotype of the Sirt1 SNP A2191G (Ile → Val) when compared with healthy controls ( P <0.001).
Changes in these renal hemodynamic parameters were all highly significant after the addition of ramipril, and the decline in RVR was exaggerated compared with the response to aliskiren monotherapy (repeated-measures ANOVA, P < 0.001; Table 3 ).
The combination of P276-00 and gemcitabine showed highly significant apoptosis of 25.4% and 73% at 96 h and 120 h respectively as compared to either drug alone ( p < 0.001).
The differences are significant: likelihood ratio tests for models of b t , including a random effect to capture mouse to mouse variation, and accounting for temporal autocorrelation (fitted with lme in the nlme package in R) reveal a highly significant interaction between ‘day’ and ‘clone’ (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 2410, d.f. = 119, p < 0.001).
For a set of oocytes from a single frog, sustained inward current after washout of AM546 for K69C expressing oocytes averaged −129±13 nA (N = 9), which was a highly significant increase (p<.001, Paired T-test, final vs. initial holding current).
Therefore, we pooled mild and severe group together and compared with asymptomatic control, which came out to be highly significant [χ 2 1 = 35.8; OR = 3.566, 95% CI = 2.348–5.416 p<0.001] ( Table 4 ).
Brain size and tool use We find a highly significant correlation between body mass and brain size in Corvus (P < 0.001 Figure 3 ) both for the combined dataset and when analyzing the individual datasets from Mlikovsky [ 47 ] and Iwanuik & Nelson [ 48 ].
As for KRAS , such a heterogeneous distribution of PIK3CA mutations was found highly significant [p<0.001 (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.36-2.55); p normalized scientific notation = 5.9 x 10 -4 ].
In particular, the differences between the negative control and the positive control, intravenous PGE2, and intraligamentous PGE2 groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while the difference between the negative control and the submucosal PGE2 groups was less pronounced ( p < 0.05).
Pain assessment in patients showed highly significant change from baseline VAS score to 4 th week of the therapy in gabapentin groups ( P <0.001) as compared to placebo.
There was a highly significant effect of genotype on tolerance, as indicated (***, p<0.001), and also of pre-exposure duration, as well as a significant interaction between genotype and pre-exposure duration (two-way ANOVA; n = 4 (30 min and 50 min pre-exposure) or 8 (40 min pre-exposure).
With ′t′ value of 6.7 which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) and percentage reduction was 22.1%.
To confirm this interpretation, we first subtracted ratings during the viewing of neutral pictures from ratings during the negative pictures for each instruction and then compared these difference terms, which resulted in a highly significant difference, p <.001 ( Fig. 2B ).
Statistical results with a p-value p<0.05 are considered as significant, such with p<0.01 as highly significant, and such with p<0.001 as very highly significant.
In a study done by El Baz et al [ 16 ], the malignant cases showed a highly significant increase in the mean percentage of expression of Fas in tissue compared to the chronic cystitis ( P < 0.001) group.
We observed a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction of ERα binding at all sites examined in RAD21-depleted MCF7 cells ( Figure 6A ), and a similar decrease in ERα binding at ERE 1 and the promoter region in T47D cells ( Figure 7 ).
Correlations between individual experiments were all positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) and showed ranges r = 0.44–0.53, 0.37–0.63, and 0.50–0.65 for the DTd, FTd, and HTd populations, respectively.
Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of treatment ( F 1,9 =6.11, P =0.035) and a highly significant treatment × time interaction ( P <0.001).
For example, at K = 9 the majority of variation (94.32%) is among groups, although 0.03% of variation at the level of among populations within groups still represents highly significant population structuring in the remaining population groups ( P < 0.001).
Symptoms, Mental and Functional), the functional domain remained in the Poisson-model with a highly significant contribution (p=0.001).
If the model containing more factors had an improved fit that was highly significant ( P < 0.001), then the factor was retained in the final model.
A total of 72 KEGG pathways showed highly significant enrichment (P <0.001) in this analysis (Table 2 ).