“highly significant”

The difference between the two hemispheres was highly significant (p<0.001, the paired t-test).

ANOVA on the size of angles separating each data point from the horizontal showed highly significant (p < 0.001) variation among the three technologies ( Table 2 ). rhAmp and KASP showed smaller angle compared to that of TaqMan, indicating better allelic discrimination between homozygous (Allele 11) and heterozygous (Allele 12) ( Table 3 ).

The z statistic was highly significant ( p < 0.001) at the 0.05 critical alpha level in all the cases (Table 2 ).

Of course, the main effect Morph Step was highly significant ( F (6,468) = 121.23, p < 0.001).

There is a highly significant correlation between publication productivity related to leishmaniasis at global level and the Arab world (r = 0.936; p -value< 0.001).

Hence, a highly significant association was observed between cytological abnormality and HPV infection ( P = 0.001).

405–1.710, P < 0.001), while the additional studies showed highly significant results (Hedges g = 1.619, 95% CI = 1.295–1.942, P < 0.001, Figure 4 ).

bursa-pastoris and parental species was positive and highly significant for all three tissues ( p < 0.001), and the slope was intermediate between what would be expected if there were either only cis -( β = 1) or only trans -regulatory ( β = 0) changes ( β = 0.37, 0.42 and 0.46, respectively for flowers, leaves and roots).

The temporal AMOVA based on microsatellites revealed absence of genetic structure among the five temporal groups ( F CT = 0.10, P = 0.19), but a highly significant genetic structure within temporal groups ( F SC = 0.23, P < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

In addition, Bartlett's test of Sphericity was highly significant χ 2 (210) = 9628.310 ( p < 0.001) ( 27 ).

The effect of life cycle stage is highly significant based on a randomization of samples with respect to life cycle stages in RDA (pseudo-F = 17.6, p = 0.001).

When compared to the increase in trials with a single complex spike, this second protraction was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon-matched pairs test after Benjamini-Hochberg correction; S2D Fig ).

Student's pairwise t -test revealed that the differences in the average distances of the three pairs ( Figure 5d ) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In the univariate analysis age, T stage, N stage, grade and combined MMR-BRAF status were all highly significant (all p <0.001).

Incubations with any concentration of LD fucoidan tested resulted in a highly significant protection of cell viability (all p < 0.001) (1 μg/mL 83.25 ± 3.60%; 10 μg/mL 101.75 ± 4.71%; 50 μg/mL 100.88 ± 5.51%; 100 μg/mL 92.75 ± 7.03%) ( Figure 2 b).

Differences were significant if p < 0.05, highly significant when p < 0.001 or p < 0.0001 and a trend was considered if 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

There was also a highly significant effect of the breed on important production and reproduction traits ( p < 0.001).

Statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlation between functional and histological staging suggests that individuals with clinically advanced OSMF had extensive fibrosis histologically, which can be used as a reliable criterion in determining the diagnosis, prognosis, and severity of the disease.

The magnitudes of effects for these respondents who believe that an HIV-positive teacher should continue teaching attenuated by 10% and further 5% with the introduction of demographic and socioeconomic measures respectively, turning the previously highly significant estimate (OR=1.46, p≤0.001) into significant (OR=1.31, p≤0.05) and marginally significant (OR=1.24, p≤0.10) when comparing the coefficients in Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 2 to Model 3.

When CGI total change score was the dependent variable and group (hom or NT), age, gender, and ADHD severity the covariates, the model explained a significant amount of the variance in CGI change score due to the highly significant influence of ADHD severity ( t = 4.225, p < .001).

Such fluorescence peak in early recovery phase is highly significant ( P < 10 −3 ; 1.7-fold increase as compared to fluorescence at treatment time) and specific to persister cells, as shown by the absence of a significant increase at the population level and in the sensitive cells ( Fig. 3, A and B ).

The family Mavoka x Garukunsubire had the highest average of DMC (35.9%), with highly significant (p < 0.001) positive SCA, while the family Mavoka x Ndamirabana recorded the lowest average of DMC (28.4%), with significant (p < 0.001) negative SCA (-3.62).

There was highly significant reduction ( P = 0.001) in burning sensation with successive visits in all the three groups.

The non‐linearity of Breslow thickness was highly significant ( P < 0·001) and well represented by logarithmic transformation.

A distinct pattern of change was observed, with (highly significant: p < .001) improvements for the Pyramid group (on the three subscales), with large effect sizes for emotional symptoms ( d = 0.79) and peer relationship problems ( d = 0.82); comparison pupils showed minimal change.