Significant postoperative improvements were observed in range of motion (from 73.2 degrees preoperatively to 104.3 degrees postoperatively), OKS (from 14.3 to 29.2), and KSS (from 48.2 to 74.9), all of which were highly significant (p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Regional GDP has a positive and highly significant impact (0.1687, p < 0.001), indicating that higher regional economic performance increases rental prices, reflecting the influence of economic conditions on housing demand.
We found a highly significant effect of electrode site on saccade direction (p ≪ 0.001, F = 84.14, d.f. = 3, see Fig. 2 ), but also the stimulation current impacted the direction (p < 0.001, F = 16.39, d.f. = 1) as well as the interaction of current and electrode (p < 0.001, F = 6.94, d.f. = 3), indicating that the rotational change induced by a higher current was not consistent across electrodes.
coagulans with immobility times 2.2 s, 5.5 s, and 7.4 s with decreasing concentration in a highly significant manner ( p < 0.001).
Highly significant correlations between the SA/JA ratio with redox status [GSH/GSSG ( P < 0.001) and NADPH/NADP + ( P < 0.01) ratios] and the expression of phenylpropanoid synthesis-related genes [ CHS ( P < 0.01), ANR ( P < 0.001), and F5H ( P < 0.01)] were observed ( Table 2 ).
Except for ‘vinegar’ ( p < 0.05), all other aroma attributes showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among the hawthorn wines.
The genetic differentiation indices were highly significant ( D EST = 0.082, p = 0.001).
Furthermore, for all those variables, the differences between the subjects with and without LSRDs were highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001).
6 i) showed that there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in blood loss between the blank group and three treatment groups, indicating that both gelatin sponge and cryogel exhibited hemostatic effects.
5B , H 2 O 2 leads to a highly significant decrease in myoblast adhesion ( p ≤ 0.001) and induces non-adherence in 50% cells while pre-treatment of LHCN-M2 cells with EtOAc fractions (1 μg/mL and 3 μg/mL) significantly restored myoblasts adhesion to around 90%.
rs2383206 Similar to the SNP rs10757278, the genetic variations of rs2383206 among studied groups were found to be highly significant (p=0.001).
Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05, with highly significant results flagged at p < 0.001.
Highly significant differences ( p <0.001) were established in examining representation in percentages of a profile with a prominent chin ( Table 3 ).
The difference in non-attendance for eye care according to type of school is highly significant (χ 2 = 44.40 df = 1 p < .001).
Within the AGD group, there was a highly significant positive correlation between U crit and C t values ( r = −0.50, N = 58, P < 0.001), such that more infected individuals tended to elicit a poorer swimming performance (Fig. 3 ).
We observed biased mutation frequencies among them that were highly significant in the χ 2 test ( p < 0.001).
chuatsi was highly significant, 0.640 (p < 0.001).
An Analysis of Covariance on this data revealed a highly significant difference between the three groups, F = 7.19(2, 83), p <.001.
Results Soil sampling and analyses The results from the 163 individual samples included in this study showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) but rather weak ( r 2 = 0.28) relationship between P-AL and DP in the DESPRAL test, suggesting a positive, but rather diffuse, relationship between P-AL and DP release.
Results from the pairwise comparison revealed highly significant differences among most pairings (p < 0.001) with the exception of the climatological AH-combination AH pair ( Table 2 ).
The ANOVA results indicated a highly significant effect of mangrove stand type on AGB ( p < 0.001).
Convergent validity was verified by a highly significant association (Spearman’s rho=0.881; P <0.001) between the DES Summary score and the self- assessment of the level of stress perceived due to dental environment.
A highly significant difference was noted in the prevalence of cortical bone perforation between prosthetically- and bone-driven ideal positions ( P <0.001, Pearson χ 2 test).
The HACOR score of NIV success and failure groups are compared at different intervals(beginning,1-2 hrs,12 hrs,24 hrs) and the result is statistically significant(p=0.001, highly significant).
Bone loss was highly significant at 30% 2D RL but not at 30% 3D RSA ( p < 0.001, Table 2 ).