“highly significant”

Contingency table analysis between glomerular sclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis showed a highly significant association (χ 2 = 19.1, p = 0.001).

In the post-treatment, highly significant differences were absorbed in both evaluation methods ( P < 0.001).

Two one-way ANOVAs demonstrated the effect of level to be highly significant ( p < .001) whereby the rated effort decreased linearly with increasing level when listening with CI, F (1, 14) = 28.3, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.7, as well as bimodally, F (1, 14) = 58.7, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.8.

Statistical evaluation Statistical significance of probes was evaluated by ANOVA using a two-tailed Tukey-Kramer approach for multiple comparisons (highly significant ***p < 0.001; very significant **p < 0.01; significant *p < 0.05; not significant (ns) p > 0.05).

The study included MDD patients ( n = 744) and healthy controls ( n = 793), and found a highly significant decreased levels of TRP in depressed patients vs controls ( p < 0.001).

One way ANOVA test showed a highly significant effect of treatment on the body weight gain in the different animal groups (F = 61.88, p < 0.001).

This effect was apparent after 2 week of CUMS and became highly significant from 3 week to the end.( Fig 2 ) Sucrose preference test In the SPT, ANOVA revealed a significant effect of CUMS (1 h: F (1,78) = 414.40, p < 0.001;12 h: F (1,78) = 55.12, p < 0.001; 24 h: F (1,78) = 37.15, p < 0.001) and week (1 h: F (5,390) = 47.70, p < 0.001; 12 h: F (5,390) = 42.59, p < 0.001; 24 h: F (5,390) = 17.88, p < 0.001) and a significant interaction between the factors week and CUMS(1 h: F (5,390) = 41.23, p < 0.001; 12 h: F (5,390) = 30.95, p < 0.001; 24 h: F (5,390) = 12.60, p< 0.001).

Statistically results are highly significant (p < 0.001).

Within the follow-up time of 4.5 years for this study, there was a highly significant difference in the risk of future retinal pathology between groups, both for same eye and the other eye ( P ≥0.001 and P =0.001).

However, NLG at 1/2× MICs (0.125 mg/L) was highly significant in preventing the formation of biofilm compared to the control ( P <0.001), and NELG-1 at 0.5 mg/L also exhibited significantly higher biofilm prevention compared to the control ( P <0.01).

It decreased significantly between P1 and P2-P4; with GAG content at P1 approximately double that of P2 ( p = 0.004 NRX, p = 0.013 HYP) and highly significant when compared to P3 and P4 (all p < 0.001).

The bioimpedance parameters R and S showed marked variability, particularly in the case of S (R mean = 15.9, standard deviation [SD] 11.0; S mean = 82.1, SD 108.9) and there was a highly significant correlation between R and S (R = 0.918, P < 0.001), hence the ratio of R/S was used for subsequent analysis.

For pharmaceutical expenditure, the fall in slope for test patients was highly significant ( P <.001), while control patients showed a marginally significant ( P =.046) increase in slope.

They reveal highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across all factors, except between the three intensity components, although a significant interaction did however occur between intensity component × velocity.

Splenocytes from mice immunized with multivalent DNA vaccines pV273- sod , pV278- sod, or pV273-278- sod significantly increased IFN- γ production after being stimulated with 2 or 10 μ g/ml of recombinant proteins, reaching highly significant P values when compared to control groups PBS and pVAX ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 3(a) ).

64 65 66 The four anthelmintic drugs investigated showed highly significant superiority (all P<0.001) over placebo (the average cure rate with placebo was 12.7% (95% confidence interval 6.7% to 22.7%; table 1 ).

Interestingly, in this assay, expression of both wild-type and A53T α-syn resulted in a time-dependent and highly significant decrease of the chymotrypsin-like 20S/26S UPS activity ( Fig 4A , p<0.001).

When adjusted for influential variables, the baseline differences in the least-squares mean values between patients with and without GI events were highly significant (−0.05 for the EQ-5D utility score, P < 0.001, and −5.61 for the VAS, P < 0.001; Table 2 ).

The decrease of the MMSE scores in the gout patients as compared with the controls was highly significant ( P < .001, adjusted by age, BMI, education, and emotional disorder).

For patient 28 the difference between the means for the 2 sides was highly significant (p<0.001 on Grubb’s test, and outside the outer fence on Tukey’s test), indicating that this patient was an outlier from the other patients in terms of side variation.

The effect of RWI two years prior (RWI_Lag2) was most important in 2002 ( t = 5.09; P < 0.001, but was also highly significant in 2003 ( t = 3.59; P < 0.001), two years after the drought event.

Further, DMI showed a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) with ADG (r = 0.65), initial BW (r = 0.68), final BW (r = 0.82) and MBW (r = 0.77), and moderate correlation ( P < 0.001) with FCR (r = 0.54).

The plasma activity of Cp over time showed a highly significant decrease in samples stored at room temperature and at refrigeration at 4 °C ( P < 0.001, Table 2 ).

In the final models, transfer DOL remained a highly significant (OR per day = 1.018, CI 95 1.014, 1.022, P < 0.001) predictor of colonization with any ARO.

All pairwise F ST values of genetic differentiation were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and showed that the offspring were differentiated from the cultivated roadside trees (0.062 and 0.059, respectively; Table 2 ), but not from the native adults (0.004 and 0.005, respectively; Table 2 ).