“highly significant”

WN injections displayed no significant difference regarding the mean elasticity modulus (EM; 0.992 kPa) when compared to not injected controls (1.176 kPa; Figure 2 ), while WJ injections caused in one experiment a highly significant reduction of the cellular EM from 0.891 to 0.440 kPa ( p < 0.001, Figure 3 ) when compared to their corresponding controls.

In the overall study population with 123 patients, BFP amounted to 41.4% when determined with TANITA and 39.1% when assessed with the BIACORPUS device, a statistically highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

All the studied populations performed highly significant departure ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.05) from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium when considering all microsatellite loci.

According to the AMOVA results, there were highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in genetic differentiation among species and within species.

The results of the χ2 test indicated a highly significant association between nationality and year (χ2 = 459.825, df = 4, p < 0.001), suggesting a substantial variation in the distribution of nationalities across the study years, especially during the years impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The first Analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis revealed a highly significant effect of the osteogenic media for all osteogenic groups (2, 3, 4 and 7) versus the negative control group (group 1) with p ≤ 0.001, revealing a successful osteogenic differentiation.

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

The levels of significance after the post hoc screening were specified as followed: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001). 3.

The correlation study between the SSP and RBS total scores was highly significant (Rho = −0.80 ( p < 0.001)).

The results showed Giardia infection in all examined regions of Serbia, with an overall prevalence of 6.1 %, and highly significant (p = 0.001) differences among regions (3.2-14.2 %).

Subset analysis indicated that the increase of RNR treated by C-PEI was highly significant compared with the sham group (P<0.001), moderately significant compared with the 2 mL ethanol group (P=0.048), but not significant compared with the low PTX dose group (P=0.307).

The association between the exposure to both parasites was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Two discriminant functions were obtained: the first function presented a lower Wilks’ lambda (value = 0.262), and the test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The effect of history of recent hypercholesterolemia treatment was highly significant in the GLMs of both outcomes ( p < 0.001), and the achieved statistical power was β = 64.5 and β = 74.2 for LDL-C and TC, respectively.

The younger groups in this survey (aged 18–34 years) showed highly significant differences regarding the reasons to vaccinate or not vaccinate between the adherent and the hesitant ( p < 0.001).

After 60 d of ensiling, pH exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with LA content ( r = -0.89, p < 0.001) and a strong significant positive correlation with AN content ( r = 0.86, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, all products’ amylose content is highly significant at p < 0.001.

The intercept was highly significant ( F = 306.954, p < 0.001, Partial η 2 = 0.448), indicating a strong overall model fit.

The current study found the effects of frequency of use to be highly significant ( p < 0.001 for QoL, and p = 0.01 for depression).

As detailed in Table 2 , the Spearman Rank Correlation analyses between the HSCL-25 (psychological distress) at T2 and all continuous mental health instruments at T1 showed that all correlations were highly significant at p < 0.001, ranging from rho = 0.209 (OCD) to rho = 0.413 (SDQ Internalizing problems) and rho = 0.441 (SMFQ depressive symptoms).

The presence of a household toilet (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23–0.48), water storage facilities (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23–0.47), and the practice of treating drinking water (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20–0.45) were all protective against infection, each showing highly significant associations ( p < 0.001).

Within-group analyses revealed highly significant reductions in pain from baseline to Day 7 in all groups (Friedman’s test, all p < 0.001), with very large effect sizes.

The increased concentration of IL-12 in the AZD4820-treated cultures was highly significant (AZD4820 versus VACV GFP or mock infected; p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 A).

**, difference significant with p < 0.01 ***, difference highly significant with p < 0.001.

faecalis (17.2 ± 0.65), and the difference between the groups related to the antibacterial activity was highly significant ( P < 0.001).