“highly significant”

Notably, as predicted by the microarray data ( Table I ), the qRT-PCR data ascertained that the inverse relationship between N- myc expression and miR-17 levels was highly significant (R 2 =0.98; P<0.001) ( Fig. 1A ).

There was a highly significant relationship between cross‐sectional values between the two methods ( r = 0.98, P < 0.001).

Using dichotomous (breast-fed or not) outcomes, we found highly significant associations between how they had been fed and future intentions for Scottish (χ 2 (1) =52.3, p < .001); Nordic (χ 2 (1) = 24.6, p < .001); and USA (χ 2 (1) = 19.4, p < .001) participants.

One-way ANOVA indicated highly significant treatment effects on growth based on both optical density and dry cell weight ( p < 0.001).

Differences among the three groups were highly significant for age ( p < 0.001) and moderate for distress intensity ( p = 0.003).

A highly significant relationship between AgeAccelGrim and sex ( T 4,94 = −5.200, p < 0.001) was also expected, given that sex is included in GrimAge calculation (Lu et al., 2019 ).

The variability in PLA 2 activity was most comprehensively described by a model including TAR, AMDTR, and Annual Precipitation (APN), accounting for up to 22.64% of the variance (R2 = 0.2264) with a highly significant p-value (p<0.001).

On the syndrome level, by contrast, our quantitative analysis revealed highly significant similarities ( p < 0.001) between the syndrome profiles of index cases of the “Schizophrenia Cluster” ( n = 136) and the syndrome profiles of their affected first-degree relatives ( n = 116) (Fig. 1 ).

When the distribution of the three psychological distress categories (anxiety, depression, and somatization) was compared between catastrophizers and non-catastrophizers, the difference was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001; Table 1 ).

The dimensions exhibited statistically highly significant sexual dimorphism ( P ≤0.001).

The VO 2max (ml/kg/min) of males and females was 55.41±9.45 and 39.91±3.14, respectively, the gender difference being highly significant ( p <0.001).

The difference calculated came out to be highly significant p <0.001 ( Table II - III ).

For both the parameters, differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The association between the prevalence of LVD and the initial diagnosis/differential diagnosis was highly significant ( p <<0.001) whereas none of the other associations attained statistical significance ( Table 6 ).

2009 ; http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/databases-core_collections_wr.php )—showed that the difference among the groups was highly significant for both the traits ( P < 0.001; Fig. 2b ).

Suppression of TNFα or IL-1β was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The effect of time was highly significant ( p < 0.001), but, the difference between the versions was not.

Repeatability testing demonstrated highly significant inter ( k + 0.86, p < 0.001) and intra ( k = 0.74, p < 0.001) observer (intra-class) correlation coefficients ( k ).

The addition of the FHS gave a highly significant improvement to risk models containing binary family history ( P < 0.001), the number of relatives with breast cancer ( P = 0.001), the type of relative with breast cancer ( P < 0.001), and the age of relative at breast cancer diagnosis ( P = 0.01).

As summarized in Table 5 , the proposed method shows highly significant improvements on FECGSYN across all metrics ( P < .001).

All sequential improvements are highly significant (p < 0.001, McNemar’s test), confirming that gains from class balancing, eGFR regression, and monotonicity enforcement are not due to chance.

However, in a multivariate regression analysis with gestational age and antenatal steroids as the independent variables and change in LVMI as the dependent variable within the preterm group, gestational age remained highly significant ( P =0.001), whereas exposure to antenatal steroids was not significant ( P =0.67).

This difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that patients with CKD were exposed to greater nitrosative stress (Table 4 ).

Statistical significance: P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), P < 0.001 (extremely significant).

Genetic structure For all populations, the pairwise F ST values were highly significant ( P < 0.001), varying from 0.042 to 0.500 (Table S3).