“highly significant”

Barlett’s test of Sphericity was highly significant (X 2 = 6988.4, p < 0.001).

No major changes in vital signs and weight were noted across the three arms throughout the 6-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes The increases in the percentage of CD4 + FoxP3 + CD25 high Treg from the baseline levels were highly significant ( p value < 0.001) across all the six timepoints (D8, D36, D64, D92, D120, D148) throughout the treatment phase in both the IL-2 q2wk and IL-2 q4wk arms, compared to the placebo arm.

Durations of chest tube drainage in study group was less than of control group which was highly significant (p value = 0.001).

One-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between time points within groups M1 and M2.

However, there was a greater than 57% reduction in the number of sporozoites found 2 h post-feeding, compared with 0 h; this was highly significant; P = 0.001.

This indicates that while Enprocal D did not induce oxidative stress in the gut cells, P2 treatment led to highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in the activities of these enzymes indicating that it is inducing an oxidative stress response.

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) with a medium effect size (from 0.51 to 0.73) were observed for the following parameters: sTfR, CHr, LowCHr, MCVr, MCH, MCV, CH, LowCHm, and MICROm.

Also, a highly significant association was observed between SPF and ploidy (p<0.001), as 23% of the tumors with SPF, less than 7.5% were aneuploid, compared to 74% of the tumors with higher proliferation rates [ 30 ].

Spearman’s rank correlation analysis yielded a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between all three cognitive scoring systems (MMSE, MoCA, and CCS).

The Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 167.5, p < 0.001), supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis [ 29 ].

T-test showed that Cohen’s d is 0.341, which exceeds the level of 0.2 and is highly significant ( t = 7.136, two-sided p < 0.001).

For the observers’ freezing, a 6 epoch (baseline, shock 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) × 2 preexposure (preexposed versus nonpreexposed) ANOVA on observer freezing revealed highly significant main effects for epoch (F [3.406,54.497] = 21.682, p < 0.001), preexposure (F [1,16] = 35.97, p < 0.001), and epoch × preexposure interaction (F [3.406,54.497] = 5.804, p = 0.001).

Mean comparisons of AgNPs (C) alone at 425 and 850 μg/mL were found statistically highly significant ( p -value<0.001).

Analyzing the data looking for the prevalence among these patients, the correlation test revealed a highly significant correlation between gingival bleeding index and age, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.361 ( p <0.001).

In vitro Killing Kinetics of MDR-EAEC With Indolicidin In groups I, II, and V, the antimicrobial effect of Indolicidin was highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 120 min of co-incubation ( Figure 1 ).

Hence, adopting the total oocyte number from PVO4b to VTO as our proxy for potential fecundity, the relationship with body size (TL) was positive and highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001; Fig. 5A ), while no differences among spawning seasons was observed (GLM, P = 0.76).

There is a highly significant (p < 0.001) time-dependent difference in age distribution.

The alveolar bone width was higher in the maxilla than the mandible with highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).

Model IV (versus model III), shows that the influence of A is highly significant since removing it from the model results in a considerable worsening of fit (χ 2 (1) = 293.2, p <.001).

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) resulted in highly significant effects ( p = 0.001) of the clusters on the molecular variance observed in the GBS SNP dataset ( Table 2 ).

Reduction of seizures of those patients as calculated from seizure diary was still highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Results The univariate LME showed highly significant differences between previously malnourished and control groups ( p < 0.001); age ( p = 0.01) was also significant, with no interaction between group and age detected.

The difference between these two syllable types is highly significant (sign test p < 0.001), as 22 of the 23 speakers have more pulses in the case of the coda condition.

In cases where the value exceeded 11.35, the significance was considered more robust ( p < 0.01), and above 16.27, the association between the cluster and the terms was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The difference in survival probabilities from the time of diagnosis and from the start of treatment with purine analogs between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.001).