“highly significant”

Regarding lipid profile, there was highly significant increase of CHOL, TG and LDL in group B compared to group A and control group (p-value < 0.001).

Results were considered significant at the p < 0.05 level and highly significant at the p < 0.001 level.

A meta-analysis of 48 Trier test studies on healthy participants showed a large mean cortisol effect size of 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70, 1.14) and this effect proved highly significant ( p <0.001).

When comparing consanguineous and nonconsanguineous marriages in parents of the cleft and control groups, the association between consanguineous marriage and the occurrence of clefts was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The females in vendor group G did show a highly significant increase in BUN ( p ≤ 0.001) and paired with the control range creatinine is often reflective of dehydration and is possible in this group with the highest concentration of MCLR.

A two-sided exact McNemar’s test demonstrated a highly significant difference between the results of the two methods ( P < 0.001).

Serum from mice immunized with both conjugates induced highly significant responses to cCPS ( p ≤ 0.001, one-way ANOVA) two weeks after the second vaccine dose, while the group of mice vaccinated with pCPS only, CRM197 and OVA proteins only, and the control group did not have an antibody immune response ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.

Subcutaneous delivery of KatA + EHV-1 gG resulted in a highly significant reduction in bacterial load observed when compared to unvaccinated mice (***p<0.001).

Of the 4 lncRNAs, the expression difference of lnc-C22orf32-1 was highly significant ( P = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test).

Additionally, this group showed a highly significant increase in CAIT scores ( p < 0.001), indicating enhanced functional stability.

The result of the second spatial sorting of the 70 components with the corresponding z map for the feature “language,” that is based on an automated meta-analysis of 553 studies on language by the NeuroSynth platform, as the spatial template yielded a correlation with the component 22 of r = 0.47, which is highly significant at p < 0.001 (corrected for multiple comparisons).

Results : We observed a highly significant and positive correlation between anti-SARS-CoV2-Spike-IgG formation and neutralizing capacity ( r = 0.908, p ≤ 0.001).

This inter-species difference was highly significant ( Fisher Exact Test, p<0.001 ).

In particular, Model 1 revealed that national pride, national citizenship, and world citizenship at the individual (within-country) level were each highly significant predictors of life satisfaction (national pride: B = 0.36, t (130,004) = 36.14, p < .001, 95% CI [0.34, 0.38]; national citizenship: B = 0.08, t (130,004) = 7.35, p < .001, 95% CI [0.06, 0.10]; world citizenship: B = 0.16, t (130,004) = 21.10, p < .001, 95% CI [0.14, 0.17]).

A highly significant correlation was found between BDAT raw scores and Gold-MSI self-report questionnaire scores on subscales Musical training and Perceptual Abilities ( r = .324, p < .001; r = .297, p < .001 respectively).

Its coefficient—in the detection probability submodel—was strongly negative and highly significant (Tables S3 : − 3.38 for the position on the ground, P < 0.001).

The differences in tumor volume between the control groups (groups 1 and 2) and the hVDAC1-siRNA2/A-treated mice at all-time points were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Our most striking result was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001–0.05) in peak approaching YAV between the subjects with aUVL and healthy controls (HCs) across circumvention protocols (see Figures 3 – 5 ).

This analysis resulted in a highly significant difference ( t (503) = 7.36, p < .001; Cohen’s U 3 = 0.37).

When the LPS concentration was 1 μg/mL for 24 h, NO production by the cells was highest, showing a highly significant difference in comparison with the blank control group ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant results are presented with p < 0.001.

Differences between groups of patients were highly significant ( P = .001 and P = .004, respectively); patients were also differentiated by ELN score ( P = .056) ( Figure 4A-C ).

Multivariate analysis of EFS showed a highly significant hazard reduction for an event for patients treated within the AMLSG 16-10 trial compared with the AMLSG historical control group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P < .001); this effect was significant both in the younger (HR, 0.59; P < .001) and the older patient cohort (HR, 0.41; P < .001) ( Table 3 ).

The accuracies of radiologists’ independent diagnoses were 58.4%, 59.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, all of which showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

In particular, the summed numbers of the spaces in three highly significant sectors were more significantly associated with logMAR ( ρ = −0.515; P < 0.001).