“highly significant”

Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test revealed a highly significant difference in survival distributions between the two groups (χ 2 = 35.64, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).

The differences between the tgE350 + Fe group and the three control groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

T-tests were employed to analyze statistical significance, with * p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and *** p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference. 3.

= 0.59), with a highly significant difference between groups (Fig. 4h , two-sided t -test: t (200) = 125.50, P < 0.001, d = 17.75, 95% CI 73.4–75.8).

Factors showing highly significant associations ( p < 0.001) included education level, relationship with leadership, and perceived fairness of policy implementation.

Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed that these differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001 for both DFS and OS).

The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on aphid reduction ( p < 0.001).

All differences were highly significant (p < 0.001), with large t values supporting robust group separation (Table 1 ).

The graph ( Figure 7 ) comparing total yield per 3m2 across different treatments over two seasons revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).

Graphical representations of the means, with annotations (*, ***), indicate significant ( p < 0.05), very significant ( p < 0.01), or highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences, respectively.

Most importantly, a highly significant Treatment × Time interaction was confirmed (F(9, 84) = 8.67, p < 0.001).

Among them, the highly significant variables (P< 0.001) included: radscore, D-dimer, SAA Respiratory rate, AGE, BE, and CRP.

However, when the word recognition ability was compared between the intensities, a highly significant difference was observed with a high effect size (F (4) =1,400.87, p <0.001, η 2 =0.98), indicating that word recognition scores differed.

There was a highly significant difference in marital status ( p = 0.001) among adults, who were more evenly divided between married (50.2%) and single (48.25%).

The Wilcoxon paired test confirmed that the decline from the preoperative to postoperative period was highly significant for all four groups (p = 0.001 for each).

The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of yeast strain (Pillai’s trace = 4.33, F 84,175 = 3.38, p < 0.001).

There was evidence of selection relaxation for MHC-I-like1: a highly significant ( P -values < 0.001) RELAX test result for the branch leading to MHC-I-like1 cluster (k: 0.356, LRT: 401.7), and for the cluster itself (k: 0.476, LRT: 42.7), as compared to the MHC-I sequences.

Nearly all extracts showed a highly significant cell migration ( p < 0.001) across concentrations and time points, except for the 50 μg/mL methanol extract, which exhibited lower wound closure (52.4 ± 3.2%, p < 0.05).

Immediately post-OSTE (O2), the experimental group showed significant improvements across all six CTBI domains, with the Committing to Teaching (CT) domain most significantly improved ( p =.003), and the other five domains exhibiting highly significant gains (all p <.001).

The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis revealed that Executive Functions (EF) are a significant and robust predictor of Emotional Self-Regulation (ESR) across the total sample, as indicated by the highly significant standardized coefficient ($\ beta = .68, t = 13.60, p < .001$).

The disparity between the low-dose MeV group and the Erastin group was not significantly different (P>0.05), both the high-dose MeV group and the Fer-1 group showed highly significant differences compared to the Erastin group (P<0.001) ( Figure 7F ). 3.10.

The Friedman test showed a highly significant overall time effect (χ 2 (11) = 455.21, p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.828).

For methane, the ANOVA also revealed a highly significant difference between treatments ( p < 0.001).

Ciprofloxacin resistance rates showed the most substantial decrease across the study period (50.18%), with the decreased being highly significant (Spearman’s rho = − 0.839, very strong negative tendency, 95% CI − 0.954, − 0.511, p = 0.001).

and lateral view highly significant differences were observed ( p < 0.001).