“highly significant”

Species had a highly significant effect on epicotyl length (p < 0.001; Table 1 ), with S. barbata producing substantially longer epicotyls (M = 33.77 mm) than A. cyclophyllon (M = 0.56 mm).

In terms of DISCERN scores, a highly significant difference was detected among the groups ( p < 0.001), and post-hoc Dunn testing indicated that Google Gemini 2.5 Flash differed significantly from ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-5, Deepseek-V3 and Grok 3.

3.2 Response surface experimental results The results of the response surface optimization showed that the regression model for Moringa seed oil extraction yield was highly significant (P < 0.001), with a non-significant lack-of-fit (P > 0.05), indicating good model validity.

The relationship was highly significant (R 2 = 0.85, p < 0.001), indicating that this reference region scales predictably with body size.

The smooth term for mean temperature had an estimated effective degrees of freedom (edf) of 2.99 and was highly significant (χ 2 = 39.74, p < 0.001).

Proline content showed a highly significant positive correlation with TSS ( r = 0.992, p < 0.001), supporting their coordinated role in osmotic adjustment.

The two-way ANOVA results reveal the significant main effects of period (F(1, 3551) = 582.15, p < .001) and group (F(2, 3551) = 140.14, p < .001) as well as the highly significant interaction between them (F(2, 3551) = 899.69, p < .001).

Furthermore, BPI scores at 3 months postoperatively were significantly lower than those at 1 month postoperatively, indicating a highly significant reduction ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).

A highly significant effect of Change was observed, F (1, 68) = 15.31, p <.001, η 2 p =.18, indicating faster responses when color was repeated (M = 863.92, SD = 79.72) compared with when changed (M = 877.85, SD = 79.617), and neither significant effects of Preceding Distractor Value, F (2,136) = 2.16, p =.119, η 2 p =.03, nor a significant interaction, F (2,136) =.54, p =.581, η 2 p <.01.

The difference between the groups was highly significant (P < 0.001; Figure 1C ).

However, there was a highly significant main effect of processing condition [ F (2, 22) = 46.07, p < .001].

A Pearson’s chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between site and infection status (χ2 = 67.33, df = 3, p < 0.001), indicating strong spatial heterogeneity in parasite transmission risk across the region ( Figure 2 ).

Compared with the solvent control + juglone (12.07 ± 4.1%), the CH 50 μg/ml, CH 100 μg/ml and CH 200 μg/ml groups presented highly significant survival rates of 73.98 ± 2.8%, 83.87 ± 4.3% and 72.15 ± 2.8%, respectively (*** p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 a).

Analysis and interpretation of results of both groups pre- and post-treatment Both groups demonstrated a highly significant improvement in pain measured by VAS scores and PPT ( p < 0.001).

Statistically significant disparities in IGDS9-SF scores were evident across several variables: Gender : A highly significant difference was observed ( p < 0.001), with males exhibiting a higher mean IGDS9-SF score than females.

The results showed a highly significant difference in the level of trait mindfulness between the two groups ( t (28) = 11.75, p <.001, Cohen’s d = 4.29).

Conversely, sadness demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), with more than half of the cases (56.8%) reporting sadness compared to only 11.9% among controls.

Analysis of variance indicated that irrigation interval was the most influential factor, exhibiting a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) on most assessed traits.

In all treated groups (except group 9 [OCSiAl Tuball, low dose]) the number of animals with granulomatous inflammation/ granuloma in one or more of the protocol organs was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) compared to the negative control group.

Statistically, features such as rosette count, degree of differentiation, cellular atypia, and mitotic activity showed highly significant associations with histological subtype (all p < 0.001), with Cramér’s V indicating strong effect sizes.

This effect exhibited concentration dependence: within the range of 0.25–1 mg/mL, cell viability showed an increasing trend, with highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.001) compared to the control.

The association between the transsaccadic working memory in LOCUS and ROCF copy performance remained highly significant (rho = –0.46, p<0.001), even after accounting for age, education, and general memory performance (ACE-III Memory subscore).

Treatment‐time interaction highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Figure 6 ). 3.3.4 Pain VAS scores decreased from 7.5 ± 1.2 to 2.5 ± 1.2 (Δ‐5.0) in HBO versus 7.3 ± 1.3 to 5.8 ± 1.4 (Δ‐1.5) in control, with significant treatment‐time interaction ( p < 0.001) (Figure 7 ). 3.3.5 Quality of Life Wound‐QoL scores improved from 58.3 ± 12.1 to 35.6 ± 10.3 at day 30 in HBO versus 57.8 ± 11.9 to 45.7 ± 11.5 in control ( p < 0.001).

However, the ADE of SHR on IMH remained highly significant (ADE: 0.0157, 95% CI: 0.0099-0.0198, P < 0.001).

When compared with 37 healthy controls, this difference remained highly significant even after statistical correction for demographic differences (β = +2.25%, p < 0.001).