“highly significant”

However, when the post-treatment group was compared with the control group, a highly significant increase was noted ( p < 0.001).

Nevertheless, in this case, the effect was not significant ( p < 0,05) only in young worms (day 2) at 200 μM, while it is highly significant ( p < 0.001) at 300 μM and in adults in post-reproductive stage (day 9), with respect to controls reproductive stage (day 9), with respect to controls.

ANOVA outcomes inferred existence of a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) of DF and DM traits among the mapping individuals although significant environmental (years) effects observed on these two traits in both seasons/years.

The difference of 9.1% in the SVR rates between the ≥ 25% and < 25% overreporting levels was highly significant ( p <.001).

However, MK-801 in these same doses produced highly significant ( P < 0.001) reductions in the rate of tumor growth, to almost 60% that of controls, over the course of the study ( Figure 5b ).

The model likelihood ratio chi-square statistic of 604.969 was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The correlation between peak voltage and either Ca 2+ or h-conductance is highly significant ( p < 0.001), but there is no significant correlation between K + conductance and peak voltage ( p = 0.82).

AMOVA showed that both the within-collection and the between-collection variations were highly significant ( P <0.001).

In PD, the MNTD index showed a highly significant positive correlation with the MPD index ( p < 0.001), and both indices had no significant correlation with the PD index, the Shannon–Wiener index, and the Margalef index.

In well-watered conditions, highly significant differences were detected between the genotypes for photosynthesis (A), transpiration (E), and stomatal conductance (gs) ( p < 0.001).

This difference was found as highly significant ( P value < 0.001).

Results also revealed highly significant ( P < 0.001) relationships between leaf N:P ratios of the study species and soil indices such as Ca ( Fig. 5a3–c3 ) and soil pH ( Table 2 ).

The negative buffering effect of diversity on variability across the gradient was similar in microorganisms and macroorganisms (similar slopes, ANCOVA interaction: P = 0.71), and a single linear fit across both microorganisms and macroorganisms was highly significant (CV = 156–71.1 logS, R 2 = 0.58, P < 0.001; Supplementary Information: Fig.

Contrary to expectations, two-way ANOVA analysis of the skeletal phenotype at 6, 12, and 18 wk of age ( Figure 1b , Table 1 , Figure 1—figure supplement 1c , Supplementary file 1 ), revealed highly significant ( P <0.001) anabolic effects of Rspo3 haplo-insufficiency on structural, cellular, and dynamic parameters in both female and male mice.

Differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05 (*) or highly significant when p ≤ 0.001 (**).

A close and highly significant direct relationship (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ = 0.755, p < 0.001) was detected between the residuals of IBV and XRV ( Figure 3 b). 3.3.

At protein level, serum S100A12 protein concentration was highest in the SIMD group (19.60 ± 3.36 ng/ml), followed by the non-SIMD group (14.79 ± 2.92 ng/ml), and lowest in the control group (10.33 ± 1.97 ng/ml), with highly significant differences between groups (all p < 0.001) ( Figure 2B ).

In the Chi-square test, the OSCC tissue samples showed a highly significant upregulation of CD96 mRNA expression ( p < 0.001) and protein expression ( p = 0.005) compared to the healthy mucosa.

Season had a highly significant effect on all three parameters (p < 0.001).

Note however that this post-hoc analysis did not remove the strong difference in occipital/posterior cingulate ratio between the CAA and AD groups, which remained highly significant ( p <0.001).

The presence of CVD had a borderline significant influence on patient survival ( Table 3 ), and the positive association between the presence of CVD and DM was highly significant (odds ratio = 7.224, P <0.001).

The time of onset of sensory block was 6.57±1.794 minutes in group IB, 2.30±1.343 minutes in group HB, and 4.57±1.960 minutes in group IL, and this variation was statistically highly significant (P<0.001).

ANOVA of multi-environments showed that differences of genotype were highly significant ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S2 ).

At F21, the CIf/CIm difference was also highly significant for both high and unselected lines ( P <0.001) whereas it was reduced in the low discrimination lines ( P <0.05).

The increase in L levels in the first trimester were found to be highly significant for the development of GDM (P<0.001).