“highly significant”

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).

We found a highly significant increase in PI3K pathway signaling from CAH to EEC grade 1 (p<0.001).

The mid-domain effect’s estimate was highly significant (p < 0.001) and positive ( Table 1 ).

Spearman rank correlation was also highly significant between Cx43 and CD21 expression (rho = 0.981, P < 0.001), supporting the colocalization of these proteins.

We also found a positive, highly significant correlation between sucrose intake and Psd95 expression (r=0.587, P <.001), whereas no correlations were found for Syn1 (r=0.252, P <.05) or Gfap (r=0.312, P <.05) mRNA levels ( supplementary Figure S1c, d, e ).

Results showed that both linear and robust regressions were highly significant (linear regression: beta = 0.60, p = 0.001, effect size = 0.94; robust regression: beta = 0.20, p = 0.004) thus indicating that the internal connectivity of the identified regions significantly correlated with discounting behavior.

This is illustrated in our study where the proportion of EM T cells within the CD8 + population in the total group of MS patients (32.5%) was the same as in the healthy control group (33.3%) despite the presence of a highly significant reduction in the frequency of CD8 + EM T cells in the PBMCs in the MS group ( p = 0.001; Table 3 ).

In terms of TGRWT, the main focus of this study, there was a highly significant negative correlation in Ob_09 (−0.36, p<0.0010) and less significant negative correlations (−0.23 to 0.27, p<0.05 threshold) in Va_09, Va_08, and Ob_07.

Weight reduction was highly significant; 5.6 kg (95% CI: 3.34 - 7.85) (p<0.001).

When the coercion condition was entered simultaneously with perceived motives, the relationship between condition and high-level behaviors diminished (β = -.30, p = .05); however, consistent with our motive-matching model, perceived motives remained a highly significant predictor of intentionality (β = .59, p < .001).

When comparing responder and non-responder values with respect to the sensory and the affective pain ratings, non-parametric tests disclosed a highly significant difference between groups in both pain dimensions ( p < .001).

The results showed a highly significant reduction (34%, P = 0.001) in UTI recurrences in the active treatment group compared with placebo.

The mean difference between results did not follow a normal distribution and we therefore tested the median difference using the non-parametric one-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank test (step 3), showing a highly significant (p < 0.001) difference of 824 kg CO 2 -eq.

The concentrations of VEGF, a factor which promotes angiogenesis, in the vitreous of patients in the study group were more than 17-times higher than in controls, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A highly significant difference in cAMP- and IP 3 baseline levels was detected at ZT 1, 9, 16, 18, 20, and 23 (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001).

7D ), a highly significant difference (p<0.001 at both stage 11 and 12).

We show that the number of Cycles had a highly significant effect on overall likelihood of ‘success’ (p < 0.001) if tested for all Genes and Concentration together.

Crucially, however, when adding the dummy variable (with D = 1 if the observation was a response to a non-symbolic stimulus, and D = 0 if it was a response to a symbolic stimulus) the weight of the dummy x logarithmic interaction was highly significant ( B D x log = 0.029, st. error = 0.006, t ratio = 4.727, df = 22, p < 0.001), confirming that significant differences in logarithmic compression do exist between fast responses to non-symbolic and symbolic stimuli.

From this analysis, a total of 128 genes including coding and non-coding (lncRNAs) were identified with highly significant change (p < 0.001, Bonferroni correction) (Additional file 1 : Table S1).

The highly significant ( p <0.001) differences between the caries-active and caries-free subjects were also larger than the respective data for plaque samples.

Our data showed that higher WS (>5.5 knots, except for days with air temperature between 1.5 °C and 12.5 °C) increased the risk ratio of EABP by 1.08-fold; a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.219, p < 0.001) was observed between EAC and WS on warm days (T ≥ 12.5 °C).

Consistent with this was the highly significant correlation between surface coverage and final leaf area (i.e. plant size) in both varieties where water was limiting ( Fig. 5B ; P <0.001), but not under well-watered conditions ( Fig. 5A ).

The ANOVA over all the movement groups together was highly significant (F = 261.1; p < 0.001).

This represents a 49% enrichment of differentially expressed genes in the NRRs, which is highly significant (Pearson χ 2 = 52.61, P < 0.001).

In each case, the relationship was highly significant for crown age ( r = 0.43–0.47, P < 0.001) but nonsignificant or weakly significant ( r = 0.02–0.09, P = 0.01–0.82) using stem age (see Materials and Methods).