“highly significant”

Highly significant effects of time (p<0.001) were detected for each trill feature ( Fig 8 ) except for trill entropy where a significant effect only was observed (p<0.05) and for the trill mean interval duration that did not change with time (p = 0.1903).

Three of the individual experimental design elements in the MV-EDAT – Uses Systematic Variation, Addresses Hypothesis, and Includes Replication – likewise, after Bonferroni correction (α = 0.008), showed highly significant improvement between pre- and postassessments for students in all treatments ( Figure 5 ; p < 0.001 for each using randomization tests).

GLM on Log-transformed data showed that week of sampling was highly significant (F 21;209 = 6.0; p < 0.001 ***) as well as the intra-treatment variability (F 3;209 = 4.5; p = 0.004 **), confirming that varroa mite infestation was irregularly but equally distributed among exposure and control sites, depending on the season (“date” factor) and on the single-hive history (“hive” factor).

Results: After performed HFDS combined with cataract surgery, the IOP was reduced from 27.7 ± 2.11 mmHg to 14.4 ± 2.59 mmHg, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Our study highlighted that there was a highly significant association between good knowledge and good attitude ( P < 0.001), and also, it was seen that participants with good practice also had good attitude which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference between pre and post-test was highly significant at t (7) = -5. 68, p <.001.

45.67 ± 8.79, 47.41 ± 10.15 and 50.86 ± 9.32 respectively) with highly significant different results ( p < 0.001).

We did in fact note a highly significant inverse correlation ( Fig. 6D , Rho = −0.29, P <0.001).

When instead considering saccades only (Figure 5A ), a picture consistent with the analysis above (section “Real-Life”) emerged: the standard deviation of saccade peak velocities yielded highly significant differences between the groups [vertical: F (2, 28) = 8.53, p = 0.001; horizontal: F (2, 28) = 12.42, p < 0.001].

For all cases, significance level was established at α = 0.05, and defining 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 as statistically significant (*), 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 as whole level significance (***). 3.

The analysis yielded highly significant positive associations for the following variables (listing according to strength of association): previous ablation therapy ( p -value < 0.001; OR 3.87), previous family history of CAD ( p -value 0.011, OR 2.57), previous electric cardioversion ( p -value < 0.001, OR 2.54), substitution therapy with magnesium ( p -value < 0.001, OR 2.32), administration of beta-blockers ( p -value < 0.001, OR 1.91).

Analysis of variance The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant differentiation (P< 0.001) among the three sources of variation: genotype (G), environment (E), and the genotype-environment (G x E) interaction, across all agronomic traits ( Table 1 ).

A highly significant correlation was observed with TPC (R 2 = 0.9312 ***, p < 0.001) and moderate correlation with TFC (R 2 = 0.8158 **, p < 0.01) ( Table 4 ). 2.4.3.

As expected, they predicted gains more on 3‐cue trials than 2‐cue trials ( p < .001), which was in turn more than 1‐cue trials ( p < .001), as revealed by a highly significant main effect of winning probability, F (2, 74) = 143.44, p < .001, ηp 2 = 0.80.

According to the Student’s two-sample t -test, there was a highly significant difference in p miss between the two first deciles of wrist activity ( p < 0.001, 672 degrees of freedom).

We detected highly significant interaction effects among the three factors ( p < 0.001), a result indicating that the plant cultivar also contributed to the overall patterns in anthracnose disease levels ( Table 1 ).

Red asterisks indicate highly significant (p<0.001) difference from the non-spreading elements within the distance classification.

There was a highly significant heterozygote deficit ( P -value<0.001) that was reasonably explained by null alleles (all P -values>0.24).

A highly significant decrease in overall house infestation with T. infestans as determined by timed-manual searches was observed between 0 and 1 YPS (CMH χ 2 = 70.5, df = 1, P < 0.001, OR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.28–0.46), with heterogeneous effects across strata ( χ 2 = 11.7, df = 2, P = 0.004) (Fig. 3 , Table 2 ).

The results revealed that even after controlling for global cognitive functioning, working memory, processing speed and negative mood, the link between lack of initiative and PM remains highly significant (r = −0.58, p < 0.001, 99% CI −0.78 to −0.28), as does the link between lack of interest and PM (r = −0.37, p < 0.01, 99% CI −0.64 to −0.01).

Irrespective of the sepsis definition, PSP was the only marker to demonstrate a highly significant interaction between time and group (sepsis versus no sepsis) ( p < 0.001) with a 3.3–5.5-fold increase within 72 h before the event of sepsis, whereas CRP, PCT, and WBC showed only mild undulations.

Moreover, z ve-ptp morphants presented a three-fold decrease in the percentage of EC-EC borders showing well-organized junctional complexes, which is highly significant (p<0.001), with respect to controls ( Figure 5 D ; Figure S5 ).

The work of adhesion, reflecting the area under the adhesion curve, was highly significant when compared to NCF and PSA ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 D). 3.4.

All comparisons with artificially balanced Test-2 remained highly significant ( P <.001), reflecting its intentional difference in class ratio.

Median confidence increased from not at all confident to somewhat confident, a highly significant improvement (Wilcoxon z = 5.11, p < 0.001, r = 0.84).