“highly significant”

The correlation between the presence of the cTnT dp2 band and ADD is highly significant (Spearman’s ρ = 0.552, p ≤ 0.001).

Genome-wide differentially DNA methylation genes profiling in PCOS Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis showed 6936 differentially methylated CpG sites (p<0.005) respectively between control and PCOS-obesity group and 2664 CpG sites exhibited highly significant (P<0.001, Supplementary Dataset 1A ).

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating patterned relationships between the variables, making PCA a suitable analysis [ 37 ].

The difference between the baseline and 12 months postoperative values was also highly significant with P <0.001 ( Table 2 ).

ERNIE Bot consistently underperformed, with highly significant differences ( P <.001) compared with other models.

A well-known cardioprotective agent was used as a positive control (bradykinin 100 nM), resulting in a highly significant IS reduction (16.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.001).

11 ) showed that 3D CT was more reliable than frontal cephalometry for 11 points, Or (R), Or (L), ANS, UM (L), LM (L), Me (p < 0.001, very highly significant), MO (L), NC (L), Ag (L) (p < 0.01, highly significant), UM (R) and Ag (R) (p < 0.05, significant).

In (4) the effect of self-obese on 6 cat_requests is negative and highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

The comparisons between the scores at the different VAS and the LLS score revealed highly significant correlations (p < .001) for six out of seven items (Table 2 ).

The difference in mean number of recommended services between the two age cohorts was highly significant ( p < .001).

This was highly significant and, of all parameters assessed, the presence of TTR amyloid had the highest hazard ratio for death (HR 9.4 [2.4-35.6], p = 0.001, univariable Cox regression analysis).

All F ST were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

When the average (instead of the best) values are considered, the relationships between the power generated by thrust force (Pt) and the power needed to overcome drag force (Pd A : active and Pd P : passive) are still highly significant: Pd P = 38.69 + 0.618 Pt, R 2 = 0.942, N = 10, p < 0.001; Pd A = 58.04 + 0.926 Pt, R 2 = 0.942, N = 10, p < 0.001.

Also, a closer scrutiny of the Cochrane review revealed that despite a highly significant ( p <0.001) moderate pooled odds ratio (OR = 1.45) in favour of pre-contact, heterogeneity of study populations, reported odds ratios, and types of questionnaires in the studies included in the meta analysis was substantial.

Results The results of the internal consistency analysis demonstrated good relationships between the items; Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the four subscales were highly significant (p<0.001) (0.88-0.91).

A highly significant increase (p < 0.001) of angiotensin I (Ang I) was observed in ACE2 KO mice, which was accompanied by elevated concentrations of its downstream metabolites including Ang II (p = 0.027) and Ang-(1-7) (p = 0.023) ( Fig. 1a ).

Exposed workers showed neither clinical signs of immunosuppression nor alterations in total leukocyte or leukocyte subpopulations, while significant differences (p<0.05) were demonstrated for IL-12p70 and highly significant differences (p<0.001) for IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-8 levels.

The PUL scale showed highly significant loss of function at 12 months (p<0.001), with a mean drop in score of 9.2 (95% CI -11.9; -6.4) out of 74; this numerical result was predominantly driven by the loss of function in the shoulder domain.

At T 2 , a highly significant drop was observed ( p < 0.001), with a mean value of 10963 Hz.

3 of the 4 GO terms that showed highly significant enrichment ( p <0.001) were associated with ion homeostasis ( Supplementary Table 1 ).

A strong and highly significant association was also found with a history of TB in the past one to two years (χ2 = 183, p < 0.001), indicating recent TB history as a critical risk factor.

The difference between the case group and control group 2 was highly significant ( P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the case group and control group 1 ( P = 0.24).

The strongest structuring factor for β-diversity was the individual provenance of the samples ( R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001; PERMANOVA), while the altered microbial composition in kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy individuals was also highly significant ( R 2 = 0.06, p < 0.001; Fig. 2 a).

In the mandible, implants placed with regular IT (<50 Ncm) showed a mean MBL of 1.03 ± 0.12 mm, compared to 1.53 ± 0.29 mm for those with high IT (>50 Ncm), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) over a 3-year follow-up [ 41 ].

The risk-aggravating influence of bicycle stands and universities was highly significant at all distances (at p < 0.001), and their IRR values accrued generally with increasing distance.