“highly significant”

The differences between the two groups were highly significant for all comparisons ( P < 0.001), except for the comparison of the PCT concentrations in bacterial and viral infections with a likely diagnosis based on objective findings.

The sex difference between females and males showing the secondary sex signs was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Regarding Tnf mRNA levels, a highly significant interaction between LPS treatment and sex was observed [ F (1, 8) = 31.260, P < 0.001], and the main effect of LPS was found to be statistically significant [ F (1, 8 ) = 120.863, P < 0.001], as was the main effect of sex [ F (1, 8) = 41.985, P < 0.001].

As shown in Table 5 , the results of testing the hypotheses regarding the correlations among factors influencing learning resilience are as follows: academic self-efficacy and perceived campus belonging exhibit highly significant correlations with learning resilience at the P < 0.001 level; learning climate shows less significant correlation with learning resilience at the P < 0.05 level; Social relationships and learning resilience exhibit a significant correlation at the P < 0.01 level; however, the relationship between learning environment and learning resilience is less significant at the P < 0.05 level.

Correlation of the magnitude of differential expression of the differentiation signature genes derived in vitro ( n = 1763) with corresponding changes in a subset of the LG and HG cell lines grown as xenografts revealed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.92, P < 0.001, Fig. 8A ) confirming differentiation-related transcriptional differences observed in vitro are largely retained when the cell lines are grown in vivo.

For heel off, the log-transformed elastic modulus again emerged as a highly significant positive predictor (β = 12.253, p < 0.001), while thickness maintained a negative effect (β = –9.819, p = 0.005).

The influence on survival of an ALC < 1.2 × 10 9 /l in this group was highly significant (mean OS 36 vs. 56 months, p = 0.001; Fig. 1b ).

armeniaca subspecies, differences in central tendencies (i.e., centroids) of shell form were highly significant (Table 1 ), with U. a. andreyi and U. a. clarksoni the most dissimilar ( D = 4.66, R 2 = 0.64, P = 0.001) and U. a. armeniaca and U. a. diprotodon the most similar ( D = 1.61, R 2 = 0.47, P = 0.001).

Notably, the correlation between the discount rate and the GRCS total remained highly significant after controlling for stage of treatment (partial coefficient r =0.612, p =0.001).

Among all participants who reported experiencing aggression, the majority attributed it to clients (78.7%, n = 328), with a smaller share involving colleagues and supervisors (21.3%, n = 89), a difference that was highly significant (χ 2 = 77.9, p < 0.001; Table 3 ).

The difference was perceived as statistically non-significant (ns), significant (*) at p < 0.05, highly significant (**) at p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) at p < 0.001 and (****) p < 0.0001. 3.

The difference between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) tests supports the results of the cluster analysis and differences between clusters are highly significant ( p < 0.001).

One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically highly significant difference between HBSS, placentrex, propolis 10%, and pomegranate juice 5% (p = 0.001) (Table 3 ).

The global effect of both species and exposure (sun/shade) on the physiological variables of field samples was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed between environments and environment by line interactions (Table S8 ).

Specifically, the use of DIBH resulted in a highly significant decrease in the mean and maximum doses of the heart, the LAD artery, and the ipsilateral lung exposure ( P < 0.001), for both normal fractionation (NF) and hypofractionation (HF) treatment plans.

In all regions, there were highly significant differences between the actual and expected stand age distributions (average ages of dominant trees with no fire exclusion) ( P <0.001, Fig. 2A–F ), indicating that fire was the predominant disturbance prior to effective fire exclusion.

There was a highly significant association (P<0.001) between sex and place of tobacco use.

The test for subgroup differences was highly significant (chi 2 = 10.62, p = 0.001; I 2 = 90.6 % ).

There was a highly significant positive effect of the congruent contextual cue on memory performance [F(1,77) = 100.9, P<0.001, η 2 = 0.57], but no effect of time of day [F(1,77) = 2.0, P = 0.17, η 2 = 0.03], nor an interaction between these factors [F(1,77) = 0.4, P = 0.53, η 2 = 0.01].

A co-transfection of miR-155-5p together with this positive control in HEK-293T cells resulted in a highly significant reduction of the relative light units (RLU) to 55.7% ( p < 0.001) (Figure S1A).

The difference in CN shows as highly significant ( p < 0.001) and would therefore be a better choice for studies trying to identify small regional sodium concentration changes, as changes in total tissue sodium concentration are linked to SNR differences.

Highly significant correlations (Pearson and Spearman’s, p < 0.001; Fig. 1 D) were observed between SF4 values calculated from confluence measurements and cellular viability assays, validating the reproducibility of these high-throughput methods.

A Two-Way ANOVA on body weight over the 10 weeks of VAD revealed a highly significant effect of deficiency [ F (1, 35) = 32.69, p < 0.001] and a strong interaction deficiency × weeks [ F (9,315) = 52, p < 0.001].