Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant (p < 0.001) DEG events between OF and DR over time included T-box genes involved in heart development ( tbx2a/3a ), regulation of glucose ( fam132a ), membrane component ( chst2b ), regulation of vascular permeability ( src ), transmembrane transport ( slc6a17 ), metabolic process ( pah ), retinoic acid regulation ( nr2f5) and axon guidance ( arl3l1 , ntn1a , tnc ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In this nested case-control study, Gray’s test further indicated that CIFs for the patients with D1cc ≤71.14 Gy and patients with D1cc > 71.14 Gy were not statistically different for prior death (coded as 1) ( P = 0.166), but they were highly significant for TLI (coded as 2) ( P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Laboratory investigations In both of the groups in significant changes ere found in most of haematological and biochemical parameters.[ 10 ] [ Table 7 ] Result on International Prostate Symptom Score Statistically highly significant relief ( P < 0.001) was recorded in chief complaints like nocturia, increased frequency of micturition, incomplete voiding, dribbling and weak stream, while significant relief ( P < 0.01) was noted in burning micturition and urgency in group A [ Table 8 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The history of previous fragility fracture in PwP was associated with gender and a significantly greater proportion of females had sustained previous fragility fracture than males (males 22/178, 12.4%; females 50/128, 39.1%, a highly significant difference between proportions test, p < 0.001).
highly significantP <.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
To examine the children in the proximity of cutoff thresholds, we also used the 80th percentile cutoff point (ie, abnormal or border range), which showed that 36 (97%) children were above the cutoff point at baseline, while the respective figure at the 24-month follow-up was 23 (62%), indicating a highly significant change ( P <.001, McNemar test).