“highly significant”

The correlation between mutated TP53 status and liquid biopsy positivity became highly significant at the time of disease progression, when the TP53 results of liquid biopsies were also considered (69% vs. 19%, P<0.001, Table 1 ).

However, increase in extracellular Ca 2+ concentration to 1 μM showed a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction of Li + currents through nc DHPR (I max = −0.47 ± 0.10 pA/pF; n = 8) compared to wt (I max = −1.68 ± 0.25 pA/pF; n = 6) myotubes ( Figure 3b ).

3.5 SARS-CoV-2 antibody-temperature-responsive polymer enrichment efficacy evaluation SARS-CoV-2 antibody-temperature-responsive polymer supported with free polymer showed a highly significant enrichment capacity after applying thermal precipitation compared to the control one without applying thermal precipitation, p-value < 0.001 as shown in Fig. 5 where no. of enrichment folds was increased to reach around 71-fold after thermal induction. 3.6 Antigen enrichment using SARS-CoV-2 antibo

Additionally, the ATS revealed a highly significant main effect of time, F (3.00, ∞) = 7.77, p < 0.001.

The positive correlation remained highly significant (P<0.001) when adjusted for age, sex, marital status, education, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, waistline, SBP and DBP.

FND-CTSI showed a highly significant correlation with the length of hospital and intensive care unit stays (P < 0.001).

The estimated trend for indications was negative and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all cases.

17,599) The results of the T-test showed that this decline was highly significant. t (106) = 5.2858, P < 0.001 (Table 2 ).

Of these, seven made a highly significant contribution (p<0·001): age 12–17 years, substance use, psychotic disorder, intellectual disability, behavioural disorders, anxiety disorders, and being admitted in duty time (recorded as 1600 h to 0800 h).

Vote was highly significant and had a large effect on perceived trustworthiness, F (2, 203) = 113.045, p < 0.001, ηρ 2 = 0.527.

The difference in mass between the sexes was highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table S1 and Figure S2 , section a).

johorensis had outlying positive values for its difference in CON effect on growth P 2 –P 1 , for both the nonspatial and spatial models, but that was accounted for by the highly significant large effects in P 1 ( p ≤ .001) despite the corresponding effects in P 2 being very close to zero ( p > .05).

Concerning convergent validity, the factor loadings of all indicators for the latent constructs were greater than the 0.7 benchmark and highly significant ( p < 0.001) (see Tables in the Online Appendix).

The correlation between 226 Ra and 232 Th was not significant ( r = 0.47, p > 0.05), whereas a highly significant correlation was observed between 226 Ra and 40 K ( r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and between 232 Th and 40 K ( r = 0.75, p < 0.001).

Leaf Mineral Content There were highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) among the genotypes from different ecological regions for most of the mineral contents including Mg, P, Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn ( Table 1 ).

Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed that the changes in the tyrosinase activity were found to be highly significant at all three time periods studied (ANOVA; F = 9.07 p < 0.001 for 0 h, F = 10.86; p < 0.0005 for 24 h, and F = 19.59; p < 0.00001 for 36 h) ( Table 8 ).

The results of two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between the groups with normospermia and pathozoospermia, as well as between the three ethnic groups in terms of semen quality, including the total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology ( Figure 2 ).

As Table 3 , Table 4 show, specific traditional masculine norms that were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for predicting different generations' health service use included Emotional control , Work/school , Self-reliance , Status , and Violence .

In the regression model, attenuation of the adjacent lung parenchyma was highly significant (odds ratio 0.987, p < 0.001), with a large effect size.

The linear regression model was highly significant; F(3,399) = 638,22, p < 0.001, n = 400 and 82.9% of variance is explained by the FTE distalisation, anteriorisation and knee flexion, which corresponds to a strong effect (f 2 = 4.85).

There was a highly significant association between the VLO of the CT and SMA (Chi2 = 201, p < 0.001), usually respecting a “plus two” rule.

The model estimated was overall highly significant, F (10, 179) = 11.54, p < .001, with R 2 = .39.

In LUAD, there was also a highly significant difference between stage I clinical pancreatic cancer samples and stages II and III clinical pancreatic cancer samples ( P < 0.001), and stages I and IV clinical pancreatic cancer samples had a significant difference ( P < 0.05) ( Figure 5F and Supplementary Figure 4 ).

Regarding the association between intentions towards COVID 19 vaccination and attitudes towards vaccines, vaccine hesitancy had highly significant associations with intermediate mistrust level of vaccine benefit (p < .001), high worries about unforeseen effects (p < .001), intermediate concerns about commercial profiteering (p < .001), and intermediate preference of natural immunity (p < .001) ( Table 5 ).

Both KBP resulted in highly significant conformal plans as compared to CP, (Conformity Index CI 43 and CI 36 ; 1.07 ± 0.05 vs 1.01 ± 0.02, 1.58 ± 0.11 vs 1.45 ± 0.06, p < .001) ( Table 2 ).