“highly significant”

Descriptive Statistics of Diversity Gene diversity ( H j , see Table 1 ) is almost two times higher in the populations of cluster B (mean H j = 0.150 ; sd = 0.025) than in those of cluster A (mean H j = 0.089; sd = 0.026) and the difference in means between the two clusters is highly significant ( T (34 . 5) = 7.076, p < 0.001).

The Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( p <0.001) for all domains.

Table 4 shows that the intervention group (Philips 66 with CBL) showed highly significant improvements ( p <0.001) with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d ranging from 0.597 to 0.635), demonstrating a substantial positive impact on all facets of clinical judgment as defined by the LCJR: Noticing, Interpreting, Responding, and Reflecting.

In both cases the main effect of education was found to be highly significant (p<0.001).

Impact of a Four-Week TOGU Training Program on FMS Scores Following four weeks of core and balance training, we observed that the total FMS scores of the 16 participants of the TOGU group showed a highly significant improvement compared to their pre-training levels ( p < 0.001, Figure 4 A); and the total FMS score after training improved by 11.48%.

To summarize these results in a single conditional logit model, we added all highly significant (i.e. p<0.001) interactions to a backward-stepwise method of estimating the conditional logit model (Model 2).

The factor loadings for all items met the criterion value of 0.35; the KMO index was 0.91, and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant at p < 0.001, confirming that a highly reliable and valid instrument was constructed.

This difference was highly significant p < 0.001 ( p = 1.51 × 10 − 5 ).

A highly significant main effect of task [ F (2,108) = 29.119, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.350] suggested that the retrieval of dissimilar pairs was more demanding than the retrieval of similar pairs and the DMS-task ( p < 0.001 for both pairwise comparisons, respectively).

Across all surveys, significantly more species (summed species occurrences at each island) were recorded at Darwin and Wolf than at all other sites (ANOVA, F = 80.4, df : 11,25, p < 0.001; differences between Darwin and all islands, except Wolf, highly significant, p < 0.001; see Table SI- 2 for listing of species, Table SI- 3 for the ANOVA table).

Bragd et al ( 14 ) found that SDBG derived from SMBG was also a highly significant predictor of hypoglycemic unawareness (P = 0.001).

Highly significant differences in microbiome diversity were detected using ANOSIM pair-wise comparisons between all species (ANOSIM R ≥ 0.95, p = 0.001), while location differences produced lower dissimilarities (R < 0.04).

Pre-registered hypotheses The morality-only model of partisan prejudice was highly significant, F (5, 1045) = 40.76 .13, p < .001, and explained 16% of the variance in partisan prejudice.

The strong and highly significant correlation (r = 0.805, p < 0.001) between VO 2max determined by the 20-meter shuttle run test and VO 2max estimated using the developed regression equation is depicted in Figure 2 .

p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) was considered highly significant, p < 0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****) was considered extremely significant.

Statistical analysis (ANOVA) showed highly significant effects between the groups ( P < 0.001) on cell viability.

During the remaining three weeks from ligature replacement (W16) through week 19, a highly significant increase in defect depth and width was noted, 1.24 mm (p < .001) and 0.89 mm (p < .001), respectively (Figs. 5 and 6 ).

Notably, the variation between BA10 and BA44/45 was highly significant (*** p < 0.001).

All the indices indicated a good fit to the data (CFI = 0.960; TLI = 0.951; SRMR = 0.044; RMSEA = 0.046) and the structural coefficients were highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Additional files 7 and 8 ).

Results A highly significant correlation between the mRNA expression levels and protein levels of KLK5 in tumor tissues was observed (r s = 0.683, p < 0.001).

The times required for total sensory reclamation ( Table 2 ) was 328.83±63.41 min in RD5, 345.13±66.38 min in RD7.5, and 421.21±94 min in RD10 which is statistically highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).

However since, there is a difference in age between the two groups, we also performed analysis between adult animals that were positive for SEOV RNA in liver versus those that were negative and found a highly significant correlation between the number of PMN and SEOV infection in the liver by RT-PCR ( Figure 2 B; t -test, p < 0.001).

Disease activity index (DAI) measurement DAI showed a highly significant increase in the DSS group compared to the control ( p < 0.001).

A solid and highly significant relationship exists between core area and home range size (Spearman’s correlation r = 0.96, df = 5, p < 0.001).

Spearman correlations ( Table S1 in the Supplement) revealed highly significant positive relationships between all WMH measures (0.36 ≤ r s ≤ 0.89; all p < 0.001).