“highly significant”

In this best model, the smooth term of the interaction between week of year and latitude was a highly significant predictor ( p < 0.001).

ChatGPT-4o achieved a mean OQS of 21.67 (SD 0.58) versus 21.00 (SD 0.71) for Gemini Pro, a difference that was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

After the completion of treatment with follow up result obtained in 08 patients of Group A ( Dhatri Avaleha ) i.e highly significant (p<0.001) in fatigue, significant (p<0.01) in abdominal pain and pallor, while insignificant (p>0.10) in joint pain, depression spleenomegaly, and irritable bowel syndrome.

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in bacterial abundance and diversity across year of collection, season, location, and host species.

Following PSM, the intergroup difference remained highly significant (2.50 cm vs. 5.82 cm, p < 0.001).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001), encompassing WBC count, CRP, PCT, and APACHE II scores.

In terms of ductility, the 0.3 Vol% GO sample demonstrated the highest elongation at break (56.97 ± 2.0%), a highly significant increase of over 55% compared to the control ( p < 0.001).

The receipt of 3 doses of the BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccine was associated with a highly significant 96% reduction in COVID-19 infection (aHR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.27, p = 0.001), a 91% reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 (aHR 0.01-0.71, p = 0.02), a 100% reduction in moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 (aHR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.04, p < 0.001), and a 100% reduction in severe or critical COVID-19 (aHR 0.0, 95% CI 0.00-0.02, p < 0.001) compared to participants who received 2 doses ( Table 4 ).

Factors Influencing Foraging Behavior Table 3 shows that food presentation type had a highly significant effect on foraging behavior ( p < 0.001) in this study, and weather was also significant ( p < 0.042).

The difference (11%) between tests 1 and 3 was highly significant (P < 0.001).

The difference between groups was highly significant (Friedman test, χ 3 2 = 48 . 1 , p < 0.001).

Age contributed significantly to FA variance in both clusters, as expected given that it is well known to correlate with FA ( Sullivan & Pfefferbaum, 2006 ), but the contribution of diagnosis remained highly significant as an explanatory factor of FA variance after controlling for age (for the ‘SZ < Control’ cluster: F = 26.99, df = 2, p < 0.001; for the ‘BD < Control’ cluster: F = 28.51, df = 2, p < 0.001).

The value P < 0.05 was considered significant, while P < 0.01, highly significant and P < 0.001, very highly significant.

The healthy-like EF probability for the WM training group increased substantially from 14.6 % at baseline to 40.2 % at follow-up ( p < 0.001), with a highly significant group × time interaction ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S10, Figure S8).

Across all years, the Kruskal-Wallis test yielded highly significant results (p < 0.001), indicating significant differences in dengue incidence among the three categories.

Impact of immunisation on cytological abnormalities Complete immunisation with three doses was associated with a highly significant ( P <0.001) reduction in all grades of cytological abnormality ( Table 2 ).

All of the correlations were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001), especially for those among the lengths of limb bones.

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in number of cases across months, with a p-value of < 0.001.

Proliferation following stimulation with either LPS or Con A was reduced to a highly significant extent (p < 0.001) in mice treated with either 1 mg/week or 5 mg/week of anti-IL-6 antibody compared to control.

The predictor was estimated at 0.0874 (standard error 0.0053) and was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The administration of ONA was associated with highly significant increases in CSP end latency (CSPe), from 118.5 ± 9.1 ms to 130.7 ± 6.2 ms ( p < 0.001), CSP duration (CSPd), from 39.6 ± 5.9 ms to 50.9 ± 7.3 ms ( p < 0.001).

Interestingly, Matsuo and colleagues had found that Jax mice emitted 16–25% more DSI contacts than NIH mice, a difference that became highly significant ( P <0.001) if the group sizes exceeded 10.

When the mean BMD scores of osteoporosis (0.26 ± 0.03) and osteopenia (0.38 ± 0.04) were compared, the difference was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistically.

The inter-subject test revealed highly significant differences for focal search (F(1,18) = 14.82, p<0.001) and direct swimming (F(1,18) = 23.31, p<0.001) as well as significant differences for scanning (F(1,18) = 5.78, p<0.05) and perseverance (F(1,18) = 9.87, p<0.05).

In contrast, the same test indicated at least a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) of coagulant on parameters of MO, COD, BOD 5 , TSS, PO 4 − 3 et NO 3 − (Table 3 ).