“highly significant”

All the irrigation regimen groups in both the medicament categories had highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in one-way ANOVA [ Table 1 ].

The assessment was done by clinical observation according to VSS before (9.17 ± 2.2) while after (3.33 ± 1.9) with a highly significant P value <0.001 and VAS for the rate of pain & satisfaction that ranged from (8.0 ± 0.9) as well as series of photos taken before and after the procedure.

The highly significant association was predominantly observed in the subgroup of patients who underwent valve surgery (β = 6.243, 95% CI [3.631, 8.856], P < 0.001) and in those with a CCI score > 5 (β = 6.852, 95% CI [3.870, 9.834], P < 0.001).

For both groups, there was a significant difference between the apical third and the other two-thirds, however, the difference between coronal and middle thirds was not statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Results were classified as non-significant ( P > 0.05), significant ( P < 0.05), or highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In the case of NSCLC, the field of imageology revealed a highly significant marker (the highest AUC value was 0.83, P < 0.001), and a similar trend was observed in melanoma lymph nodes (AUC value = 0.64; P = 0.001).

The ROC curve for RPW and secretory activity, with area under curve (AUC) 0.813, 95%CI (0.672–0.953), was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the cut-off value was 47.5% and above, with a sensitivity of 73.3%, 95%CI (44.9–92.0%), and the specificity was 86.2%, 95%CI (68.3–96.0%).

Both wavelength ( P < .001, η 2 p = 0.89) and temperature ( P < .001, η 2 p = 0.93) have significant main effects on growth rate, with a highly significant interaction ( P < .001, η 2 p = 0.87).

When this categorical data is analyzed we find a highly significant relationship between types of studio audience and field study OAR co-occurring, χ 2 (2,306) = 27.790, p < 0.001, with a moderately strong relationship (Cramer’s V = 0.301).

A highly significant association was observed between intrinsic subtypes and C/CMF treatment for DFS ( P interaction = 0.003 unadjusted, P = 0.001 adjusted) and OS ( P interaction = 0.04).

Nevertheless, there was a highly significant relationship between year and cancer stage at the time of surgery orders ( p < 0.001).

This association is positive and highly significant on the within-level (β = 0.54, SE = 0.06, p < 0.001).

The statistical results confirm the hypothesis that the differences between the results are either not significant ( p > 0.05), significant (0.001 < p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference was observed between the TN and control groups ( p < 0.001), along with a significant difference between the HFS and control groups ( p = 0.007).

The lower values for each ∆clpB mutant were highly significant for each of the constructs ( P < 0.001), demonstrating that ClpB of both subspecies plays a very important role for efficient T6S during infection.

However, after including log(followers), the coefficients of all three sentiment measures underwent a fundamental transformation, consistently becoming highly significant negative values (RoBERTa: beta = −0.430, p < 0.001; SnowNLP: beta = −0.388, p < 0.001; PCA: beta = −0.403, p < 0.001).

There was also a highly significant difference in HbA1c between LH+ and LH− subjects, 9.61 vs 8.85, respectively ( p < 0.001).

Overall, we observed a highly significant association between NfL and age (ρ = 0.65, p < 0.001).

Time effects and treatment × time interactions were highly significant for all milk component yields (p<0.001).

1 ) and Wilcoxon tests comparing the permuted mean distance versus the distribution of distances among specimens were all highly significant ( p < 0.001 in each case).

Multivariable and spatial pathways to mortality The multivariable OLS regression model was highly significant (F(4, 45)=8.32, p<0.001), explaining 42.5% of the geographic variance in cardiovascular mortality in the United States (R2=0.425).

5c ), PM 2·5 demonstrated a strong and highly significant decrease with distance (β = −0.6345 μg m −3 per 100 m; 95% CI: −0.6989 to −0.5701; R 2 = 0.7919; r = −0.8899; p < 0.001), indicating a pronounced near-road effect.

Results were considered significant when p < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

As reported in previous studies 17 , 23 , 28 , ADMIXTURE and RFMix individual-level admixture estimates are highly correlated (Spearman’s rho: 0.997 European, 0.986 African, 0.986 Native American, and 0.537 East Asian ancestry, all of them are highly significant: P -value < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig.

As in previous cohorts, there was a highly significant increase in brain weight relative to body weight in Nf1 +/- mice compared to +/+ controls (Fig. 4G : main effects – Genotype: p < 0.001; Sex: p < 0.001).