“highly significant”

Education: − The multinomial test indicates a highly significant association (χ 2 = 59.333, p < 0.001) between observed and expected education levels, implying that the education distribution significantly differs from expectations. − Table 3 reveals that the observed percentage of players with primary school education (3.3%) is much lower than the expected 25.0% (CI: 0.4% to 11.5%).

SIV ANOVA 2x2x2x6 showed highly significant results for the interaction between Groups, Gender and SIV (F = 2.25; df = 5/350; p < 0.001) and the interaction: Gender x Time x SIV (F = 2.77; df = 10/700; p < 0.01).

Independent sample t -test demonstrated highly significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001).

Differences were deemed not significant at p -values > 0.05, significant at p -values < 0.05 (marked as “*”), significant at p -values < 0.01 (marked as “**”), and highly significant at p -values < 0.001 (marked as “***”). 3.

In the first experiment, the results revealed a highly significant effect of treatments on survival rate (F(20,42) = 118.348, p < 0.001).

In all models, age, sex and meal location were highly significant predictors (all p < 0.001).

Results of both were statistically evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t-test and considered significant ( P < 0.05), highly significant ( P < 0.01), or extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

All the differences were statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test z = −4.376; −4.379; −4.234; −4.200; −4.375; respectively, all P < 0.001 highly significant).

ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) between genotypes for all grain‐related traits in each environment (Table S2 ).

In this study, literacy appeared as an associated factor for more than the recommended level of salt consumption, which was statistically highly significant (OR: 0.777, CI: 0.671–0.900, p = 0.001).

When looking at prestimulus alpha power, we found a highly significant main effect of pupil bin on alpha power ( Fig. 4 b ; F (1,998) = 108.27; p < 0.001).

The results of the Chi square showed that the Wald statistics are highly significant ( χ 2 ( 9 , 378 ) = 33.83 ; p < 0.001 ) , even though the pseudo r 2 = 0.0903.

Most importantly, skills in performing opera showed a significant increase from pre-intervention ( M = 65.3, SD = 8.2) to post-intervention ( M = 78.9, SD = 7.1), with a t-statistic yielding a statistically highly significant difference, t (198) = 14.27, p < 0.001, with a large effect size, d = 1.73.

We additionally verified that the observed correlation was highly significant by permuting gene labels in the ABC dataset ( p value < 0.001 over 1000 permutations).

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among the three groups’ mean scores for overall attitudes (ANOVA p = 0.001).

2 B various treatments applied in this research work had highly significant impact ( p < 0.001) on root length.

The results of the patient study indicated that age had a highly significant relation ( p < 0.001) and a moderate strength of association with knowledge of the QR code ( C = 0.230) ( Table 3 ).

The difference was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating the success of the HSRCLP intervention in enhancing research attitudes among average and low-performing students. 4 Discussion The current study's findings provide significant insights into the effectiveness of the High School Research Cognitive Learning Program (HSRCLP) in enhancing research attitudes among high school students.

Across both pairs of samples and three independent experiments, the reduction in mAb7a/3B11 ratio was highly significant (mean reduction 45.8%, p < 0.001, paired t test, n = 9 bands per condition).

There were highly significant differences between CLD patients and healthy control groups in terms of LFT, IGF-1 and 25- OH D ( p < 0.001 ).

Similar results were found for all three CRIES-13 subscales (see Table 2 ). Mothers’ trauma symptoms and ratings of children’s trauma symptoms In our sample, there was a highly significant positive association between the mother’s own PTSD-symptom load and their rating of the child’s PTSD symptoms ( β = .52, p < .001), even after controlling for the child’s age, gender, self-reported PTSD symptoms or living situation.

A highly significant difference of opinion exists between PHECC practitioners and EM consultants in relation to this issue ( p < 0.001).

Results There was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between groups regarding serum level of Dickpoff 1 with mean of 1 ng/mL in group A (cirrhotic), 2.38 ng/mL in group B (HCC), and 1.83 ng/mL in group D (AFP negative HCC) in comparison to control group C with mean of 0.54 ng/mL.

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) The Sample 1 ( n = 5373) satisfied the requirements for carrying out a factor analysis, since the KMO value (0.94) was greater than 0.70 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant (χ2 = 73,832.02, df = 276, and p < 0.001).

The content of four different metabolites in the Mod group was decreased compared with that in the Con group, with the difference being highly significant (P<0.001).