“highly significant”

Differences were considered statistically significant with p < 0.05 (*), highly significant with p < 0.01 (**) and extremely significant with p < 0.001 (***). 2.8.

Experiment (1) revealed no negative impact by HEDP on available chlorine (1), while all three experiments showed a highly significant ( p > 0.001) synergistic effect, which was not hampered by HEDP, between NaOCl and ultrasonic activation regarding tissue weight loss (1, 3) and dissolution of gelatin (2).

There was a highly significant interaction between Task and Region for both sets of ROIs, P < 0.001.

Analysis of variance showed that malting barley grown after non-malting barley crops gave very highly significant ( p < 0.001) grain and biomass yield increments than when malting barley was the preceding crop in these experimental sites (Tables 1 and 2 ).

Furthermore, the miR-26a mimic-transfected follicles showed highly significant upregulation of the expression of mmu-mir-26a as compared to the miR- non-targeted control group ( p < 0.001).

Results Exploratory Factor Analysis The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.91 for the complete data, and Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( P <.001).

The correlation is highly significant ( p -value = 0.001), Table S1: The individual PET scanning characteristics are listed for all 18 enrolled patients in the study.

The model demonstrated a highly significant association of both past (B = -1.286; P = <0.0001) and current non-vegetarian food habit (B = -0.667; P = 0.001) in the advancement of AMD pathology ( Table 6 ).

Brain size and tool use We find a highly significant correlation between body mass and brain size in Corvus (P < 0.001 Figure 3 ) both for the combined dataset and when analyzing the individual datasets from Mlikovsky [ 47 ] and Iwanuik & Nelson [ 48 ].

As for KRAS , such a heterogeneous distribution of PIK3CA mutations was found highly significant [p<0.001 (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.36-2.55); p normalized scientific notation = 5.9 x 10 -4 ].

Results At the end of treatment (EOT), there was a highly significant increase in platelet count ( p < 0.001), a significant increase in white blood cells (WBCs) count ( p ≤ 0.032), and a highly significant decrease in hemoglobin level ( p < 0.001) as compared to pretreatment levels.

Hence, the features of 9–20 except feature-12 and feature-19 show the highly significant different ( p -value < 0.001) in the SISA dataset.

According to the analysis of variance (Table 2 ), both models developed for shoot and root dry weight were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

For our a priori primary endpoint, the RI, the LMM analysis revealed a highly significant modality effect ( p < 0.001).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences in herbivory rates among sites ( F 4,95 = 13.4; p < 0.001).

Chi-squared tests showed a highly significant association between prior pill use (COCP and POP, pill undefined) and interest in postnatal POP prescription ( x 2 (1, N = 227) = 16.797, p < 0.001 (2-sided)).

However, although these correlations were all highly significant ( p < 0.001 for each MMR subscale) they were nevertheless weak.

Blood t‐tau and p‐tau181 demonstrated differences between tube types, including highly significant changes between serum and LiHep (Figure 2G–H , both P < .001).

In particular, the differences between the negative control and the positive control, intravenous PGE2, and intraligamentous PGE2 groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while the difference between the negative control and the submucosal PGE2 groups was less pronounced ( p < 0.05).

The RS-25 showed a highly significant positive correlation with the traits’ extraversion (r = 0.674, p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (r = 0.66, p < 0.001) in the NEO-personality scale, as well as a highly significant negative correlation with neuroticism (r = -0.62, p < 0.001).

Pain assessment in patients showed highly significant change from baseline VAS score to 4 th week of the therapy in gabapentin groups ( P <0.001) as compared to placebo.

When the whole group was divided according to a positive or negative Rigiscan a highly significant difference was found (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ) between age, degree of cavernosal fibrosis, and total and free testosterone levels.

In addition, CSM SN was positively correlated with All SN ( r = 0.45), and CSM SR with TSP SN (r = 0.41); both correlations reached a highly significant level ( p < 0.001, ***).

The difference in SV was modest (p = 0.0419), whereas the difference in CV was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Highly significant improvements (p<0.001) were found on each side when the second tests were compared with the original observations (Figures 4 and Figure 5 ).