“highly significant”

The majority of pairwise Φ PT values were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for the seven ( K = 7) clusters derived from nested analysis (Table 5 ).

The absence of any patients over 40 in the non-CIA group, coupled with a highly significant p -value of <0.001, indicates a clear age-related trend.

Offspring size responded nonlinearly to temperature, as indicated by a highly significant effect of temperature squared in the linear model ( F 1,547 = 46.84, p < .001).

Results There was a highly significant increase in serum migration inhibitory factor and migration inhibitory factor mRNA levels in vitiligo cases when compared to controls (p<0.001).

For amblyopic eyes in monocular viewing, the additional effect of amblyopic eye VA (0.14 D decrease in accommodative response per line of acuity loss, P < 0.001) was highly significant, as was the interaction between VA and accommodative stimulus (0.09 D of additional lag per diopter of stimulus, per line of acuity loss, P < 0.001), indicating that the increasing error with increasing demand was greater in the amblyopic eyes with poorer acuity (as shown in Fig. 2 ).

The confidence interval 17.50–19.70 Mb of qSNC6 on chromosome 6 contains 100 SNPs within 25 genes and two candidate genes ( Os06g30390 and Os06g30440 ) were highly significant with −log 10 ( P ) >3.

The difference is highly significant ( P <0.001).

When comparison analysis was conducted, highly significant difference between two years ( p -value < 0.001) was identified.

For the second truss, bif was less branched when exposed to lower temperatures up to and including the third transfer (means of the first three transfers: cold=2.96 ± 0.22; control=4.07 ± 0.21), and the effect was inverted by the fourth and fifth transfers (cold=4.14 ± 0.55; control=2.01 ± 0.23), resulting in a highly significant treatment×transfer point interaction ( P <0.001; Table 2 ).

The difference is highly significant in favor of ESM (Mann‐Whitney U = 1959.5, P < .001).

In addition, a distinction was made between different significance levels: in the Results Section (see Section 3 ), a p -value of p ≥ 0.05 corresponded to “non-significant” (n.s.), p < 0.05 to “significant” (*), p < 0.01 to “highly significant” (**) and p < 0.001 to “very highly significant” (***).

Of all the pairwise correlations, 31% were highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

This improvement was found to be highly significant (t(24) = −9.798, p < 0.001).

This separation was highly significant for root metabolites (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) and significant for leaf metabolites (PERMANOVA, p = 0.012), but not significant for metabolite ratios.

The difference between these two ranges is illustrated in the cumulative frequency histogram of Figure 5A and is highly significant ( p < 0.001, paired t -test).

Interestingly, the ERCC2‐TP53 interaction was highly significant also in SNPsyn analyses (FDR <.001 and p < .001), thus indicating a consistent association across methods of this SNP‐SNP combination with longevity.

The results for all four flotillin siRNAs used showed a statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference to the controls.

Seven microRNAs (miR-16, miR-19a, miR-27a, miR-29b, miR-101, miR-130a, and miR-191) had a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) with INR, bilirubin and MELD score.

This was found to be highly significant P < 0.001.

Change in pain from baseline was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 1 week p.o., 1 month p.o., 2 months p.o., and at 3 months p.o.

The number of stakes ha −1 was the only individual practice that had a highly significant positive effect on yield in all three districts ( P < 0.001).

Facilitated allergen‐binding assays revealed a highly significant ( P < .001) dose‐dependent reduction in IgE allergen binding across all treatment groups (70 μg: 17.1%; 170 μg: 18.8%; 370 μg: 26.4%).

For an alluvial groundwater aquifer system, we compared EM SYBR Gold staining (instead of Acridin orange) with FCM SYBR Green and found FCM values being on average 26% lower than the values obtained by EM, with a highly significant correlation between both methods ( r = 0.91, n = 138, p < 0.001; unpublished data).

This difference is large in magnitude and highly significant statistically (χ 2 test, P < 0.001).

ETR predictions based on the MPB LUE index showed a highly significant linear relationship with measured PAM-fluorometry ETR (R 2 = 0.92, p<0.001; Fig 7 ) with a slope of 0.93 not significantly different from 1 (p>0.05).