“highly significant”

After 10 weeks treatment with the trial drug, highly significant improvement was observed in the clinical features of IDA with P value < 0.001.

Sensitivity analysis revealed that this result was strongly influenced by GSE185263 : after excluding this study, the association became highly significant (SMD ≈ -0.90, P < 0.001) with reduced heterogeneity, whereas removal of other studies yielded non-significant P-values.

Any cardiovascular event was documented in 37.8% of subjects from the low-risk group, 44.4% in the moderate-risk group, and 73.5% in the high-risk group, with the trend being statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Univariate test results revealed a highly significant and substantial main effect of Group on recognition speed [ F (2, 82) = 22.59, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.355].

The differences among the observers in frequency of opportunities to witness HH performances were highly significant; P<0.001.

The difference is large and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Genetic differentiation, measured as θ , between reared strain/wild population pairs was rather low, ranging from ~0.01 in SWE and IRL to 0.039 in CAN but nevertheless, was highly significant ( P < 0.001 for all three pairwise comparisons).

Responses of net primary productivity and relative growth rate to different grazing intensities in a herbaceous marsh wetland Grazing intensity exerted a highly significant effect on aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) (F 2,42 = 27.21, P < 0.001) ( Figure 4A ).

As far as the HADS depression scale was concerned, a highly significant greater percentage of abnormal depression was observed in male (36.8%) relative to female (16.8%) subjects ( p < 0.001).

Results: In gutkha users, the frequency of MN was highly significant (17.4 ± 0.944) as compared with nonusers (control) groups (4.53 ± 0.331) ( P < 0.001).

Paired statistical tests confirmed that differences between CK and 150 NaCl were all highly significant (p < 0.001).

To further account for the distributional characteristics of the data, a generalized linear model (GLM) with a Gamma distribution and log link function was applied, which confirmed a highly significant treatment effect (Wald χ2 = 131.11, df = 3, p < 0.001).

The cataract development was delayed in erythromycin pretreated group compared to galactose control group and rifampicin pretreated group, and this was highly significant statistically with a P value = 0.001.

Time series causality IV prevalence was significantly associated with the evolution of EV/RV ( p < 0·001) and the effect of IV was highly significant at lag zero ( p < 0·001), indicating a non-lagged interference between IV and EV/RV as assessed by the Granger causality test.

Global spatial clustering of positive holdings was highly significant (nearest-neighbour ratio = 0.39, z = –8.26, p < 0.001), with elevated density along coastal agricultural corridors.

A highly significant association was observed between the HC and AD groups in terms of age ( P <.001) and educational level ( P <.001) and between the HC and MCI groups for age ( P =.24).

Neither genetic group nor the interaction of genetic group and pea genotype were significant, whereas pea genotype showed to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A paired t -test comparing the accuracy of the participants in the first training session and the last training session (11 th session) showed a highly significant difference ( t (14) = 4.32, p <0.001), Figure 4 .

Post-RT evaluations are demonstrated in ( Table 4 ), A highly significant improvement in the IPSS was observed, with a reduction in the median score from 11 to 5 ( p < 0.001).

By designating the distinct generic clades as foreground branches, we unequivocally identified a highly significant signal of positive selection ( p < 0.001) acting exclusively on the ycf1 gene within the Pinalia lineage.

The reduction involved both the ipsilateral and the contralateral eyes relative to the lesion, with highly significant differences (i.e., p < 0.001 in several studies) [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].

Highly significant correlations between both datasets (P < 0.001) (data not shown) highlighted the statistical robustness of the data.

The three remaining predictors were highly significant (p < 0.001 for each parameter) and had regression coefficients comparable to those in the main model (surgical complications: 1.574 vs. 1.694; immediate urine production: −2.049 vs. −2.408; rate of change in serum creatinine: 0.233 vs. 0.233).

To assess this relationship, we linearized the data by taking the absolute values of mean-subtracted GC content and found a highly significant but weak relationship with coverage depth (P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.047).

From the first session onward, significant differences began to emerge ( P = 0.016 for air blast; P = 0.038 for tactile), becoming highly significant in subsequent sessions ( P < 0.001).