“highly significant”

Comparisons between nephrographic and excretory phases show a highly significant difference in scores in favor of excretory phase for criterion C2 (renal pelvis/calyxes) ( p < 0.001) and a significant difference in scores for criterion C3 (proximal ureters) ( p = 0.021).

When new masculinity was pulled into the model, masculinity stress remained highly significant ( B = 0.39, SE = 0.095, Wald = 16.53, p < 0.001), and new masculinity accounted for significant variance ( B = 0.33, SE = 0.165, Wald = 3.97, p = 0.046).

The sex difference between females and males showing the secondary sex signs was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The Insomnia Index yielded a highly significant difference among the shifts (p = 0.001).

The influence on survival of an ALC < 1.2 × 10 9 /l in this group was highly significant (mean OS 36 vs. 56 months, p = 0.001; Fig. 1b ).

In this model, the OR for having a non-HIV-associated condition listed on the death certificate in 2004 compared to 1999 was 1.6 (95%CI = 1.48,1.72; p-value<0.001) for the HIV group, and 1.19 (95%CI = 1.14,1.23; p-value<0.001) for the non-HIV group and ( Table 1 ); the interaction with year as a categorical variable was also highly significant (p-value<0.001).

The global effect of both species and exposure (sun/shade) on the physiological variables of field samples was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant association (P<0.001) between sex and place of tobacco use.

1 B, to distinguish between pregnancies where a fetal C2 is presented compared with those in which C1 only is presented, there was a highly significant difference in the frequency of the maternal AA genotype when combined with fetal C2 (P = 0.001; OR = 2.38; CI = 1.45–3.90; Fig. 1 C).

Despite this lateral bias, there was nevertheless a highly significant relationship between brightness condition and arrival side ( χ 2 (3) = 154.63, p < 0.001), with the birds switching their preferred arrival side from right to left when the background was bright to the left ( table 1 ; figure 1 e ).

P values from all statistical tests were presented, but were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at P ≤ 0.001.

The difference in concordance between AI systems and experts was highly significant (ΔAC1 + 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–0.90; p < 0.001).

In OSMF, comparison between mild (grade1) versus moderate (grade 2) is not significant ( P = 0.367), but mild (grade 1) versus severe (grade 3) and moderate (grade 2) versus severe (grade 3) is highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 7 ].

Results Analysis of variance The combined analysis of variance (Table 2 ) showed that genotype (GEN) and environment (ENV) had a highly significant (p < 0.001) effect on all the studied traits, whereas the effect of genotype was significant on all the studied traits except for CT.

All of them showed highly significant heterogeneity (p<.001).

In patients with an abnormal and large %CO reduction (<−15%), the relation was highly significant: %CBF reduction = 0.8291 × %CO reduction − 5.789; R 2 = 0.645; p < 0.001.

leontopetaloides -derived compounds, the novel compound Tarkalynin A ( 1 ) displayed the most promising activity, but again with a highly significant separation between the Trypanozoon and Nannomonas subgenera ( p < 0.001), as EC 50 values against the former ranged between 21.4 μM ( T. equiperdum ) and 46.0 μM for T. evansi , whereas the compound was almost inactive against T. congolense (EC 50 = 246 μM).

Due to our large sample sizes, differences in the listed singleton and proportions across the four A[C→T]X subtypes were highly significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons ( P < 0.001).

The difference in cartilage thickness between 2.25 ± 0.11 mm controls and 2.0 ± 0.07 mm samples was highly significant with p < 0.001.

For the mean drop angle, there was a highly significant difference between brands (F(2,12) = 192.40, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 p = 0.97).

Again, as in Experiment 1 there was a highly significant interaction between condition and visual area (interaction: χ 2 = 64.806, p < 0.001; main effect of visual area: χ 2 = 72.031, p < 0.001; main effect of condition: χ 2 = 21.572, p < 0.001).

However, when we stimulated the peripheral blood T cells (PBTs) with mitogen to induce Fas up-regulation, we found a highly significant deficit (P < 0.001) in the ability of PBTs from PD patients to up-regulate Fas ( Fig. 5 ).

This clustering was highly significant when compared with random distributions of genes mapped to the same chromosomes (P < 0.001; Fig. 4 A).

All Φ-statistics were highly significant ( P < 0.001 or P < 0.05), except for the“within populations” component at the hierarchical “ D . longispina clades” level and the unstructured dataset of D . dentifera (Tables 2 and 3 ).

The variability in diversity between study years was highly significant (P < 0.001).