“highly significant”

These represent relative reductions of approximately 30 % (IR) and 34.8 % (XR) from baseline, each highly significant (Wilcoxon, p < 0.001 within groups) ( Table 6 , Table 7 ).

A Danish study including 28,000 people followed up over 14 years reported, in the men only, a highly significant ( P = 0.001) direct association with NMSC for vigorous activity vs low activity, with a rate ratio of 1.72 (95% CI 1.23–2.40) [ 52 ].

For RTs, the interaction of respiratory state and phase was a significant predictor in the stimulus-aligned data ( p < 0.05; see Table 1 for detailed results) and all factors were highly significant for the response-aligned data ( p < 0.001; see Table 1 ).

We found a significantly higher N concentration in mistletoe on N-fixing hosts than on non-N-fixing hosts ( Figure 5A ), and a highly significant correlation of leaf δ 15 N between mistletoe and host (R 2 = 0.94, P<0.001) across the nine mistletoe–host pairs (both N-fixing and non-N-fixing hosts, Figure 3F ), indicating a high N dependency of mistletoe on its hosts.

roseus had highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.001) with each other ( Figure 6 ).

For instance, Moran's I for spatial heteroskedasticity in the most vegetated snapshot of the scale-dependent data was only 0.021, but was highly significant ( p = 0.001) because the sample size was n = 10,000.

The estimated logistic regression coefficients of ecotourism benefit are also highly significant (p < 0.001) representing those respondents who are benefiting from WETA.

However, supplementation of vitamin D resulted in a highly significant improvement in glycemic parameters , p≤0.001.

Furthermore, immune infiltration analyses showed that 8 types of immune cell infiltration showed highly significant differences between the two risk groups ( p < 0.001).

For AI, the main effect of group was also highly significant ( p < 0.001), accompanied by a very large effect size ( η p 2 = 0.54), showing that EG was significantly greater than NG.

Exploratory Factor Analysis KMO revealed a value of 0.92 and Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant ( P <.001), indicating that data were suitable for factor analysis.

One of the physiological stimuli of HASM cell migration, platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) was used as a positive control which induced highly significant increase in the number of migrated HASM cells (p < 0.001, n = 4, Fig. 1A, B ).

Body size The gender effects on body size were highly significant ( P < 0.001), showing larger females than males (Table 3 ).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences between the resin composite materials (p<0.001).

Then, when comparing the ferritin level after 10 days in the methylprednisolone limb versus the dexamethasone limb, it shows a highly significant statistical difference p value < 0.001 (292.96 ± 330.10 vs 648.10 ± 329.09); also, D-dimer after 10 days shows a highly significant statistical difference p value < 0.001 when comparing both groups.

This decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001) with an effect size of 68%.

Indeed, these four viable deoptimized viruses showed a highly significant attenuated phenotype in PBMCs ( p < 0.001).

The differences among groups were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Mean Corpuscular Volume showed a highly significant peak LOD score of 6.8 on chromosome 7 at 79 Mb and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Content had a peak LOD score of 8.2 on chromosome 7 at 86 Mb (corrected p values < 0.001, Fig. 3C, 3D ).

Differences in the presence and extent of tumors between the E2 + P4- and placebo-treated mice in both the BPRN -homo and BPRN -het groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

The difference in the proportion of females choosing the pesticide-free side between the conditioned and unconditioned females groups was highly significant for all insecticides tested (Likelihood Odds ratio: P < 0.001 in all cases, Table 2 ).

The experiments with pure Ensulizole showed highly significant time-dependency (p < 0.001), but no significant concentration effect was found (p = 0.086).

The correlations were highly significant in all blood parameters ( p ≥ 0.001; Figure 2 ).

A Chi-square test of independence confirmed a highly significant association between CVS method and sample weight category (χ 2 = 350.92, df = 4, p < 0.001).

Because these analyses were based on Bayesian estimates, we could not directly assess model fit, but we noted that all of the individual factor loadings were highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the items in each composite contributed to a single latent factor.