“highly significant”

One-way ANOVA confirmed highly significant differences in step counts among the groups ( p < 0.001), verifying distinct exercise intensities between HE (25,492.28 ± 8501.75 steps), ME (12,608.34 ± 1407.78 steps), and LE (5334.77 ± 2277.87 steps).

A repeated-measures ANOVA ( Table 2 ) revealed a highly significant effect of scanner type on scanning time (Greenhouse–Geisser corrected: F(1.49, 43.25) = 2851, p < 0.001).

At the global level, population ageing showed a strong and highly significant association with reported COVID-19 case rates (Pearson r = 0.734; Spearman ρ = 0.848; n = 187; p < 0.001).

Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed pronounced survival differences, with CON4 and CON1 showing highly significant log-rank tests ( p < 0.001 for both), where high-activity groups had substantially shorter median survival (32.4 vs. 65.5 months for CON4; 30.5 vs. 56.6 months for CON1) ( Figure 4 E,F).

One-way ANOVA confirmed that age had a highly significant effect on all measured parameters: flight speed ( F = 22.37, df = 3, p < 0.001), total flight duration ( F = 37.94, df = 3, p < 0.001), and total flight distance ( F = 247.82, df = 3, p < 0.001).

The rate of death or an adverse cardiovascular event was 13.2% lower, in absolute terms, for patients treated with high‐consistency testing (49.0%), a difference that was highly significant across testing consistency categories (log rank, P <0.001).

The mean PW was smaller in females than in males at all levels, and this difference was very highly significant at all levels ( P < 0.001).

The Welch test showed a highly significant effect of maternal educational level on maternal age, Welch’s F (2, 295.333) = 90.317, p < 0.001.

Meanwhile, the linear regression model was highly significant (F [1, 48] = 45.829; p < 0.001), indicating that EI is a robust predictor of performance in this cohort.

A substantial majority of women whose partners exhibited controlling behaviour reported emotional violence (71.84%), compared to 28.16% among those whose partners did not, a difference that was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Specifically, the correlations between head pollen load (NPH), thorax pollen load (NPT), abdomen pollen load (NPA), and leg pollen load (NPL) were all highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a pronounced synergistic effect in pollen-carrying capacity across different body regions of the insects.

HPES groups) two-way ANOVA on CPCN after priming revealed that the main effect for Priming was not significant ( F < 1), whereas the main effect for Explanatory Style was highly significant, F (1,110) = 15.19, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.121.

The validity of the HIT has been supported in relation to numerous constructs, including the ability to distinguish delinquent from non-delinquent populations, and highly significant ( p < .001) positive correlations with measures of externalizing behavior ( r = .52), aggressive behavior ( r = .38), antisocial behavior ( r = .55), delinquent behavior ( r = .41), and low empathy ( r = .42) (Gini and Pozzoli 2013 ).

Importantly, in both analyses, “hours since sunset” showed a highly significant negative association with activity (all data: Estimate=–0.072, z=–222.2, P < 0.001; active intervals only: Estimate=–0.026, z=–76.8, P <0.001), indicating that activity declined over the course of the night.

Mean hematocrit declined from 33.25% antepartum to 27.76% postpartum, a decrease of 5.49 percentage points that was also highly significant ( p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.10).

Correlation of UCE Capture with Specimen Age and DNA Quality We found that all investigated variables (pre-library DNA concentration, post-library DNA concentration, raw read count, UCE locus count, UCE mean contig length and UCE reads on target) decreased with increasing specimen age, and this negative correlation was highly significant in all cases (R = -0.36–0.75 and p < 0.001; Table 2 , Fig 2A–2E ).

In contrast, stage B HF patients exhibited a highly significant increase in MMP3 staining score compared to controls ( p < 0.001).

Microbial Counts in Lamb Burgers with Lupine Flour Treated by High Hydrostatic Pressure The results of the two-way ANOVA assessing the effects of treatment, formulation, and their interaction on the different microorganisms at day 1 ( Table 3 ) showed that HHP treatment exerted a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on mesophilic, psychrophilic, molds and yeasts, total coliforms, and E. coli , while S. aureus was significantly affected at p ≤ 0.01.

However, a PERMANOVA confirmed that highly significant differences exist between group centroids ( df = 9, pseudo- F = 26.2, p < 0.001), and subsequent pair-wise post hoc comparisons showed that indeed all centroids differ significantly from one another (see Table 1 ).

As shown in Figure 8 , a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed between the blank control group and the model group.

Between the groups as well as staining solutions, a highly significant difference was found (P < 0.001).

ANOVA and Tukey HSD analyses indicated that the PA dosage exerted a highly significant effect on the chemically bound water content at all tested curing ages (3 d, 7 d, and 28 d, p < 0.001).

Tissue-specific expression differences were highly significant (one-way ANOVA: F (6,14) = 194.65, p < 0.001; Figure 2 B). 3.3.

However, a highly significant difference was observed in PCOA measurements between groups (p < 0.001).

Frequency dependence of resistance(fdr = R5-R20), which is the most specific indicator of peripheral resistance [ 33 , 34 ], increased significantly in MA subgroup (+72.1 %), whereas it decreased significantly in HS-subgroup (−50 %), and the difference among the changes was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Fig. 1a ).