“highly significant”

In the study by Rashead and Hamid, there was a significant difference between normal and abnormal values of creatinine, while there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between normal and abnormal values of TSH, T3, and T4 [ 46 ].

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant condition effect ( p < 0.001) on net CO 2 fixation rates of both genotypes separating control vs.

The contribution of the 3 variables used is highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all models.

A sharp increase in blood lactate levels after an acute exhaustive exercise (mean value 12.0 to 12.2 mmol/L) is associated with a significant worsening of immediate (defined as the explicit trial; p < 0.001 ****) as well as delayed (defined as the implicit trial; p < 0.001 ****, i.e., highly significant) reproduction of sequential visuomotor task paradigm, without gender differences.

Flesh foods showed a notable seasonal trend with greater consumption in the dry seasons when around 40% of women and children consumed flesh foods, highly significant for both ( P < .001).

Except for immediate bond strength ( p = 0.199), the conducted ANOVAs showed a highly significant impact of the test groups on SBS ( p < 0.001) for all further immersion intervals.

The interaction term between SES and a medium severity of COVID-19 has an insignificant coefficient of −0.28 ( p = 0.169), but the coefficient for the interaction term between SES and high severity, with a value of −0.96, is highly significant ( p = 0.001).

The highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) of flour type on sour flavor and aftertaste ( Table 3 ) was possibly because the flours contained differing levels of fermentable sugars.

Highly significant variations were found at ( p < 0.001) between genotypes.

Moreover, the subscale that considers the degree of “quantitative responsiveness” of the child results to be highly significant (V(28) = 19; p = 0.001; r 2 = 0.675; BF = 21.431) indicating a strong effect and strong evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis through the BF analysis.

Analysis of Variance and Mean Comparison for Physiological Parameters, Biomass, and Root System Architecture Traits An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of the genotype-water regime interaction for only stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi) ( Table 2 ).

The FA value recorded at 100 μg/mL of Aa E was highly significant (0.188 ± 0.006; p = 0.001–0.01) as compared with the FA value of the untreated control condition (0.149 ± 0.002), revealing a significant decrease in membrane fluidity (approximately 26.2% membrane rigidification).

The difference between the response induced by the two vaccines was highly significant on day 57 ( p < 0.001).

assessed changes in cognitive workload during the transition to adopting a commercial EHR, with the results suggesting that the difference in average scores of the cognitive workload (NASA-TLX) for participating pediatric nurses was highly significant ( p < 0.001) over time [ 54 ].

Association of TSR with Clinico-Pathological Features There is a highly significant correlation between TSR with luminal ER+ histological tumour type and grade (both p < 0.001), but not for TNBC.

The line × N rate interaction for NUE was not significant in the greenhouse ( p = 0.854) but was highly significant in the hoop house ( p < 0.001).

The estimated mean difference in depression scores between disabled and non-disabled students decreased slightly when adjusting for potentially confounding factors; however, the difference in depression scores between the two groups remained highly significant (Pakistan: EMD = 2.3, p-value<0.001; Afghanistan: EMD = 1.5, p-value = 0.003).

Such differences are statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) for UV group versus visible light irradiation group.

3 Results 3.1 Exercise-induced downregulation of IL-6 & TNF-α Serum levels of IL-6 decreased from 104.55 ± 2.93 (Pg/ml) before exercise to 55.57 ± 3.06 (Pg/ml) after exercise with highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

For curative test on day 5, hydromethanolic crude extract at 100 mg/kg/day, 200 mg/kg/day, and 400 mg/kg/day ranged from 25.58% to 48.76%, chloroform fraction at 100 mg/kg/day, 200 mg/kg/day, and 400 mg/kg/day and chloroquine base at 10 mg/kg showed 46.36%–74.42% and 92.87% percent parasitemia inhibition, respectively, and also the results to both tests were highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to the negative control.

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant reduction in blood loss in the TxA group with a p-value < 0.001.

Given the large sample size, these changes were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

To be considered a QTL in this dataset, we selected SNPs that were significant ( p < 0.05, marker-wise) in at least four of the tested environments for FHB resistance or two for plant height and flower time, and with at least one environment with a highly significant response ( p < 0.001).

Our study findings showed a highly significant three-fold reduction of BBB scores in the SCI group than in the sham group ( P < 0.001, Fig. 1 a), indicating a successfully established SCI animal model.

This would compensate for the dataset dependent variations and only highly significant observations were considered using a stringent cutoff value of p<0.001.