“highly significant”

The data, when analyzed statistically, was found to be highly significant (p-value<0.001) ( Table 2 ).

For example, in HorvathAge (Table S1 ), the interaction term for gender was not significant ( p = 0.898), while for race/ethnicity, the interaction term was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating stronger associations between PA and epigenetic age in non-Hispanic whites compared to other racial/ethnic groups.

The proportional hazard hypothesis was tested and rejected as the time-dependent covariate for group was highly significant (P=0.001).

Administration of DXP with 500 mg/kg 5-FU resulted in a highly significant decrease in uric acid levels ( P < 0.001) and a significant decrease in BUN and creatinine levels ( P < 0.05).

Energetic cost of sloughing During the intermoult phase, body mass had a highly significant effect on resting V ̇ C O 2 ( t 16 = 10.6, P < 0.001; Fig. 5 ) with an allometric slope of 0.95 ( V ̇ C O 2 = 0.025 M b 0.95 ; R 2 = 0.95).

A highly significant main effect of time was observed (F = 603.843, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.968), demonstrating significant temporal dynamics in cell viability.

β-caryophyllene and TMA shared the same trend and displayed highly significant recovery ( ### p <0.001) at 1 and 10 μg/mL for β-caryophyllene, and 0.1–10 μg/mL for TMA ( Figure 9 ). 2.10.

Temperature (tm) had a highly significant positive effect on the number of red deer ( P < 0.001, Coef = 10.25, T = 13.89), indicating that a 1 °C increase in temperature was associated with an increase of approximately 10.25 individuals.

A highly significant correlation between the amount of human gDNA template with the total number of RPP30 copies was observed in intra-laboratory (R 2 = 0.996, p < 0.001), inter-laboratory (R 2 = 0.997, p < 0.001) and inter-operational (R 2 = 0.994, p < 0.001) RPP30 ddPCR assays (Supplementary Figure S5A to C ).

When BRI is ≥3.7, its association with sarcopenia is stronger and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The differences between IF and the other regions were highly significant (p < 0.001), and the difference between CT and CI was also significant (p = 0.016539).

mutans , and Lactobacillus counts were observed following cavity disinfection in all three groups and was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in all groups [ Table 1 ].

However, the cross-linked carrier-based and injection-molded thermoplasticized groups showed overall highly significant differences with the single-cone obturation group at 6, 9, and 12 mm ( P < 0.001).

When examining costs, switch targets showed marginally significant restart costs [ t (21) = 1.99, p = 0.059, Cohen's d = 0.20], while repeat targets showed highly significant restart costs [ t (21) = 5.60, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.43].

The correlation was negative and highly significant in both data sets (classic task: r = -0.1159, p < 0.001; interruptus task: r = -0.1156, p < 0.001), thus arguing against this possible interpretation.

For the set of leaf hydraulic traits, the correlation between stomatal density and stomatal length was highly significant and negative (-0.58; p < 0.001).

A highly significant inverse correlation between age at initial PD diagnosis and time until dementia onset (Spearman’s correlation, ρ = −0.66, p < 0.001) was also found in the PDD group as a whole (Fig. 5 ).

The chi-square (X 2 ) test showed a highly significant association between MAFLD and steatosis ( p < 0.001).

Significant effects of variation in cover at source site on germination The multinomial logistic regression revealed highly significant effects of source region, variance of cover of surrounding vegetation at source site and the interaction of both (all P < 0.001).

Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression‐free survival Further evaluation of subgroups by univariate Cox regression analysis showed that treatment group (lenalidomide favoured over IC) was the main effect associated with significantly improved PFS (HR = 0·65; P = 0·005), which was also highly significant by multivariate analysis (HR = 0·42; P < 0·001) (Table 1 ).

The highly significant result of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow test ( P < 0.001), indicating a poor goodness of fit, is most likely explained by the large sample size and should be interpreted with caution. 23 Based on the calibration curve and the bootstrap resampling, the internal validation was considered satisfactory.

All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that estimation errors tended to increase as VF severity worsened.

While empathy has a substantial and highly significant effect on moral sensitivity ( B = 0.971, p =0.001, beta = 0.864), EI also contributes to a lesser extent ( B = 0.071, p =0.019, beta = 0.095).

Analysis by orthogonal contrasts showed a highly significant overall effect of pattern ( F (1,57) = 14.5, P <0.001), which was significant on the front of the trap ( F (1,57) = 12.2, P = 0.001) as well as on the back ( F (1,57) = 7.3, P = 0.009).

The change in the amount of explained variance between Models 1 and 2 is highly significant (R 2 Change = . 27-.28, p<.001).