“highly significant”

This difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001).

Serum levels of calcium and the calcium/phosphorus ratio were decreased, and phosphorus levels were increased, which were highly significant (p < 0.001) in patients with RA compared to healthy controls (Jambale and Halyal 2017 ).

Detailed analysis (Figure 3 ) showed that the UV effect on both sWUE and eWUE was nonsignificant ( p > 0.05) under saturating ( > 1000 μmol m –2 s –1 ) intensities of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), but highly significant ( p < 0.001) under non‐saturating PAR intensities.

Fourth-year students exhibited a pronounced increase in very severe depression levels, with 83.3 % of students falling into this category, a difference that was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 and Fig. 2 ). 3.3.

Maxillary third molars accounted for most alveolar bone-loss cases, whereas mandibular molars were responsible for the majority of caries and apical radiolucencies; these location-based differences were highly significant ( P < .001).

ICU admission also revealed a highly significant difference between survivors (20 out of 84) and non-survivors (10 out of 16), with a p-value of <0.001, as shown in Table 3 .

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in both factors (“group” and “time”) (p<0.001).

While our findings were highly significant ( P < .001 for pTT-TG and dTT-TG), the correlation was weak to moderate ( r = –0.40 for pTT-TG and r = –0.593 for dTT-TG).

The mean age of the alcohol users was 35.16 ± 10.2 compared to the opioid users, whose mean age was 26.09 ± 5.65, and this difference was found to be, statistically, highly significant ( P < 0.001).

From Table 2 it can be seen that, the maximum number of girls, that is, 237 out of 698 girls (33.95%) experienced dysmenorrhea every month, and 118 (16.90%) experienced it in most of the months, and it was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

Results We found a highly significant and strong positive linear relationship between dose and response around 100 MU: r (3) = 1.0, p <.001 (see Fig. 1 a).

In both cases, the lower bound of the 90% CI was well above 125%, confirming a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in CBD exposure with the enhanced capsule.

Highly significant ( P < 0.001) impacts were recorded due to supplementary inclusion on crude protein intake values.

+ β 2 Y e a r t + β 3 S a l e s R a n k i t * Y e a r t + β 4 G r o c e r y i t + β 5 P r i c e i t + β 6 F e a t u r e i t + β 7 D i s p l a y i t + α 1 : 31 C a t e g o r y c + ε i t The empirical results (see Table 4 ) strongly support the model free evidence as there are positive and highly significant (p < .001) interaction effects between sales rank and year in all three model specifications.

Race interaction: highly significant (overall p < 0.001).

The analysis of variance confirms that this is highly significant both combined (p < 0.001) and individually ( Table 4 ).

Each of these estimates was highly significant (p < 0.001, tested by permutation of individual plants among all varieties).

Additionally, there was a highly significant association between the occurrence of malignancy and age in anti-TIF1-γ positive IIM patients (p < 0.001) (data not shown).

Furthermore, pairwise comparisons found no significant reduction in difficulty for non-musicians when the visual display was present (p = .11), and a highly significant reduction for non-musicians (p<.001).

The difference between the urge in the two conditions was highly significant ( t (20) = -10.901, p < 0.001).

All factors were highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the interaction between Stage and Trait.

The remaining items presented highly significant p values (p≤0.001), as shown in table 1 .

The correlation between pairwise distance and phonological overlap was highly significant (given the large number of word pairs: r = -.25, p < .001) and was strong even among words with 4 or fewer shared onset phonemes ( r = -.25, p < .001).

Education emerged as the most highly significant factor ( P <.001), with a positive coefficient (0.3113).

In NAF condition, there was a highly significant negative association between k values and the mean of the absolute values of ΔF2 for each PWS and each place of articulation ( r = −0.636, p < 0.001 for Pearson product-moment uncorrected scores, based on 63 observations).