“highly significant”

The overall model was highly significant (Omnibus test of model coefficients, p < 0.001).

As depicted in Table 1 , rats treated with a single injection of MTX demonstrated a highly significant increase (p < 0.001) in the serum levels of AST, ALT, and ALP enzymes in comparison to control and crocin-treated groups.

Furthermore, we observed a large and highly significant main effect of “ instruction ” ( F (2,80) = 66.78, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.63). “ Instruction ” did not interact with “ sex ” ( F (2,80) = 1.65, p = 0.20, η p 2 = 0.04) or “ sex ” × “ task ” ( F (2,80) = 1.69, p = 0.19, η p 2 = 0.04), indicating that the difference in word generation between the two phonemic and semantic tasks and the different instruction conditions did not depend on sex.

However, while we did find a significant correlation between WASI II scores and age in Study 1 (r = .28, p = .035) our LoL data showed no correlation between expertise and age and a partial correlation of expertise with WASI II accounting for age was still highly significant ( p = .001, r = .45).

F5 cells exhibited decreased fold-upregulation of Wnt activity compared to HCT-116 cells, and the greater than two-fold difference in Wnt signaling upregulation between these lines was highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 C).

When serum levels of Vitamin C were compared between Group I (1.379 mg/dl) and Group II (1.1 mg/dl), the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

After taking the repeated nature of the data into account, the adjusted mean difference remained highly significant (mean difference 0.667, P <.001) but with a smaller effect size at 0.33 (see Table 3 ).

Furthermore, highly significant positive correlations were observed between the Cd content in pumpkin roots and stems ( p < 0.001), as well as between the Cd content in stems and leaves ( p < 0.001).

Higher levels of lactate, PCT, NEWS, and LP-NEWS scores are associated with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, all highly significant ( P < 0.001).

At 20 μg MSC-EVs, proliferation increased 1.5-fold (p < 0.05), and highly significant changes (p < 0.001) were observed at 40 to 100 μg compared to the untreated control (Fig. 3A ).

Mean cross-sectional area There is a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in meanCSA in all protrusion steps and all parts of the pharynx of 20.0 mm 2 (± 9.8) per millimeter.

Of these six (35.3%) found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase [ 27 , 28 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 40 ].

Moreover, they found a highly significant negative correlation between p16 immunopositivity and CDKN2A promoter methylation (P < 0.001).

The median SWE values were significantly greater in BI-RADS 4B lesions (45 kPa; IQR: 39–50) than in BI-RADS 4A lesions (38 kPa; IQR: 29.5–39.5), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test).

nucleatum -positive samples in group 4 (HGD) and 5 (CAC) was highly significant ( p = 0.001 and 0.000, respectively).

These significant transcripts included 54 gene isoforms showing a highly significant Bonferroni-corrected p-value (p < 0.001).

As evident by Spearman correlation analysis, a highly significant positive correlation between KLK9/KLK15 (r s = 0.716, p < 0.001) as well as between KLK10/KLK11 mRNA expression levels (r s = 0.647, p < 0.001), but not between other combinations, was observed.

Spearman correlation showed for each hemisphere a strong positive and highly significant correlation (OFF levodopa: mean Fisher-transformed r-value 1.15 ± 0.0325, P < 0.001 for all hemispheres; ON levodopa: mean Fisher-transformed r-value 1.06 ± 0.0340, P < 0.001 for all hemispheres).

With 1500 to 3000 SNPs, the increase reached 17.6% and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Isotretinoin exhibited a highly significant association (p<0.001), with the PIH only group having the highest proportion (69.5%, N=66) of individuals currently using isotretinoin compared to other groups.

For w AlbB, only the main effect of population was highly significant (F (14, 493) = 37.5341, P < 0.001) whereas the overall effect of sex (F (1, 493) = 3.0350, P = 0.082) was not significant and there was only a marginally significant interaction (F (13, 493) = 2.0186, P = 0.018).

The reduction was highly significant at ANOVA test ( p -value < 0.001).

The Kruskal–Wallis test showed highly significant differences between groups ( p < 0.001), which were identified in pairwise multiple group comparisons between low-grade (group 1), intermediate-grade (group 2), and high-grade (groups 3 and 4) lesions (Fig. 3b ).

The post-CPB PAP difference was highly significant between the two groups ( P = 0.001).

The experimental group in our study showed a highly significant decrease of perceived stress score at the end of 2 nd (p < 0.001) and 3 rd visit (p < 0.001).