Although the magnitude of the decrease in lifespan between clk-1 and clk-1;sod-5 worms is small, the difference is highly significant (p < 0.001 for mean lifespan, maximum lifespan and Log-rank test comparing survival curves).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The absolute decrease in adverse effects was highly significant with 3.2% and 4.9% (both P < 0.001) for the 1-year and 3-year endpoints, respectively, corresponding to 33.2% (95% CI, 26.6 to 41.9) and 25.0% (95% CI, 20.4 to 31.4) of relative reduction.
Results: All third molars demonstrated a highly significant correlation with dental age ( P < 0.001).
In the program testing, universal genetic codes, the HKY85 evolution model and 31 quantitative biochemical properties were used to estimate adaptive selection (referred to as positive destabilizing selection, when the frequency of changes in magnitude categories 6, 7 and 8 were highly significant, z-scores > 3.09 and P < 0.001).
Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).
We found a highly significant increase in PI3K pathway signaling from CAH to EEC grade 1 (p<0.001).
The mid-domain effect’s estimate was highly significant (p < 0.001) and positive ( Table 1 ).
Spearman rank correlation was also highly significant between Cx43 and CD21 expression (rho = 0.981, P < 0.001), supporting the colocalization of these proteins.
We also found a positive, highly significant correlation between sucrose intake and Psd95 expression (r=0.587, P <.001), whereas no correlations were found for Syn1 (r=0.252, P <.05) or Gfap (r=0.312, P <.05) mRNA levels ( supplementary Figure S1c, d, e ).
Results showed that both linear and robust regressions were highly significant (linear regression: beta = 0.60, p = 0.001, effect size = 0.94; robust regression: beta = 0.20, p = 0.004) thus indicating that the internal connectivity of the identified regions significantly correlated with discounting behavior.
This is illustrated in our study where the proportion of EM T cells within the CD8 + population in the total group of MS patients (32.5%) was the same as in the healthy control group (33.3%) despite the presence of a highly significant reduction in the frequency of CD8 + EM T cells in the PBMCs in the MS group ( p = 0.001; Table 3 ).
In terms of TGRWT, the main focus of this study, there was a highly significant negative correlation in Ob_09 (−0.36, p<0.0010) and less significant negative correlations (−0.23 to 0.27, p<0.05 threshold) in Va_09, Va_08, and Ob_07.
Weight reduction was highly significant; 5.6 kg (95% CI: 3.34 - 7.85) (p<0.001).
When the coercion condition was entered simultaneously with perceived motives, the relationship between condition and high-level behaviors diminished (β = -.30, p = .05); however, consistent with our motive-matching model, perceived motives remained a highly significant predictor of intentionality (β = .59, p < .001).
When comparing responder and non-responder values with respect to the sensory and the affective pain ratings, non-parametric tests disclosed a highly significant difference between groups in both pain dimensions ( p < .001).
The results showed a highly significant reduction (34%, P = 0.001) in UTI recurrences in the active treatment group compared with placebo.
The mean difference between results did not follow a normal distribution and we therefore tested the median difference using the non-parametric one-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank test (step 3), showing a highly significant (p < 0.001) difference of 824 kg CO 2 -eq.
The concentrations of VEGF, a factor which promotes angiogenesis, in the vitreous of patients in the study group were more than 17-times higher than in controls, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
A highly significant difference in cAMP- and IP 3 baseline levels was detected at ZT 1, 9, 16, 18, 20, and 23 (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001).
7D ), a highly significant difference (p<0.001 at both stage 11 and 12).
We show that the number of Cycles had a highly significant effect on overall likelihood of ‘success’ (p < 0.001) if tested for all Genes and Concentration together.
For the 2x2 ANCOVA model addressing differential effects during the two stimulation blocks, the baseline covariate was highly significant, F (1,25) = 100.95, p <.001, η p 2 = 0.80.
The increase became highly significant for both proprioceptive and postural controls ( p < 0.001).
Statistical significance was interpreted as highly significant at P ≤ 0.001.
Results: The comparative analysis showed highly significant difference of knowledge and attitude score between general dental practitioners and non-orthodontic specialties (Student’s t -test, P < 0.001).