“highly significant”

Convergent and discriminant validity yielded both highly significant results (r = .79, p < .001, resp. r = .38, p < .001).

Additionally, severe ADL dependency was observed in 75.9% of participants before the intervention, which dropped significantly to 9.3% afterward, also showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant association was found between the presence of diarrhea and C. parvum infection ( χ 2 = 55.89, p < 0.001).

We found a significant effect of age : w AlbB interaction ( F = 4.55, P = 0.037), a significant effect of population ( F = 3.58, P = 0.034) and a highly significant effect of w AlbB ( P <0.001), while all other interactions or main effects were non significant ( P >0.05).

The p for trend remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all models except Model 2 ( p = 0.11), which still showed elevated point estimates.

Urgency of operation (emergency) had a highly significant suppressive effect on PONV risk in the crude bivariate logistic regression model at the 5% level (odds ratio 0.176; CI, 0.072-0.43; P < 0.001) (Table 2 .).

On the other hand, the Pearson correlation-based comparison between the in vitro and the in vivo degradation volume ratio revealed a highly significant correlation, with an R 2 of 0.74 from 12 weeks' data ( P < 0.001), 0.89 from 24 weeks ( P < 0.001), and 0.75 from total ( P < 0.001).

The differences in mean weights between high-fat- and standard-fed mice were highly significant ( P < 0.001) from age 9 wk onward (6 wk on diets).

Once again, classification accuracy was highly significant (p < 0.001; chance accuracy 50.50–51.84%).

A highly significant higher level of sCD200 was found among cases as compared to controls (P<0.001), while a significantly lower level of CD200 R expression on both lymphocytes and monocytes was detectable in cases as compared to controls (P < 0.001 in both instances) Table 1 .

Pairwise χ 2 analysis among the three age groups all showed highly significant differences in infection rates ( P < 0.001).

Similar to the combination of testosterone + finasteride, the group with the combination of both drugs also showed a highly significant increase in AR in the stroma ( p < 0.001).

For both horizontal and vertical pairs, this effect was highly significant (α 1 : r 38 = 0.62, p < 0.001, BF = 1442.37; α 2 r 38 = 0.68, p < 0.001, BF = 13370; Figures 4 G and 4 H), while for diagonal pairs, it was weaker and marginally significant ( r 38 = 0.31, p = 0. 051 , BF = 1.241 , Figure 4 I).

The regression model was highly significant, F (11, 995) = 12.997, P < 0.001.

Moreover, the effect of the factor group was not significant, while those of the factors room, time point, and their interaction were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The association remained highly significant after adjustments for age and sex (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.72; P <0.001) and after serial additions of family history of SCD, NYHA functional class III to IV, and obstructive physiology in the model ( Table 4 ).

falciparum (9.51%) infection was found highly significant (χ 2 = 1456, P< 0.001).

The differences were highly significant when compared with the children and adults groups ( P < .001), and still significant compared with the elderly group ( P < .05).

Among positive cases, presence of purulent frothy yellowish greenish vaginal discharge is highly significant characteristic ( P <0.001) of vaginal trichomoniasis.

Socioeconomic Status : A highly significant association was found ( p < 0.001), confirming a strong relationship between this variable and the academic performance.

A highly significant difference was observed in the LST between vaccinated and control groups (P=0.001).

It was also noted that for HGB values, a positive correlation was highly significant (p < 0.001) at high parasite thresholds (> 2000 parasites/μL) but not significant at low parasite thresholds (p < 0.1), suggesting a regime in which parasitaemia levels correlate with a drop of HGB at high parasite loads but with the relationship disappearing once the number of parasite in blood lowers as effect of the anti-malarial medication (as it can be seen in Fig. 5 ).

Similarly, after excluding patients who died, the protective effect of antifungal treatment remained highly significant (OR < 0.001, 95% CI < 0.001–0.020, P < 0.001).

As shown in Table 1 , there are highly significant differences in terms of the number of cases with high IGFIR expression between the colorectal cancer and the normal group ( P < 0.001) or between the cancer and the adenoma group ( P < 0.001).

The hematologic recovery (following withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001), and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).