Most notably, the TTH demonstrated a highly significant divergence between groups ( p < 0.001), with the S group demonstrating the shortest median TTH of 94 s (IQR: 86–98) compared to 256 s (IQR: 245–295) in the C group and 120 s (IQR: 78–131) in the T group, as presented in Table 10 and Figure 6 . 4.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The main effect of group was highly significant ( b = −59.60, SE = 5.70, t = −10.46, p < .001), confirming substantial differences between Autism and Comparison groups.
Chi-square analyses confirmed that coffee consumption timing showed highly significant associations with bedtime patterns (χ 2 = 57.806, p < 0.001), sleep duration (χ 2 = 42.759, p < 0.001), and daytime sleep behaviours (χ 2 = 27.247, p < 0.001).
A highly significant increasing trend in age across in-hospital mRS categories was observed (Jonckheere–Terpstra p < 0.001).
Statistical analysis confirmed a strong association between viral detection and seasonality, with all viruses showing highly significant differences (p < 0.001).
albicans cells in the MBs@VRC+ UTMD group surpassed that observed in every comparator cohort, with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test (two-sided)).
Although it was associated with all three finger patterns, Type II lip print associated with loop fingerprint is highly significant (68%) ( P < 0.001) followed by arch fingerprint pattern and whorl fingerprint pattern.
For cataracts, we observed a highly significant association between increasing age and the frequency of cataracts ( P < 0.001) with female sex as a relevant risk factor [odds ratio for women versus men = 1.76 (1.28–2.41), P < 0.001].
The differences between the two periods were all highly significant (p<0.001).
In detail, a highly significant decrease of collagen IV- and Iba-staining was found at the ischemic border zone with respect to the ischemic core (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test), while the signals were further reduced in the contralateral striatum (p < 0.001 for both markers; Wilcoxon test).
Overall average score for the self-rated understanding of the sheep meat industry was 3.63/5 (1 = poor understanding, 5 = very knowledgeable) and the wool industry was 3.58, with a very strong and highly significant correlation between self-rated understanding of both production systems ( r (929) = 0.82, p < 0.001).
Postoperative complications occurred in 45.1% of PF patients (97/215) compared with 22.4% of non-frail patients (41/183), a highly significant difference (P<0.001, Figure 1A ).
The results show that EMGMDA achieves statistically significant improvements over all baselines: on HMDD v2.0, the Holm-adjusted p -values are < 0.01 for both AUC and AUPRC across all comparisons; on HMDD v3.2, EMGMDA is highly significant against all baselines on AUC (Holm-adjusted p -values < 0.001) and remains significant on AUPRC (Holm-adjusted p-values < 0.01, with comparisons against MDFormer and DARSFormer reaching Holm-adjusted p -values < 0.001).
However, these differences were only highly significant for I 1 ( F = 0.32; p < 0.001), but marginal for LDMC ( F = 1.62; p = 0.058).
Genotoxicity was, for example, much less impressive than that of the positive controls EMS (approximately 30% tail DNA at 0.75 mM), or 4NQO where concentrations of 0.075 up to 0.25 μg/mL showed highly significant increases of DNA damage ( P < 0.001, results not shown).
After collapsing DSM into two categories, required (DSM 1, 2) and not required (DSM 3, 4, 5, 6), we still see a highly significant increase in IF for journals with required data sharing (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, p < 0.001, 2013 and 2014 data) ( Fig. 2 ).
There was a decreasing trend of percentage Emiratis with PA, which was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Age distribution showed that patients aged ≤ 40 were more frequently observed in the BBM group compared to those aged > 40, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).
The log-likelihood ratio test comparing this two-piecewise model to a single-slope linear model was highly significant ( P < 0.001), confirming that the two-piecewise model provided a substantially better fit to the data than a one-piece linear model.
Water Absorption Test and the Effect of Treatments The analysis of variance showed a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) effect of the applied treatments on seed weight after water absorption.
The significance indicated refers to the solvent-treated control (1% MeOH) calculated with an unequal variances t -test; *** statistically highly significant ( p ≤0.001), Figure S8: HPLC-HRMS extracted ion chromatograms of m/z [M + H] + 376.2118 (calculated for hydroxy- or keto-trichosetin, Δppm = 5) for the wild type (WT) and OE:: TF22 T9.
We found a highly significant ( P < 0.001) overall effect of RIPreC (SMD of 11.06; 95% CI 8.52–13.60), as well as a similar level of heterogeneity ( I 2 = 91.1%).
Notably, the NC8Δ-pWCF-P49, NC8Δ-pWCF-K205R, and mixed newly engineered LAB groups (mixed vaccine group) induced a highly significant increase in the proportion of CD11c + CD80 + cells in PPs ( P < 0.001, Fig. 3D ).
The correlations of reproductive traits of winter wheat in different environments were compared in the figure, from which it can be seen that most of the winter wheat reproductive traits reached the highly significant level (p<0.001).The correlations of S1 stage traits in E1 environment were -0.02-0.67, and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E1 environment were 0.22-0.55; and the correlations of S1 stage traits in E2 environment were 0.37-0.55; and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E3 and E4 environments were 0.37-0.55. correlation was 0.37-0.63 for S1 stage trait in E2 environment and 0.45-0.62 for S2 stage trait in E2 environment; correlation of S1 stage trait in E3 environment was 0.41-0.62 and correlation of S2 stage trait in E4 environment was 0.36-0.62.
Radiographic fusion was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictor of the improvement of VAS and NDI scores.