“highly significant”

Results and discussion Bioactive compounds Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (p<0.001) among the 21 highbush blueberry cultivars for all measured phytochemical parameters, demonstrating substantial genetic variation within commercial germplasm.

Race, age, insurance, and morbidity proved to be highly significant factors influencing patient discharge destination ( P < .001).

Highly significant ( P < 0.001) genetic variance resided among the two populations (17.34%).

This revealed a highly significant difference, t (67) = 12.4, p < .001, r = .83, with Social Contract scenarios ( M = 15.31, SD = 5.96) being punished more that Neutral scenarios ( M = 4.29, SD = 4.71).

When the two large groups of RP samples (benign RP-B and malignant RP-PCa) were compared with each other, most of the differences were statistically still highly significant (p≤0.001), except for RHOU , LMNB1 and PLA2G7 , indicating the stronger impact of detectable cancer tissue on biomarker expression patterns compared to likely field effects.

There was a highly significant ( P< 0.001) Allele x N rate interaction in 2010 because the grain yield of Rht-B1b was more responsive to N rate than either rht (tall) or Rht-B1c ( Fig 4A ).

However, highly significant differences were observed in both the posttest (t = 14.289, P < 0.001) and follow-up (t = 12.002, P < 0.001) results in favor of the intervention group.

2h ) and highly significant ( n = 45, r = −0.467, P = 0.001) at quadrat (cage) level ( Fig.

The mean API was almost twofold higher in boys (33.0 ± 4.4) than in young men (18.1 ± 2.8), with this difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 2 , Fig. 1 ).

Cochran’s Q test was highly significant for bilirubin ( Q = 44,447; df = 20; p < 0.001), infection ( Q = 77.5, df = 19, p < 0.001) and “other” ( Q = 69.91, df = 11, p < 0.001) demonstrating that the observed variation in effect sizes exceeds that expected by chance alone and the I 2 statistic approached 100% (bilirubin), 81% (infection), 97% (other).

ANOVA revealed highly significant effects ( P <0.001) of genotype, environment, and their interaction on 100-seed weight ( Supplementary Table S3 ), suggesting that the presence/absence of the ‘ QTL-hotspot ’ region differentiated between genotypes with high and low seed weight.

stoebe and its neighbouring communities In the competition containers, biomass of EU neighbouring community explained a highly significant and substantial amount of the variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.39, Δlog-likelihood = 4.91, P < 0.001; Fig 4a ), but NA neighbouring community did not explain variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.05, Δlog-likelihood = -13.96, P = 0.48; Fig 4b ).

Comparisons indicated that increases in children’s fear beliefs due to fear pairing were approaching borderline significance, F (1, 28) = 3.19, p = .085, r = .32, showing a medium-sized effect ( Cohen, 1988 , 1992 ), and decreases due to happy pairing were highly significant, F (1, 28) = 25.11, p < .001, r = .69.

Pairwise permutation tests confirmed that the difference in reproductive skew between Sparouine and each of the other sites was highly significant ( p < 0.001), while pairwise comparisons between Regina, Paracou, and Nouragues were not significant.

In the statistical analysis of the significance of this difference, considering the clustered nature of data of participants within centers and a between-cluster randomization design, the parameter estimating the effect of the group was not significant ( p = 0.27), while the hypothesis test regarding the significance of the “center” random effect was highly significant ( p <0.001).

For all strains, growth decrease with 10 mg ml −1 bLF compared to zero was highly significant ( P <0.001), and with 1 mg ml −1 for some strains ( P ≤0.02).

As for histologic grade, a highly significant association was observed between histologic grade and Ki-67 expression (χ2, 64.244, p < 0.001).

A one-way within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the keyword scores showed a highly significant effect of condition on intelligibility, F (10, 210) = 40.651, p < .001, η 2 = 0.659 3 .

The analysis showed that there is a highly significant difference in compressive strength between PEEK and composite inlays (p < 0.001).

Quantitative analysis revealed a highly significant decrease in Rhodamine-123 fluorescence intensity in Y 2 O 3 -NPs-treated Hela cells (p < 0.001), indicating substantial mitochondrial depolarization.

All pairwise comparisons were highly significant ( p < 0.001), further supporting these conclusions ( Table S4 ).

rhabdocladus were highly significant ( P < 0.001), while the effect of maximum temperature on was significant (0.001 < P < 0.01).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( P < 0,001 ), conforming that the correlation matrix was suitable for PCA.

The two-way ANOVA documented a nonsignificant main effect of the group ( F = 2.0; P = .17) but highly significant effects of hippocampal subfield ( F = 35.0; P < .001) and of the group × hippocampal subfield interaction ( F = 4.2; P = .002).

Epichloë bromicola enhances osmotic adjustment capacity under salt stress Highly significant effects were found for E. bromicola and salt on proline ( F = 44.45, p < 0.001, F = 26.81, p < 0.001), soluble sugar ( F = 37.46, p < 0.001, F = 65.93, p < 0.001), and soluble protein contents ( F = 147.32, p < 0.001, F = 69.86, p < 0.001).