“highly significant”

The control group C (no treatment) displayed an average plant length of 35.17 ± 8.51, and the difference in the shoot length was highly significant, as revealed by the one-way ANOVA ( p < 0.001).

The PSCES of the five evaluators had highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001, r = 0.68 to 0.76) with the SDS.

When all nine cement samples are pooled, the linear regression is highly significant, yielding R 2 = 0.94 ( p < 0.001), with slope = −2.53 ± 0.57 and intercept = 2.76 (95% confidence intervals).

Kaplan-Meier curves for the four risk groups identified by the classification tree demonstrated a highly significant association with clinical deterioration ( p <0.001, Fig. 4 ), highlighting the efficacy of the tree in stratifying patients according to risk.

Fertilization treatments were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and T0 and TMIN had the higher value of biomass (on average, 2.46 kg m −2 ), T100 + 50 produced an average of 1.99 kg m −2 (−24.0% compared to T0).

Fit There was a highly significant difference in perception of fit among the facemasks ( p < 0.001), Table 3 .

Quantification of the staining intensity demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank test) increase in protein expression for Calnexin (1.6-fold) and AnxA2 (1.5-fold) and a 1.3-fold increase of AnxA5 (at the border of significance, p = 0.05) ( Fig. 6 ).

All pairwise comparisons of differences in dietary GHGEs between all quintiles were also highly significant ( P < 0·001), except for quintile four compared with quintile five for the women ( P = 0·061) (Table 5 ).

The multivariate analysis for associating expression values of the entire miR cluster with miR17-92 locus gain revealed a highly significant association ( P <0.001).

All comparisons demonstrated highly significant concordance ( p < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 (*) and P < 0.01 (**) and highly significant if P < 0.001 (***).

The overall breath-holding effect for both shimming methods was highly significant for all subjects (threshold t > 3.11, p < 0.001 uncorrected).

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in both factors (“group” and “time”) (p<0.001).

Although the water volume (X 2 ) shows no significant linear effect on the benzoate concentration ( p = 0.810), the highly significant quadratic term (X 2 2 ; F = 19.63, p = 0.001) implies the existence of an optimal level for this parameter within the experimental range.

CAC was a highly significant, independent predictor of events ( P < 0.001), with a doubling in CAC being associated with a 29% increase in risk of events. 9 CAC provided greater predictive value for cardiac events than Framingham Risk Score and UKPDS risk scores as well as to conventional and novel risk factors.

Furthermore, there was a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001) in the mortality of larvae pre-treated with L. reuteri ( Figure 7 ).

The remaining items presented highly significant p values (p≤0.001), as shown in table 1 .

In the correlation between variables in the saccade task, highly significant correlations were observed between the prosaccade RT and the antisaccade RT for all groups (all participants: r = 0.74, p < 0.001, VGP: r = 0.72, p < 0.001, NVGP: r = 0.73, p = 0.007).

In NAF condition, there was a highly significant negative association between k values and the mean of the absolute values of ΔF2 for each PWS and each place of articulation ( r = −0.636, p < 0.001 for Pearson product-moment uncorrected scores, based on 63 observations).

Except with regard to HPB.3.1 (hand-washing), where there was a weak negative effect that was only significant with regard to YouTube, WhatsApp and the aggregate social media variable, there was in every case a very highly significant negative relationship between use of each social media platform and each of the health-protective behaviours considered individually ( p < 0.001).

Expectedly, the vitamin C status improved significantly over placebo to 46 μmol/L in the intervention group (p<0.001) but surprisingly, the vitamin C status of the placebo group also showed a highly significant increase to 30.7 μmol/L from baseline (p<0.001), indicating that both groups were in the suboptimal range at this point [ 2 ] and clearly increased from study start.

The findings of a lesion size larger than 10 mm had a highly significant effect on the outcome ( p < 0.001), with an odds ratio (OR) of 9.72 (95% CI: 2.97 to 31.86), indicating that for an enhancing lesion, having a size larger than 10 mm increases the odds of malignancy by nearly ten times.

3.2 In vitro treatment of protoscolices The findings of this experiment showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) scolicidal effects against protoscolices of E. granulosus for all of the various concentrations of crude venom, compared to the negative control group, both within the same time and for different periods, as shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2 .

The group difference was still highly significant [ t (48) = 3.30, p = 0.001, 1-tailed].

Results Gene expression of NTN4, inflammatory cytokines, MMPs, and CXCL1 following rotator cuff injury Compared with intact tendons (day 0), Ntn4 expression showed no significant change at day 7 (P = 0.257) but rose markedly thereafter, with highly significant increases at days 14 and 28 (both P < 0.001) and remained elevated at day 56 (P = 0.007) (Figure 1A ).