“highly significant”

Regarding CSS, the survival differences were highly significant among all subgroups (P < 0.001), except for the difference between stage IIIB and IIIC diseases, which demonstrated a marginally less pronounced distinction (P = 0.021).

For reproducibility, the correlation between the sqFFQ/SI1 and sqFFQ/SI2 was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a good correlation coefficient of 0.689 and a Bland–Altman index of 3.7%.

The unconditioned models (null models) of the multilevel analyses showed that a highly significant proportion of variance was determined by the wave (mental well‐being 20%, somatisation 38%, anxiety 28%, depression 22% and PTSD symptoms 28%; Wald Z = 7.75, p < 0.001), with the proportion of variance due to the individual level also being significant (mental well‐being 80%; Wald Z = 8.83, p < 0.001; somatisation 62%, Wald Z = 5.71, p < 0.001; anxiety 72%, Wald Z = 6.35, p < 0.001; depression 78%, Wald Z = 6.72, p < 0.001; and PTSD symptoms 72%, Wald Z = 6.37, p < 0.001).

Caffeine intake of 200–≤400 mg/day was associated with 58% risk reduction (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.25–0.69], p<0.001), and that of 400 mg–≤600 mg/day was associated with a highly significant 80% reduction (OR = 0.20, 95%CI = [0.08–0.51], p<0.001), and >600 mg/day had also strong 79% reduction (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = [0.09–0.52], p<0.001) comparing to the lowest caffeine intake group with 0–≤200 mg/day.

The dataset’s suitability for PCA was confirmed by a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.51 (above the acceptable threshold of 0.5) and a highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity ( p < 0.001), validating its appropriateness for multivariate analysis.

Statistically, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed for all LWRs with the r 2 values ≥ 0.975.

Data demonstrated excellent suitability for factor analysis: KMO measure of sampling adequacy=0.91 (excellent), and Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 528 =5790.89; P <.001), confirming the appropriateness of the correlation matrix for factorization.

Differences were regarded as statistically significant and as statistically highly significant if p values were <0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively.

Short‐stem hips had a small but nonsignificant difference in femoral antetorsion angles pre‐ and post‐operatively (1.8° ± 3.2°, p = 0.109), while the difference for conventional‐stem hips was much larger and highly significant (10.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001).

Interestingly, the decline was highly significant in both 3⁄4 55 and > 55 years age groups (p<0.001 and 0.044 respectively), females (p=0.024), vaccinees without comorbidities (p=0.026) or higher BMI (p=0.024).

Site-specific survival correlation Among MGC-positive cases, anatomical site showed a highly significant correlation with survival (p = 0.001).

The differences in average performance between the three types of HPDs (passive earplug, active earplug and active earmuff) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whatever the comparisons (passive earplug vs. active earplug, passive earplug vs. active earmuff and active earplug vs. active earmuff).

The density of type C LCs [ Figure 6 ] was markedly increased in chronic gingivitis compared to that of normal gingiva and this finding was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].

In all the above tests, the P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant; P value >0.05 was taken to be statistically not significant; P value <0.01 was taken to be statistically highly significant and P value <0.001 as very highly significant.

OSCC with lymph node metastasis showed only slight lymphoplasmocytic infiltration in a highly significant manner ( P < 0.001).

Grain appearance quality The percentage of undamaged grains (UDG) was lower in FACE than in AMB by 5.4 percentage points (Table 2 , P = 0.083), averaged over all cultivars, but with highly significant cultivar differences ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference detected among groups for peak troponin levels (p<0.001).

The highest average desire score was observed in participants who identified as bisexual, while the lowest desire score was found in the asexual group, with the group differences highly significant ( F (4, 67,330) = 697.4, p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.04).

After accounting for the reduced availability of oxygen in saline water, the effect of salinity decreases (model estimates drop from 0.08 to 0.03; Table 1 ), but remains highly significant ( p < .001).

Finally, there was a highly significant difference in predation between the two sites ( site 1a and site 1b ) (gall predation: negative binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.05, SE = 0.44, z = −4.64, p<0.001; the incidence of gall predation: binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.25, SE = 0.31, z = −7.26, p<0.001; predation rate: quasibinomial GLMM, estimate = −2.13, SE = 0.26, df = 521, t = −8.30, p<0.001).

Nevertheless, the between-boar differences for this trait were highly significant (P<0.001).

The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association between the type of treatment and recurrence (p<0.001) (Table 5 ).

Detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy Based on fundus examinations, the overall detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy were 3.5% (dipper), 46.8% (non-dipper), and 50.0% (reverse-dipper), with a highly significant difference among groups (χ 2 =35.066, P < 0.001).

The main effect of TASK was highly significant ( F = 16.601, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.293).

Evaluation of antioxidant activity of trans-crocetin in vitro The scavenging ability of trans-crocetin for superoxide anion (•O 2 − ) was evaluated by the lumino-DMSO-NaOH luminescence system, and as shown in Table 5 , trans-crocetin had more vital scavenging abilities than the positive control ascorbic acid, with highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) compared with the control group.